On 2005-04-22 16:35:00, Libra wrote:
"Any positive reinforcement or reward system is so insignificant as to be inconsequential. I don't think it takes B.F.Skinner to see that. "
This statement is pretty well divorced from reality.
Time and time again, it has been shown that positive reinforcement is the best way to achieve lasting change in behavior.
In fact, B.F. Skinner himself HAS documented this phenomenon. Rats that were trained to press a lever (behavior) to recieve food (positive reinforcement) learned the behavior rapidly and continued to exercise the conditioned response (lever press) for long after the reinforcement ceased.
In addition, Skinner also showed the poor conditioning effects of negative reinforcement (i.e. the REMOVAL of an UNPLEASANT STIMULUS upon the performing of the desired behavior). Rats were trained to press a lever to alleviate an electic shock delivered to them in the "Skinner Box." When the electric stimulus was halted by the examiner, so was the conditioned response (lever-pressing).
Now, in the context of BM "schools" like HLA: Children are berated and abused until the desired behavior emerges (i.e. indefinite "restrictions" were lifted upon "conformance.") This is the same as "negative reinforcement" (the removal of an unpleasant stimulus when the desired response is generated). This model is proven ineffective in rats and humans.
Positive reinforcement systems such as a "Token Economy," in which the subject earns "credits" (tokens) for desired behaviors and can later redeem those credits for privileges that they enjoy (a new book, tv time, a game of billiards, etc) are some of the MOST EFFECTIVE forms of shaping behavior. The token economy, coupled with strong "modeling" by adults works best for these kids.
Also, it has been proven incontrovertibly that IGNORING an undesired behavior is the fastest route to EXTINGUISHING it.
So, any intelligent person can see that strong modeling, positive reinforcement and ignoring undesired behaviors is the MOST EFFICIENT and EFFECTIVE treatment modality.
HLA, in contrast, has WEAK MODELING (counselors yelling, screaming, calling names, changing rules to suit their ends, giving drugs/cigs/dip to favored kids, etc.), NEGATIVE REINFORCEMENT("punishment" until desired behavior results, which is NOT LASTING, as referenced above), and ATTENDANCE to undesired behavior (confrontation and punishment) which actually REINFORCES the undesired behavior by rewarding the subject with attention.
THEREFORE, it is ineffective at best, DAMAGING at worst.
It doesn't take B.F. Skinner to see that, now does it...?