Author Topic: Professional potheads...  (Read 12774 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #15 on: November 04, 2002, 09:42:00 PM »
As I fire off some $350 an ounce hydro, I say I must agree.  To what I am not sure I remember....
the new anonomous
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #16 on: November 04, 2002, 09:46:00 PM »
We should have a get together at one of the NORML rallies.
Straightlings with spliffs....
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dreammagician

  • Posts: 148
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #17 on: November 05, 2002, 03:50:00 AM »
That would be funny, we all get together and form a big cirle holding hands. Sing cult songs like zippedeedoodaaa. When the parents come out, we spit in there face and fire up doobies and continue ranting these insane songs. Yipppeeeeee, hheheheheh. What a riot, we kick the livin hell out of Newton and then pick up one of those blue chairs and slam it over his face. I smoke more weed, mellow out and realize this is only a figment of my imagination, a dream, one forgotten.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ClayL

  • Posts: 373
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #18 on: November 05, 2002, 09:38:00 AM »
The so called progressive tax is based on some kind of fallacy. It like there is only one pile of money out there and the rich are rich because they got there first and took more than their fare share. This is not true. Most rich people I know are there because they are quite smart, work very hard and are driven by simple goals. Like stomping their competetion into the ground. My attorney once told my when I was threatened with a lawsuit, "Business is pretty Darwinian isn't it?" In the 10K v. 100K sinereo our current situation is that the 10K person pays no tax while the 100K (which the IRS defines as wealthy) person pay roughly 32% not countong FICA and State taxes. I don't know about you but I don't work my ass off to give it to a bunch of people to give most of it to the worst money managers in the history of man. I truly believe a flat tax would be fair and equitable to all citizens. The Dems. will never go for it as their largest voting block is the poor. Why give them an opportunity to earn more as the wealthy gain greater resources to invest in the industries and businesses that grow our economy. The only way a flat tax makes no sense is if the "wealthy" stuff their money in jars and leave it in the back yard.

CL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #19 on: November 05, 2002, 03:01:00 PM »
$350 an ounce isn't so bad, new anon, it's better than what I sell my kind home greens for.
The old unregistered anon
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #20 on: November 05, 2002, 03:04:00 PM »
We really should have a STRAIGHT/KIDS grow-op/co-op by geographic region.  A cooperative ganja effort.  I bet there are several STRAIGHTS in my area than would love a taste of kind bud or would love to know where to unload some.  There should be some kind of collaborative thing going on.
Just an idea.
The old unregistered anon
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #21 on: November 05, 2002, 03:06:00 PM »
Thats not my avatar, only was attached by responding--cool though.
The old unregistered anon
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline enough

  • Posts: 136
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #22 on: November 05, 2002, 03:20:00 PM »
I asked my dad if he got a tax rebate last year, he did, they got $600 back. All he did was put it in the bank. The Bush Tax cut shaved 1500 of his federal tax bill, and it too went into the bank.

People get rich by saving money, not by spending it.

Incidentally - those rebates last year had to be financed by the government issuing debt in the form of a special round of treasury notes- so we are paying interest on the 40billion that we borrowed to give back to people who mostly didn't need it.It will take ten years to pay off those rebates alone.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ladyjerrico

  • Posts: 321
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #23 on: November 05, 2002, 06:33:00 PM »
Quote

On 2002-11-05 12:01:00, Anonymous wrote:
$350 an ounce isn't so bad, new anon, it's better than what I sell my kind home greens for.

The old unregistered anon
Dang, I'm lucky if I come home with that much at work per week!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
usan Minns

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #24 on: November 05, 2002, 08:02:00 PM »
Then I guess your smokin regs...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #25 on: November 05, 2002, 08:04:00 PM »
could you imagine the posts we'd have to read if lady smoked fine kind bud....
the new anon
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline kaydeejaded

  • Posts: 719
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #26 on: November 05, 2002, 09:11:00 PM »
[ This Message was edited by: kaydeejaded on 2004-03-03 08:35 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
or those who understand, no explanation is necessary; for those who don\'t, none will do

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #27 on: November 05, 2002, 09:40:00 PM »
"In the 10K v. 100K sinereo our current situation is that the 10K person pays no tax while the 100K (which the IRS defines as wealthy) person pay roughly 32% not countong FICA and State taxes."

Not true.  I made eleven thousand a couple years ago and owed eighteen hundred.  I would have owed less if I had made ten thousand, but certainly not nothing.  I went through the whole 1040 step by step.  If I am missing something, and should not owe anything, please let me know!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dreammagician

  • Posts: 148
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #28 on: November 06, 2002, 09:43:00 AM »
sweet Amsterdam, soon laws are changin out west. Here in Florida looks like we're stuck with the bushes. I hate bushes, I always want to piss on them when I see them. Kind Bud definitely rules and soon the laws will enable our cause with any hope. Time to toke some haze now, so see yall later and yes we can cooperate perhaps on this cause.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ClayL

  • Posts: 373
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Professional potheads...
« Reply #29 on: November 06, 2002, 11:32:00 AM »
I would think so... 11K is below the minimum level, I think.

I have always loved the phrase "got back" or "refund" This means the IRS over charged you by that much money and thus wrote themselves a short-term NO intrest loans TAKING it from your income even before you see it. I think if we had no "withholding" and had to pay our tax bill when it was due we'd feel the pain of paying the government for the dubious services they provide. We'd then see an outright revolt against the wasterels in Washington.

Try being self-employeed and having to file quarterly estimates and returns. It sucks and I am glad I don't have to do it any more.

CL
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »