« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: HORSE AT WHITMORE  (Read 8588 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #15 on: February 21, 2005, 09:53:00 PM »
People who abuse animals usually abuse children too.

This whole thing makes me sick.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #16 on: February 21, 2005, 10:07:00 PM »
Is anyone else tired of Mark Sudweeks whining and lying about the Animal Cruelty CONVICTION in Canada?

In his "Rebuttal to the SPCA Conviction" he states he "and my family had been in Baja for 3 months prior to the SPCA seizing the horses."

Now to me, at least, he wants people to believe he was in Mexico, and had not been near those horses in Canada for at least 3 months before the mean old Canadian SPCA said he was a bad guy right?

Well, in paragraph 11 of Regina V Sudweeks it states very clearly:
  "The court noted Mr. Sudweeks' evidence that when he returned to the lodge briefly on December 10-11, 2000 to pick up his plane, the horses and dogs were all in fine condition."

Guess he forgot he was up there in Canada afterall, huh?

Guess Mark Sudweeks just can't quit lying can he?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #17 on: February 22, 2005, 05:49:00 PM »
The posting on this site that states the Attorney General has dropped the investigation against the Sudweeks is NOT TRUE!!!!!!!!

The Attorney General only handles civil matters and is STILL investigating the Sudweeks for FRAUD etc.

The Sudweeks are still being investigated for child abuse and sexual abuse.

The Attorney General can be reached at
801 812-5205 to verify that the investigation for abuse has NOT BEEN DROPPED!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #18 on: February 24, 2005, 08:05:00 PM »
Why hasn't Mark Sudweeks, or one of his spokes-people explained why he lied about being up in Canada on Dec. 10-11th.

He claims in that letter that he was in Mexico for the 3 months prior to this horse incident in Canada.

Why can he make a statement that does not hold water, and then just back off, without even an "oh guess I was confused."
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #19 on: February 25, 2005, 10:48:00 PM »
Why haven't the Sudweeks made public the report from the SPCA.

The SPCA was at Whitmore on February 15, 2004 checking on the horses.

It would seem if it was a POSITIVE REPORT that it would be posted everywhere!

Another little dark secret here?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #20 on: February 26, 2005, 04:20:00 PM »
Mark,

What about being up there in Canada on Dec..10-11th?

Huh?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #21 on: March 06, 2005, 01:22:00 PM »
On the Staff Sheet the Sudweeks show 5...FIVE!!
people teaching Horsemanship!

Now with that many people in charge of horses,
why didn't someone know that horse was sick?
Why didn't one or two, or maybe FIVE of these professional HORSEMEN get a VET out there to tend to this horse and make sure it didn't die in October 2004???

Why?

Let's not be blaming a student, a child--OK?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #22 on: March 07, 2005, 11:53:00 AM »
Wonder what the Vet will say that horse died from in October 2004?  And its a lot like the Canada Abuse deal. The Sudweeks just happened to be at Lake Powell when this poor animal died. So, sure hope one of the daughters wasn't in charge, or she will be blamed for this TOO.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline schacherer

  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #23 on: March 07, 2005, 05:04:00 PM »
well while i was at the whitmore casies horse was always sick, she bought the horse from trinity, maybe trinity sold casie the horse because she did not want to deal with all of the vet bills? also the horse never had the vet come out and look at it, the horse had been sick since last winter and never one vet came out to look at her while i was there. Cheyl just had trinity "jr. horse whisperer" look at it and diagnos its problems.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline schacherer

  • Posts: 19
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #24 on: March 07, 2005, 05:05:00 PM »
maybe the horsemanship teachers didnt know because one of them is only 17!!!! and none of them are trained nor have gone to school for veternary medicine
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline BuzzKill

  • Posts: 1815
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #25 on: March 07, 2005, 06:22:00 PM »
Any reason why a vet wasn't called out for a horse that had been sick since winter?
And is this the horse that died with Colic?
Anybody know what kind of colic?
Anyone want to jump in here and explain why a vet wasn't called out for a horse with colic?
Someone beside me want to explain why it is cruel and grossly negligent to let a horse in colic go with out a vet's care?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Gmom

  • Posts: 193
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #26 on: March 07, 2005, 06:33:00 PM »
Well, I guess that is the BIG question here.  A horse with colic has obvious symptoms -- "HORSE" people should recognize these symptoms, and call a vet.  Sounds like it didn't happen in the case of Casie's horse.  WHY NOT???????  Anyone know?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #27 on: March 08, 2005, 01:32:00 AM »
Mr. Fox with the SPCA is sure checking it out. He was there not long ago, and is clearly aware that this horse died in OCT 2004 and that the Sudweek diagnosis is "colic." He is trying to contact one of the two Vets the Sudweeks claim they have on the "payroll."  I don't believe this one can just be explained away quite so easily. A horse doesn't just die.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #28 on: March 10, 2005, 10:33:00 AM »
NOw we have the biggest Sudweek "LET'S DEFLECT ALL ATTENTION OFF THIS HORSE THAT DIED IN OCTOBER DEAL GOING YET!!!!!"

Mark Sudweeks has actually filed a suit against this young girl who came and removed HER horse that legally belonged to HER---she has papers on this horse to prove it mind you!

And this girl had a Nephi Police officer with her on a Sunday morning to pick up the horse.
OF COURSE--she is LIED about an accused of picking it up AT NIGHT, and of leaving the gate open and a bunch of other nonesense.

AND the Sudweeks had use of HER HORSE all these months for the kids at Whitmore to ride, for FREE.

Now Mark Sudweeks had filed a $5,000 suit against this college girl!

Well- that still DOES NOT TAKE THE FOCUS OFF THE ISSUE OF THIS HORSE THAT DIED IN OCTOBER!
People are still waiting for Mr. Fox to report why this horse died...and why the Sudweeks just can't take care of animals properly (NOT TO MENTION KIDS) that they are suppose to be in charge of.

The issue is still there: Why did this helpless animal die?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
HORSE AT WHITMORE
« Reply #29 on: March 10, 2005, 01:05:00 PM »
I am not a vet, but have been around horses all my life. Horses colic for a variety of reasons, the most likely cause is their feed. They can colic from moldy hay, hay that is too rich, too much grain, an abrupt change in the type of feed, etc. Horses have a very poor digestive system so when they have any type of problem with their stomach or intenstines it is very serious. When they have colic (a bad belly ache), their first instinct is to lie down and roll around. If they are allowed to do this their intestines can become twisted around one another and then only surgery can fix the problem. Many horses die from this ailment, even if they are given prompt care. It also seems to be true that once a horse colics it is more likely to colic again in the future, so many horses are sold cheap because of their tendancy to do this. Horses are prone to a variety of ailments related to food and exercise, colic is just one of them.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »