Author Topic: What about "Carlbrook School"?  (Read 89930 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline psy

  • Administrator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 5606
  • Karma: +2/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://homepage.mac.com/psyborgue/
Re: What about
« Reply #255 on: January 04, 2010, 10:52:51 PM »
Quote from: "that guy"
You cant change their minds and they cant change yours.
That's very much not true. I've seen it happen many times on this forum, quite dramatically.  I would say, however that it often requires a certain amount of respect in the exchange.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Benchmark Young Adult School - bad place [archive.org link]
Sue Scheff Truth - Blog on Sue Scheff
"Our services are free; we do not make a profit. Parents of troubled teens ourselves, PURE strives to create a safe haven of truth and reality." - Sue Scheff - August 13th, 2007 (fukkin surreal)

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #256 on: January 05, 2010, 12:16:42 AM »
Charly is a good example of a change of mind. Used to be a total kool-aid chugger for Carlbrook, now she's reformed and back to drinking scotch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Brand[On]

  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #257 on: April 03, 2010, 04:59:21 AM »
whoops
« Last Edit: May 25, 2010, 02:20:39 PM by Brand[On] »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #258 on: April 03, 2010, 07:09:34 AM »
Fascinating change of perspective. Would you mind sharing what prompted you to reconsider your original position?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #259 on: April 03, 2010, 07:10:44 AM »
Oh yeah, and about an hour or two after I made that snarky comment about Charly being back to scotch she sent me a torpedo via facebook grousing about her dislike for scotch.

Just thought I'd throw that out there for you all.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Brand[On]

  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #260 on: April 03, 2010, 09:55:11 AM »
how embarassing
« Last Edit: May 25, 2010, 02:21:44 PM by Brand[On] »

Offline Charly

  • Posts: 262
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #261 on: April 03, 2010, 11:52:45 PM »
But after touring the Jack Daniels distillery today, I'm going to try to develop a taste for whiskey- will start with Jack and Bourbon.  No Scotch.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Che Gookin

  • Global Moderator
  • Newbie
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
  • Karma: +11/-3
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #262 on: April 06, 2010, 03:59:07 AM »
Jim Beam is better.

:)

Nice seeing you drop by Charly.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline free_speech

  • Posts: 5
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #263 on: April 30, 2010, 02:31:08 AM »
I'm a Carlbrook graduate from within the last five years.  I'm trying to remain relatively anonymous, because--for some reason--people have been getting pretty emotional on the topic.  I've seen this thread since I graduated, and have been very hesitant to post simply based on the negativity.  It seems like several people aren't willing to listen and accept others' experiences and are trying to convince the other that Carlbrook was a) fucked up or b) not fucked up whatsoever.  There have also been a few graduates who have been very eloquent and respectful in speaking, and it is greatly appreciated.

For anything that I say, if I'm incorrect on factual things please let me know.  As far as I can tell, the goal of the fornits forums is to spread awareness.  In the spirit of this awareness, I think it would be most helpful for alumni to share experiences; it seems like several people are coming, looking for some kind of closure to a strenuous, confusing journey.  I like the anonymity of the forums as I've read the informational side to the school and staff.  I don't think any one person contributing here is completely objective nor can possibly be due to the nature of what we're discussing.  One thing I don't like (but I guess it's unavoidable) is the ability for someone who graduates tomorrow to instantly find these forums in such a sensitive time; however, that may just be my opinion and others might deem it helpful.  In the end, I think we're all here trying to figure something out about our experience--but some may be here just to rag on Carlbrook, or defend it.

I do see Carlbrook as evolving.  From what I've heard from the people who've graduated before me, Carlbrook has changed drastically.  From what I've heard from people who graduated recently, Carlbrook is still changing drastically.  Psy has posted above that he thinks the intentions could be incredible, but may still be abusive.  I know this to be true, and I feel like Carlbrook has watered-down a bit of the intense workshop moments and even group moments.  I won't say that I'm "scarred" from some of the moments, but I probably won't forget them.  What I don't see is Carlbrook moving toward individualization.  I wouldn't go far enough and call it "cookie-cutter," but I understand the metaphor.  In my experience, the relationships with advisers were highly personal, but I don't think there was enough creativity in the process.

