Author Topic: AARC  (Read 20376 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Hamiltonf

  • Posts: 188
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #15 on: July 12, 2004, 11:51:00 PM »
That's all right, it was pretty obvious anyway.

I'm sure that all those millions across the Anglo-Saxon world who subscribe to the AA, NA & Synaon view of things still do not understand that they have really been sold a bill of goods.  

You see, it all goes back to the Puritans who left England (where I was born) to escape persecution and decadence. They invented the Great American Way of providing answers to ultimate questions which you will find reflected in a great deal of American Literature.  As my American Literature Prof ( from Harvard) would say from Miss Lonelyhearts, I believe it was -- there is a string of thought running through the American Psyche that will claim that "X  is the answer" . Now , X can be whatever you want it to be   -- Christ, Mormonism, Free market, even communism, the fact is that the intelligencia of the US with some exceptions seek to provide answers.  

The problem is, that nobody is sure of what the question is in the first place.

It's in the definition of the problem that the supporters of these cults(for CEDU and AARC are, indeed, cults)are fundamentally at odds with the reality of drugs as they may be used and/or  abused.  You see it's a question of definition.   Is marijuana a drug of abuse or a drug that is useful?  How about LSD?  While your child, dear Ottawa5 may have been "cured" by these cults and gone on to greater things in terms of a money grubbing career in medicine, mine has become enlightened by her experiences with "illicit" drugs, --mushrooms, LSD pot, and the writings of Alexander Shulgin, and has embarked upon a career  much more helpful to those with misconceived notions of the efficacy of those psychotropic drugs being palmed off on an unsuspecting public by the pharmaceutical companies that seem to control all the information your child may now seek to prescribe.  Let's see -- valium, (or benzodiazepines) still being prescribed, still highly addictive, still the cause of impairment after how many years?  Oh  -- and SSRI's still prescribed for children in N. America yet banned in Britain.  All of these drugs always an "answer" to some "problem" defined by the pharmaceutical companies

But I digress.    

You see, in defining all none approved drug use as abuse (the DEA definition) you are saying that   you have the answer, and the answer is --- abstention and if not done voluntarily, then by coercion.

This is not to say that some drug use does not have associated harms.  It may, and often does.    But it's in the definition of the problem that the real harm lies.  Why, because, going back to the Puritans, it hearkens back to the old adage that "X" is the answer when in fact the question remains unclear.

So, I have an answer for you....

The answer is 46.  Now tell me what the question was.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uote of the Year
The Bush administration has succeeded in making the United States one of the most feared and hated countries in the world. The talent of these guys is unbelievable. They have even succeeded at alienating Canada. I mean, that takes ge

Offline ottawa5

  • Posts: 144
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #16 on: July 13, 2004, 03:47:00 PM »
First things first.  If the parents who originally posted are still getting this, I reiterate that I, the poster called Ottawa5,  have been given no proof at all that you are not real. If you'd like to talk privately I give you my word that I will not refer in this forum to you, not in any way or in terms of what we talk about. Or even about the fact that you have contacted me. If you've gotten as much info as you need, either here or elsewhere, I wish you the best--you can turn this thing around.

Now to the lawyer, I can't be sure, but your comments might be taken to suggest that you are are a little off-base in terms of what you assume to be my points of view on certain cogent issues.

I couldn't agree with you more that many of the policies, laws, and presumptions that surround illegal drugs are short-sited and misguided---as a libertarian, if I were able to start the whole thing over. a case could be made for not having drug laws at all. And if I lived in a country where, say, marijuana was legal, and if an adult child of mine occasionally used it, without obsessive dependence on it or interference with living a full life, it would not be a great issue with me--although my own perspective is that there are better ways to feel good than dabbling in this kind of thing.

Without violating anyone's privacy, I can say that I know a number of CEDU grads and parents who feel as I do about the way society handles drug use--it's just that many people love their lives enough, and have enough other proirities that are central to their hopes and dreams: they are not going to play around with their futures either by taking a legal risk or in some cases a risk of over-use, just to recreate with some substance. If people like you are right that CEDU is a cult, and if you assume that it was supposed to program everyone to feel one way on issues like this, then it occurs to me that it's not a very good cult because I've seen a spectrum of different points of view on different aspects of the whole drug question, just among the CEDU people I know personally.

My above position is, however, a far cry from abdicating my parental responsibilties to keep a minor child from abusing his or her body and mind by heavy use of illegal, possibly impure street drugs. News flash for you: with lot of kids, drug use is not about enlightenment--it's about masking pain, defying authority, lack of control and moderation when something feels good, fitting in, among other reasons.

