31
Hyde Schools / Remove the poll
« on: November 08, 2007, 04:07:05 PM »
Remove. That is my vote
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Alfie never did get it, did he? .............................
Probably Hyde will never get it either.
Quote from: ""Guest""Code: [Select]you folk seem a tad old and actually my age to be dealing with what is going on now
Really? How old is too old?
It is a popular sentiment ingrained in our culture: "get over it already." Dwell on it too long, and something is wrong with you, not the experience.
The older I get, the longer the path ahead stretches out before me. I ain't never gonna get there, folks!
I am fascinated by the blogs and rarely post anywhere. but, I have an interest in the answers and the jury out. Did NOT see of this info before placing kid there, but again JURY out and all of you folk seem a tad old and actually my age to be dealing with what is going on now. Despite my reservations about posting herein, I think you all miss what is going on. has ANYONE looked at "revolutionary" or "debunked" (depends on what you read) psychic named Cayce from virginia beach (do the wikipedia or google), who might have been influential enough (despite his critics) to influence the old man, Gauld? I think that there is something to this. If so, the conservatives you claim (donner and walmart) who support him now would cringe and crap if they saw his views side by side with the liberal, psychic and father of new age stuff. so if the aim is to cut off funding, make the connection to something the conservatives cannot sanction--something not Christian in its truest sense. Cayce taught that all souls have a purpose in life (sound eerily familiar?). Was a "seer" folks, a psychic. He describes phenomenon like Gauld does in his speech to all new parents about the new years' eve party wherein he changes his life, forever. So, what if this guy is a nutcase follower of Cayce who has blinded the right wing to his liberal agenda? What if the education is only secondary (and apparently successful) foray into his new age, past lives agenda??? anyone for a legitimate CURRENT discussion of what is going on there NOW?
Quote from: ""Hydemom""Quote from: ""JoeSoulBro""It is part of the Hyde ethos. You are responsible for your experience at Hyde. If Hyde does not work for you it is because you did not commit to the process. So if you are sexually harassed at Hyde it is because you allowed it to happen.
Very interesting that you say this. When LD enjoyed himself rubbing his body all over my daughter she complained to Ken Grant who then called her into a meeting with LD, (without my knowledge) along with other adult staff. She was made to confront him in front of all. MY GOD, this was a sexual assault and they want a young teenage girl to be in the same room as the perpetrator to "confront" him?? Sorry, but this goes beyond sick!! Every single one of those staff who participated in this and knew it was wrong needs to look at themselves and ask why they were such cowards. I am referring to the non family members who were upset yet kept silent.
This picture is achingly similar to the picture of Hyde School thinking there was nothing wrong with assembling the student body for butt naked fat measurements.
Point is, Hyde thinks there is nothing wrong with this.
And it doesn't matter that the rest of the world thinks there is something wrong with this, cuz the rest of the world is in a piss-poor position to judge character. Character being, of course, what Hyde is the expert at.
Remember, Joe said "leave the character judgments to us, we are in a better position to judge than parents are" (paraphrase; emphasis added).
The fact that they think there is nothing wrong with these kinds of things reflects a very sick, conservative, and paternalistic outlook. The bottom of that barrel has yet to be scraped.
conservative
Quote from: ""Guest""Hyde mom,
I agree. Nothing funny about it. It is pure blame the victim right out of the Catholic Church play book. The chickens will come home to roost some day, they always do. Hyde will toss a parent out on their ear over simple disagreements but will embrace a sycophant guilty of moral and criminal transgressions. It makes all the character BS exactly that. BS. They talk the talk but can't walk the walk.
The difference between the Catholic Church and Hyde is that the Catholic Church has humbled themselves and are making sure this doesn't happen again. Hyde stood behind LD and when they finally made a statement it was, "LD will be taking a little time off to look at his life."
There was no doubt that the "concern" was about LD, not the victim.
Quote from: ""Ursus""But what happened to the adults in that situation? The perp, his wife?.Don't know.
Hawley pal: Phil
Don't remember a lot more details--old age + tried not to let it all sink into my brain at the time . . . LA LA LA my authority figures are FREAKS!! LA LA LA secrets are Ok for some but not others LA LA LA haven't had sex yet, but know WAY too much about adult complications LA LA LA
Quote from: ""JoeSoulBro""QuoteNo one ever seems to remember that one,
Actually, a woman from the time Mr bear and I were at hyde told me the story. She was an eye witness. Joe was sent to Hawaii to unwind. I did not witness Joe slapping the girl in the lunch line for the offense of "having no personality" but I was in the student union when it happened. A buzz went thought the building. "Joe just ... !" That man was strung tighter than the drone string on Bela Fleck's banjo. It is a wonder he hasn't completely lost control of his temper and done something horrific. When ever I was near him I sensed that he was teetering on the edge of some emotional cataclysm, like a volcano about to erupt.
Oddly enough, this is where Joe went after the incident during my time. Hawaii must be some sort of 'safe haven'. I would actually venture a guess about extradition laws, but it being a full fledged state in the Union probably renders that theory null and void.
For clarification, I think I should point out that I personally did not actually 'witness' the act in and of itself. Two other students did and being present for their public excoriation was what I was referring to in regards to this incident. I realized my statement from before could be construed as me having direct involvement and I wanted to clear that up.
Interestingly enough, the school seemed to deal with this in exactly the same manner as in the 70's. I suppose this is to be expected. What I have always wondered is how many incidents might have occurred with no witnesses whatsoever.
Oddly enough, this is where Joe went after the incident during my time.
No one ever seems to remember that one,