Author Topic: URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS  (Read 2078 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« on: March 10, 2005, 07:04:00 PM »
[Confidential material deleted]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2005, 10:33:00 PM »
moderated by nobody?

i was under the impression that this was an open forum?

what's up with the deleted info?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2005, 02:07:00 AM »
i know for a fact that the sudweeks never posted. they dont even go to this site. but they werent even home tonight.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2005, 12:05:00 PM »
and joyce TRIES to do it again
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2005, 12:16:00 PM »
Exactly WHO is being investigated for child and sexualy abuse? The Sudweeks, right!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2005, 12:30:00 PM »
umm the sudweeks are not  being investigated anymore, when the police realize how dumb that accusation was they dropped that case, its no longer even in question.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2005, 12:44:00 PM »
the letter that was deleted obviously had truths behind it or it would still be here. i saw it. joyce had some admissions there that i am sure she doesnt want pple to read. it really slants her previous statements and actually sheds a lot of light for both sides. poor zita. her mother enjoys so much exposing her here. it was wrong to post it, but it also showed another side. possbily the real truth behind the joyce truth.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Gmom

  • Posts: 193
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2005, 05:12:00 PM »
That e-mail to Mark was helping to explain Joyce's daughter's problem at Mark's and David's request.  Maybe you should do a little research on the disorder suffered by that litttle girl.  This is not a contest.  The Sudweeks still did what they did.  They were the adults, they were the ones responsible.  It doesn't matter what that little girl did or any other kid there.  

It is the Sudweeks that is exposing this child, not the mother.  What kind of people put on a public forum the confidential communications regarding a minor child?  This is a display of LOVE OF CHILDREN.  Pleeeezzzzzzzzzzzz!  I am beginning to think they use that word way too freely.  I am of the opinion they don't even know what it means.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Gmom

  • Posts: 193
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2005, 05:12:00 PM »
That e-mail to Mark was helping to explain Joyce's daughter's problem at Mark's and David's request.  Maybe you should do a little research on the disorder suffered by that litttle girl.  This is not a contest.  The Sudweeks still did what they did.  They were the adults, they were the ones responsible.  It doesn't matter what that little girl did or any other kid there.  

It is the Sudweeks that is exposing this child, not the mother.  What kind of people put on a public forum the confidential communications regarding a minor child?  This is a display of LOVE OF CHILDREN.  Pleeeezzzzzzzzzzzz!  I am beginning to think they use that word way too freely.  I am of the opinion they don't even know what it means.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
URGENT ABOUT JOYCE HARRIS
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2005, 05:50:00 PM »
gmom,
i seems like the mother, joyce has completely disclosed her innocent child. who started this whole forum? think about it. i am curious, i am sort of new here, but seems you are leah's gmom. in most cases grandparents get involve, they usually have a scrap with there daughter or son? which is it, leah's mom or dad that is your child? i think you are directing your anger here when it is really at them for sending her.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »