Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > CEDU / Brown Schools and derivatives / clones

My intentions

<< < (4/18) > >>

ottawa5:
Ok, this is too hilarious to let go by.  I'm a mole for CEDU with no real son, according to the theory put out at the moment by this poster.

Doesn't it occur to you that if this were the case, if I was here for some espionage or other devious purpose, and you wanted to hear from my son (the one you don't believe I have), I would just make one up, i.e. enter as him under Anon or some other registered name?  

Or, since moles, apparently, according to this site's mythology, are all over the place, quite numerous at the least, I would get one of my fellow moles to enter as him.

When I have a far-fetched hypothesis about something, and we all do now and then, I think it helps in keeping connected with reality, to step back a bit and say to one's self "Is this reasonable, or are my biases (a blind hatred of someone, a desire to look clever, a wish to be important enough that big organizations are spying on you) clouding my judgment?

CEDU IS A CULT:
Shut the fuck up!  You are a fucking mole and you can't deny it!!

I don't care what you say with your craftily worded insults.

Your a fucking mole so FUCK OFF!!

If I'm wrong, then your one of the biggest pieces of shit a human being I've ever met!

Disgusting.

Why don't you go on to a holocaust survivor site and belittle them?

Why don't you?

Because we all suffered TREMENDOUSLY at the hands of CEDU and we're sick of you're belitling us and our issues.

Or maybe you're right and we're all wrong.

It makes me fucking IRATE how you can come on this site and
question and belittle our experiences!!

Like I said, I liken it to you going on to a holocaust survivor's site and belitling and downplaying their experiences.

You make me fucking SICK!!!

You and everyone of your mentality!!

I only wish I could blame it on your ignorance.

Now let me guess at your response:

"I can only think it hilarious how you could become so irate at one person's opinion.  Maybe, you are frightened that you could be wrong and that CEDU was good for some people.  You're experience is not indicative of the majority's experience.  CEDU was a very positive experience for me and my son. Furthermore, you complain that I bellittle people and yet you constantly throw vulgar insults at me. It is clear that you are childish and immature. To answer the question of the holocaust site: Of course I would never go on to a holocaust site and downplay their experiences.  But, it's hysterical how you can compare your experiences at CEDU to the holocaust. It seems to me that it is you who wish to live in ignorance."

You are transparent and predictable.

ottawa5:
Very nicely done, it had me laughing, you are a clever writer.

But I am not a CEDU mole and I think you know it.

Anonymous:
Bryan,
Ottawa is definitely offensive with her insidious disregard for the abuses of CEDU and the pain it causes. Who knows if she is a mole, she is obviously a provocateur, so maybe we should just ignore her.

I think she enjoys your vitriolic posts because she rationalizes her defense of CEDU and can just write you off as an angry schmuck. Now, we all know that if someone is abused or raped or beaten, we would all have GREAT difficulty dealing with a person who said it never happened.  That is why many of us dislike Ottawa so much.

I've wasted a lot of words on her, someone who continually dismisses our issues and writes off our pertinent concerns.  

In any event, perhaps she would be ideally suited for the business of CON Ed...excuse me, ed con, for CEDU.

Cypress:
"Look, you attitude, coming on all angry and frantic at me for no reason, is frustrating, and if you want to fight, I will try to ignore you when I can and take you on if I just can't ignore what you say. Although I'm pretty good at ignoring things, getting better all the time here, so you don't have to worry about too much interaction if you continue on as you have starated."

So Ottawa, you claim I have no basis for being "angry and frantic".  I think I stated pretty well in my initial post just why you tick me off.  Why must you continually discount my feelings?  Have you not learned a thing from your Cedu programming?

"If on the other hand, you want to communicate like an adult who is speaking to another adult who happens to have a differing opinion on a matter that is important to them both, I will always be willing to put the past behind and talk."

Please point out just what part of my dialogue is not "adult like".  Are adults not not prone to yelling when getting angry?  Do adults not use foul language? Please share with me exactly what makes for "adult" conversation so that I can be honored by your dialogue.  After all, this forum is all about you and rules that you deem appropriate.  I guess if the rest of us are going to participate we need to find out just what "agreements" we must follow so as to not offend you.

 "just that you didn't approve of me and my son on the basis of information in some quite current posts."

Sorry, but when did I say that I don't approve of your son?  I would actually be delighted to have him onboard.  

And finally, I will ask again, simply because you suggest that I do so, why exactly are you here?  What are your motives?  Why do you feel that you fit in here?  I have read somewhere that you are studying psychology and are interested in starting your own program.  Is this correct?  If so, what do you gain by discounting our experiences?  How exactly does this method of yours gain you any insight into how to start your own program?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page