I don't love Carlbrook.  I thought I did when I left; ironically, I also thought I hated it, too.  It was a very confusing time for me.  It's funny that I've chosen to drink after Carlbrook and people really act like it's some form of "sinner's juice" and that I'm drinking liquid death that goes against the entire fabric of what I stood for at Carlbrook.  While I've read the definition of "cult" provided, I don't like that choice of word, because it has such a loaded connotation, however I do feel like graduates can really act in a herd mentality, but only time washes away the collective soul; I hesitate to use the word "brainwashed" for the same reason.  I say this, and I really haven't been out of the program all that long.

As for Tim Brace, I've read the history of CEDU and the skeleton of the program in circulation today.  It seems like Tim has changed his mentality from some of the experiences shared before, but, as Psy has repeated often, he is still carrying around the CEDU model.  He's not without fault.  My biggest criticism would be that he tries to be everyone's friend too much--which might be quite different from the earlier complaints about him.  However, Tim directly helped me, and I think he genuinely wants to help people the full of his extent.  I think that is the weird vibe that people get.  He's so open and touchy that people don't know how to deal with him.

As for the explanation of "tools" to Psy, the word just refers to anything learned in a workshop--whether a phrase, personal word,  (truth; lie; negative statement) small activity, etc.

I'll post more later, but I haven't slept in a while.  Feel free to reply.  If you don't grace me with respect, I probably won't reply to you at all.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline formerstudent06

  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #264 on: May 12, 2010, 05:39:12 AM »
The bottom line is that this is not an appropriate place to be having these discussions. If you seriously believe that you have been abused, mentally, or in any other way, it needs to be discussed over a long period of time with a trusted professional. Now its very easy to view a trusted professional as one who is going to give you the answers to the conflicts in your head as you want to hear them. Try to find the most objective therapist that you can, and just start talking. He/she can tell you if it was actual abuse based on the way that it has individually effected you since graduating, and then you can work toward resolving whatever conflicts became of it. But vomiting your emotional shit all over an internet webpage, which is interesting mixed with both carlbrook grads (old and new; who had positive or even extremely negative experiences to the point of calling it abuse,) and grads from other schools and perspective parents, not to mention certain posts demonstrating the emotional maturity of a 12 year old on both sides of the fence, this is just bullshit guys and gals. I'm not saying that what you have to say is bullshit. This just isn't the place to do it. Many of you have revealed private information about people that is entirely inappropriate to have done in such a place, made comments that basically discredit your entire point by displaying a truly saddening level of internal conflict. I must say that reading this entire forum, which I just did tonight, from beginning to end, and its now 5 in the morning, has somewhat altered my perspective on Carlbrook. But anything that I take away from this, I am gonna talk about with my therapist, one that I trust, one that has an objective view. O was a grad pf may 06, saw the beginning of suspension, although wasn't a part of it, and therefore cannot comment about the possible damage that it has done to you. And at the same time, I understand that a story of my somewhat positive experience doesn't have anything to do with the Carlbrook that you experienced when in suspension. We all went through it as individuals and experienced individually, which means that nobody can discount the feelings you had while you were there. If you feel like you were abused, then you feel like you were abused. If you feel like you were brainwashed, then you feel like you were brainwashed. If you feel that it was helpful to you, then you feel that it was helpful to you. Only time will truly tell, as long as you engage yourself in introspection alongside an independent source. I feel like the person who said ( sorry I can't remember you username) that they were 41 and only beginning to understand how their program had an effect on them. I will say that I am certain programs were conducted very differently back then and feel that there was a much higher potential for more serious abuse at those programs, and that does not mean that the possible abuse you feel you suffered at carlbrook was any less significant. Just seek objective help, please. Nothing healing is gonna come from this reckless spouting.
To the people who maintained a level of respect in their posts, I thank you. They were a lot let frustrating to read. But for people calling Tim a pedophile, and the earlier comments about him spooning with a kid on the couch, that's just outrageous and childish. Whether Tim does in fact still have problems today and has committed acts that would be deemed as crimes (I did a quite extensive search while reading through this forum to find any evidence that he had, which came up negative but does not totally discount the possibility) by saying that you would be incurring the same type of abuse on him that you are stating the he has done to you. Lets grow up a little bit here. Shouting someone's darkness in their face because they shouted yours in your own face makes you no better than them. Its a child's game. And as for the student he was spooning with, I am pretty sure that that child was me, whether that identifies me here or not, i don't care. But I will say that that was one of the safest times I ever felt at that school. It was a time when I needed my father, the hug from my father that makes me feel like nothing in the world could touch me, but he wasn't there to give it to me, Tim was. And whatever his secret motives might have been, the hug still meant the same thing for me as it would have from Jonathan, or from Hope Bowling, despite her intensely offensive remarks to me on several occasions. I still remember her giving me a hug, out of nowhere, when we were in the middle of not talking, an almost motherly instinct. That's what I felt with Tim at that time. And we were not fucking spooning, you twisted minded fucks. I urge you to stop seeing things the way you want to see them, and start working, with and objective professional, toward seeing them for the way they are. I don't even care if you have tripped 1000 times and your view of reality is so skewed that you hang out with the DMT machine elves. Try to come back. Not to the Carlbrook perspective, but to your own.
Its 5:40 am so time to sign off. Take care everyone. Much love
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Pile of Dead Kids

