Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore
Theat Made By Cheryl
Gmom:
This is a message for Cheryl.
Cheryl, what did you mean, exactly, when you talked to Leah on the phone February 13th, 2005, about 4:00 or 5:00 in the afternoon, when you said, "You are really going to get it, if you don't shut up about everything"? I don't know about anyone else, but to me that sounds like a real direct threat to Leah. Shame on you, a grown woman, mother and grandmother, threatening an 18-year-old girl. I feel sorry for your children and your grandchildren, what an example you are to them!!!! :sad: :sad: :sad:
Antigen:
*57, folks! And keep a log.
The government is much more interested in preserving the purity of its ideology than it is in allowing patients to get effective medicine.
-- Ethan B. Russo, neurologist at Western Montana Clinic
--- End quote ---
Antigen:
How come no one wants to answer GMom's question? She's not the only one reporting phone harassment. And I've seen threats against this girl and others posted to this forum.
What's up w/ that? What's your opinion, Whitmore Alumni? Will you answer that question?
Nother question. This is something I've wondered about. It's an opinion question, as I don't think there's an objective right or wrong answer to be had.
I've heard tell that there's often a lot of shouting and rough language and threats used at Whitmore. And, as stated above, I've seen demonstrations of it posted around here. So I believe it.
What was different about the threats and shouting that happened at the theatre? Why did that set some people off? How was it any different from what goes on regularly in private? Was it just that it happened in public?
What's the deal w/ that?
Wicked men obey from fear, good men from love.
--Aristotle
--- End quote ---
Joyce Harris:
When we returned home with out daughter we received a very frightening phone call. It was from a Ben McQuivey. Our daughter said that he was the karate "teacher" at Whitmore and that she had 3 lessons from him. She said that she did not know how he knew what town we lived in, or how he knew her last name or our telephone number.
We can only assume that since he worked for the Sudweeks at the Whitmore, that he got our number from them, and since the "message" involved their name, I do believe our assumption is correct.
As usual we ask, why couldn't the Sudweeks deliver this frighten message themselves?
Anonymous:
The incident at the theatre at Provo got so out-of-hand that bystanders called the Provo police to the scene.
When a grown woman, Cheryl Sudweeks, starts physically attacking a minor boy, and is cursing him at the top of her lungs and is threatening him with a group of her "warriors from Whitmore"---it stands to reason that bystanders knew to call the police because this town-boy was in danger.
Cheryl Sudweeks was in charge of these Whitmore students for a movie outing.
When the police arrived, she got on the bus and instructed these students to lie on the police forms and say she did not physically hit the boy, and was not cursing him.
What is this about? I sure can't explain it.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version