Of course the underlying questions (societal, personal and familial) as to why a child is behaving in certain ways need to be asked, but first the child must be made physically safe. Sometimes that means coercion. Making hard choices is part of being a grown-up. End of story.

I also believe that psychotropic medications are precribed way too much and without regard for safer alteratives. And there is no question that other alternatives do exist in many cases and can work with many people. Yet, on the other hand in my role as a clinical psychologist, I have seen people in whom their use has been fabulously successful and in whom nothing else has worked. Again, many of these issues do not lend themselves to black and white thinking.

Do I detect a touch of socialism (or as closet socialists like to say, democratic socialism) in your "money-grubbing" comment? If that is your ideological bent, it explains a lot. I was once married to one of those people, a Canadian actually.  Talk about cult-like thinking--- the old left agenda is pretty much buried here (although parts of the agenda surface in strange, local, sneaky ways more often than you'd expect) but I hear aspects of the whole perspective are alive and well in my country of origin.

Yes, I hope my son makes plenty of money especially if he works hard and earns it. Another news flash--money is good when come by honestly. I would wish that for any child, actually, I would wish that they find a way to live as well as they want to, while doing something they love.  

Key de-programming concept for recovering socialists: money is good, and wonderful things can be done with, especially when it is given freely, in the pursuit of a dream (as opposed to being extracted from its rightful owner by some blood-sucking government for someone else's idea of a "just" purpose).

In that light, too, I don't begrudge a good profit to companies or individuals who come up with useful products, including psychotropics, I am more interested in whether they are used in a way that helps, rather than hurts, people.

You say "we" are not asking the right questions--speak for your own part of "we" on that score. To me the "question" is obvious: how can I live to my full potential as a human being, keeping in mind what it means to me to be human? How can each of us?

This may involve directly helping others (willingly, not through politically based coercion) or it may involve ways of being more individually oriented in meeting one's particular potential. Among other things, it means understanding yourself and knowing where you fall on that individualist-collectivist spectrum, and it requires courage, and free-thinking, and a respect for liberty. I suppose the related question is how to reach that potential, but in my experience at least, if you know yourself, that tends to unfold, if not easily, then at least predictably.

As you can imagine, placing my son in a coercive program was a very grave thing for me ethicially, since liberty is one of my major values.  However his behavior was such that he illustrated fairly definitively that, not only was he at physical risk, he was in fact anything but free in the way that his life was going.  If he had been an adult I would have had no recourse legally or ethically--because he would have grown to an age at which he was make his choices as he pleased--as a child, he was my responsibilty.  

Somehow, perhaps it was instinct, I knew implicitly that I had a responsibility to act in my child's best interest--I am well aware there are some parents who do not seem to know the difference between being a child and parent--I only know that I could never be so uninvolved or uninformed or lazy or whatever makes them like that. I am just glad I knew what had to be done. And did it.

So if some people don't like the idea that we had a good CEDU experience, well, they might as well get used to it, it really would be indoctrination if I let other people control my understanding of my own experiences. Not much risk, fortunately, my personality is such that people I know laugh when I tell them that certain posters at this site think that CEDU could have brain-washed me!

So thanks for your interest in helping me with the "question" but I think I know what it is already.  I like puzzles though, so if "46" (I think that's what you said) is the answer, what is the question (beyond 23+23=)?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #17 on: July 13, 2004, 10:48:00 PM »
for anyone to even attempt to answer such a question, one would have to be aware of the true situation of your child. Is he or she a heroin addict? , or just experimenting with more than you are used to. Is the child rebelous or an outrite criminal? parents tend to get a bit in a  frenzy during their childs puberty and needs to be totally aware of the possible outcome of their child going into one of these "theraputic communities" WE can't totally control ones future as we would like to and sometimes need to let nature take its course. rehab and thought reform should not be confused. please dont take my comments as an attack as i am speaking from person experience.   sincerely, another synanon survivor
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hamiltonf

  • Posts: 188
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #18 on: July 13, 2004, 11:47:00 PM »
Uhhh? You don't know that the answer can be found in the hitch-hiker's guide to the galaxy?
As for my socialist tendencies
Now there's a red herring! and coming from a professed libertarean?  Surely you must know of Thomas Szasz's excellent works on the myths of Psychiatry!
Try http://www.szasz.com/iol20.html

then you might understand where I am coming from.

Try this as an example:

The date rape drug GHB.

