Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Who Am I Discovery/Whitmore
HORSE AT WHITMORE
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2005-02-19 09:32:00, Anonymous wrote:
"She neglected it and it died."
--- End quote ---
Of all the "crap" on this site, this is the most obsurd and unbelievable thing I have read yet! Anyone and everyone who knew and knows Casie would never believe that!! That horse was everything to her. Amazingly, she was at Powell when the horse became ill under the care of kids left behind and a local community member. I also know she begged to stay behind due to her horse not seeming right. She was told no. Anyone who has experience with horses knows signs of Colic and how to treat it. Ironically, her horse had suffered with it before and she saved it. When she returned from Powell it was too late to save the horse!! Sound familiar to the Canada proceedure?? Leave the care to others and then blame someone else for the damage. How did I know that this would be the response, always someone else's fault with cutting, hurtful accusations. Hopefully Casie will never read this or hear about it. I know she does not participate in this site! Wow, truely unbelievable the depth of hatred and destruction some are capable of. One last thing to consider... how could 1 horse be neglected at the direction of 1 child in the midst of several other horses and care of several adults?? Wouldn't you think these horse lovers would not have allowed neglect by 1 child to 1 horse?? Food for thought....no pun intended!
Anonymous:
I would think the Sudweeks would print this "Satisfactory/Good//Perfect" report about these horses from the SPCA inspector to put everyone's mind at ease.
SURELY after all the stories they have put out about those helpless horses and dogs in Canada, they can not expect anyone to belief THEIR WORD that everything is OK with these horses in Utah.
Sorry on this one. The Sudweeks will just have to prove that those horses are in good condition.
Anonymous:
See Mark Sudweeks' Letter:
"Rebuttal to the SPCA Conviction"
under What about the animal abuse? thread
2/21/05
Antigen:
In my view, the following is the most salient excerpt of the entire proceedings as far as the topic of these forums go:
--- Quote ---Apeal transcript
Mr. Tetz failed when he did not "blow the whistle". He listened to his sister who told him not to do that because it might cause troubles for the Sudweeks.
--- End quote ---
In the event that some of the kids at Whitmore are being mistreated, would Tetz or anyone else in the Sudweeks' good graces defend the kids or the Sudweeks?
What experiences and history teach is this-that people and government never have learned anything from history, or acted on principles deduced from it.
--G.W.F Hegel (1770-1831)
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Antigen, your question goes right to the heart of the issue.
That is the make-up of "the program." The Sudweeks MUST be protected, not the kids.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version