What is a concern is students who are now away from the day-to-day control of Mark and Cheryl Sudweeks; but who still speak up and defend them about matters of which they have no direct proof: For instance, Whitmore Alumni defends the Sudweeks and says they didn't abuse Joey...when this student was not there, and has no way of personally knowing what happened to this young boy.
Whitmore Alumni was just confronted by another former student who says "yes I was there when Leah's horse arrived!"
Chris G. has admitted to abusive acts against students at Whitmore, but dismisses it calling the abused students "cry babies," or "pussies," and WORSE. Perhaps if he had been on the receiving end of the abuse, he'd have cried like a "pussy" too. OR, perhaps he is tough, and could have taken it.
I'd like to see the Sudweeks defend themselves in a court of law, and not have them depend on kids to defend their cowardly acts.