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 760
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #265 on: May 12, 2010, 08:01:19 AM »
So you liked it when he touched you, then.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
...Sergey Blashchishen, James Shirey, Faith Finley, Katherine Rice, Ashlie Bunch, Brendan Blum, Caleb Jensen, Alex Cullinane, Rocco Magliozzi, Elisa Santry, Dillon Peak, Natalynndria Slim, Lenny Ortega, Angellika Arndt, Joey Aletriz, Martin Anderson, James White, Christening Garcia, Kasey Warner, Shirley Arciszewski, Linda Harris, Travis Parker, Omega Leach, Denis Maltez, Kevin Christie, Karlye Newman, Richard DeMaar, Alexis Richie, Shanice Nibbs, Levi Snyder, Natasha Newman, Gracie James, Michael Owens, Carlton Thomas, Taylor Mangham, Carnez Boone, Benjamin Lolley, Jessica Bradford's unnamed baby, Anthony Parker, Dysheka Streeter, Corey Foster, Joseph Winters, Bruce Staeger, Kenneth Barkley, Khalil Todd, Alec Lansing, Cristian Cuellar-Gonzales, Janaia Barnhart, a DRA victim who never even showed up in the news, and yet another unnamed girl at Summit School...

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #266 on: May 12, 2010, 10:10:07 AM »
Quote from: Pile of Dead Kids
So you liked it when he touched you, then.
Quote

 :shamrock:
« Last Edit: May 12, 2010, 10:13:37 AM by DannyB II »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline DannyB II

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 3273
  • Karma: +5/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #267 on: May 12, 2010, 10:12:21 AM »
Quote from: "Pile of Dead Kids"
So you liked it when he touched you, then.

 :shamrock:  :shamrock:
 
Pile was that necessary......?

Danny
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Stand and fight, till there is no more.

Offline formerstudent06

  • Posts: 4
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about
« Reply #268 on: May 12, 2010, 01:16:12 PM »
Pile, you really are fucking sick. The worst I ever felt abused there was by the student's, ones just like you. I will no longer take part in this forum.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: What about "Carlbrook School"?
« Reply #269 on: May 12, 2010, 01:38:05 PM »
Quote from: "formerstudent06"
The bottom line is that this is not an appropriate place to be having these discussions. If you seriously believe that you have been abused, mentally, or in any other way, it needs to be discussed over a long period of time with a trusted professional. Now its very easy to view a trusted professional as one who is going to give you the answers to the conflicts in your head as you want to hear them. Try to find the most objective therapist that you can, and just start talking. He/she can tell you if it was actual abuse based on the way that it has individually effected you since graduating, and then you can work toward resolving whatever conflicts became of it. But vomiting your emotional shit all over an internet webpage, which is interesting mixed with both carlbrook grads (old and new; who had positive or even extremely negative experiences to the point of calling it abuse,) and grads from other schools and perspective parents, not to mention certain posts demonstrating the emotional maturity of a 12 year old on both sides of the fence, this is just bullshit guys and gals.
Hmm. Why do you feel compelled to direct others as to how they should deal with their experiences? These are, after all, their experiences, and their parsing of those experiences, at issue here...
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------