On 2005-07-11 23:35:00, Anonymous wrote:
"Nihilanthic, the first part of your post was real cool and I agreed with it based on what I saw at Straight -- restraints were used on people who simply wouldn't flap their arms or who resisted other people having their hands on them, making them sit up and be a Straight robot. (Straight even coerced clients to grab hold of someone's head and turn it in the direction of the person speaking, because that was the constant rule, everyone had to be looking at the person speaking.)
However, I am not sure if you are saying that a supine restraint is "safe" and therefore not damaging. I just wanted to say that when I was restrained in a five-point restraint at Straight, Inc., by other clients who were coerced into restraining me, it was a supine restraint with one person on each limb and one person at my head. I experienced the same terror and emotional trauma that you described in the second paragraph of your post there.
Does anyone know what the restraint technique was that they used in communist or Korean brainwashing camps? "
Any restraint done improperly can be damaging! A 5 on one supine restraint can stil be ridiculous even though you happen to be facing up! That said, it would have been a lot worse if you were facing down, mentally and potentially physically. Your head would be forced to the side so you didnt squish your nose, breathing would have been harder, and your neck would have quickly been strained. Plus, not being able to see or breathe would just compound any stress you already had.
Holding your HEAD is simply ridiculous, and the fact that other straight clients did it is just asking for injury. Just because a restraint is supine doesnt mean its actually 'good', but its one of the pre-requisites of making a restraint that won't terrify and injure someone - see what I mean? That said, Im really sorry that you had to go through that. That must have been awful to go through as a kid without knowing whats going on.
BTW, whats this straddle hold supposed to look like? I havent heard of it (probably becuase its inapplicable to fighting with it :silly:) but does it help prevent injuries to the restrain-ee? Is it like this?
http://www.judo-for-all.com/Theory/Theo ... gatame.htmThats less likely to injure someone unless the seme (er, the restrainer in judo terminology) puts his bodyweight on the restrained person. However, having someone hulking on top of you would freak out he average person. Id rather see one of those PROPERLY done (note how the head is free) than a 5 on one supine spread eagle straight-do hold. At least their BODY wouldnt be fucked up even though they'd probably be terrified and humilated :sad:
And as far as restraints used in POW camps, Id imagine it consisted of being whipped or smacked around with a rifle butt or a stick, or maybe the captors wanted to practice whatever Judo or Yuudo (Korean MAs tend to copy Japanese MAs, go fig) they learned without having to care if they damage their 'uke' in the process.
In the end, just leaving the damn kid alone would do a lot more good than restraining the perosn. If theyre not hurting themselves or anyone else, leave em alone!
Drug War tells us everyone's body is common property
to be managed by the central government for our own
good, even if it kills us. This is Communism!
Drug Policy Foundation of Texas
--Bob Ramsey