My My My,
?[threat] to expose a secret or publicize an asserted fact, whether true or false,
I don't recall anyone threatning to devuldge a "secret". That would mean publically disclosing (of course, if there were no secrets, there is nothing to divuldge but I digress). However, if one was questioned on the matter and they simply stated the truth in a legal setting than that is hardly publically disclosing. However, many legal proceedings are then made public record and subsequently often are seen on the internet. Many depositions are on the internet.
I am unclear on who "Miss ISAC" is or why you would refer to that.
The Bigger Question here seems to be why are you defending and or enjoying a lawsuit against survivors? One who truly has empathy for their position does not enjoy in any hardship given to them. Truly anyone with any compassion for another does not enjoy nor feel the need to publish the business of another.
I do not know the individuals at ISAC very well but I have seen the good that they have done. I believe your daughter was saved by them if I am not mistaken.
Again, the issue here is WWASP suing survivors the rantings of a gossip are in my opinion, just that rants.
Furthermore, to wit; there has been no such disclosure of any "secret" or "asserted fact". Further, there has been NO threat to do so. I believe the individual was simply stating that they felt it terriably inappropriate for you (one who Claims to be against abusive rehabilitation) to in fact enjoy a lawsuit against a child rights group. I believe they indicated that you had NOT done anything. As for the publically divuldging of secrets I am sure that the individual does not hold the corner on that market in these circles.
So tell me, why is WWASP suing a survivor of all people? Since you seem to know so much on the case, do enlighten us.
Old Parent