Effective for dealing with narcolepsy and possibly sleep apnea, insomnia.  Addictive in a small, almost minuscule number of cases. But very useful also for treating alcoholics and weaning them from  withdrawal  Yes, in the hands of a small number of irresponsible, unscrupulous perverts, it can be slipped into an unsuspecting drinker's drink and whammo, not only can they be subject to non-consensual sex, but they can also die, especially if Medics are not trained in how to deal with people showing symptoms.
BUT   --- alcohol remains the date rape drug of choice.  AND GHB is prohibited because --- it is far more effective for a number of ailments including depression than  other drugs BIG PHARMA will offer you and it is also considerably cheaper to produce.  

And danger? -- well think of the dangerous drugs your son will be licensed to dispense and ask how much cover up there is of the unfavourable research that BIG PHARMA won't let your son near, and think of the free golfing weekends your son will have all fully paid for by the generous budgets afforded to the sales departments of BIG PHARMA.  And consider the factors that influence a child to take street drugs.  And compare the factors where a person with, say, mild feelings of anxiety will go to a GP and after a five minute interview be prescribed CELEXA; and consider that  when he goes back and complains that it makes it worse, the GP will say, "Oh, then try Effexor" .    And consider that when the individual says No, I don't want drugs, then and only then the GP says.  "perhaps you are drinking too much coffee, But I'll give you a prescription for Effexor anyway."      

So, who are the drug pushers here?  

And when it comes to these Cult adolescent treatment organizations, without exception the ones I have read about on this site fit that description.  And, oh, About AARC, I and my psychologist friend have watched both TV accounts that featured AARC.  One of them concentrated on WWASP and Barry Beyerstein was interviewed on it.  The other was solely focussed on AARC and was produced by David Suzuki who, (out of his area of expertise) thought it was the gretest thing since sliced bread.  My psychologist friend who specializes in dealing with real addicts couldn't bear to watch because it made him sick to his stomach that kids should be treated that way.  
Again the persons who started this thread did not say much about what they thought was so bad about their  childs behaviour that would require coerced treatment.  But again, I would suggest that the last people he should be talking to are AARC  because they will define ANY use of illicit drug as the cause of the problem even though upt o 30% of teenagers may have experimanted with illicit drugs.
So again, to those parents if they exist, define for us please, exactly what you consider the problem to be --- and above all, do not criminalize your child.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uote of the Year
The Bush administration has succeeded in making the United States one of the most feared and hated countries in the world. The talent of these guys is unbelievable. They have even succeeded at alienating Canada. I mean, that takes ge

Offline ottawa5

  • Posts: 144
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #19 on: July 14, 2004, 10:15:00 AM »
The parents looking for help for their child certainly should clarify in their own minds what they want to happen--there is a fighting chance, however, that the answers they are looking for are not going to be succinctly stated in "A Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy"!

However, I agree that once they get their son safely placed somewhere, they can start to investigate new and different ways of looking at life and their relationships, which may include such broad reading, not for indoctrination but for insight. That is certainly part of what I did while my son was at CEDU; actually he did a lot of reading there also; by his second year, he had started to read a bunch of classics and philosophical/ enlightenment type texts--I was astounded because he hated books at home--I'll have to ask him if he's read this one.

A person's world view is always important--- when life is not simple (ie most of the time), that perspective colors how we interpret ambiguous information, what we focus on in a complex situation, what we value most when values are in conflict.  

In fact, I don't totally disagree with much of what you say--it is just that I think you are missing a lot of subtle things that, at least in my mind, come into the equation, sometimes less, sometimes more.

That's why I just don't buy that all "coercive" programs are bad for all adolescents--again I know really nothing about AARC--it is possible that it is a program that is so completely ineffective that it is beyond redemption, but I would have to hear from people who had a variety of experiences with it before I could draw that kind of sweeping conclusion.

The thing is, schools,like any institutions, are run by people, and people are sometimes less than perfect--so the question becomes: are we talking about imperfection here or total, unmitigated evil or ineptitude--it isn't clear to me on the basis of what I've heard at this very polarized site. It just isn't a school I know much about.

I think we could probably agree that some things are all bad (murder, rape,maybe robbery, although socialists may see some robbery as justified).  We might even be able to find common ground in the fact that any program can be improved upon, or that some are so flawed that they are not worth trying--but the bottom line is that I believe that a) adults sometimes have to be in charge of children, and that sometimes means coercion b) children (including young teenagers should not be using illegal drugs (or drinking recreationally for that matter) not only because of legal constraints, but because they have other, more important psychological tasks to complete (and mind-alteration recreation is a true "red herring" for doing what they need to be doing to become fully functioning adults).

I know Thomas Szasz'work, read some of it in one of my psychopathology classes (our school offers a pretty broad survey of different points of view in psychology)and there is definitely something to it and a voice like his is needed in an overly medication-driven world.  His work contributes to my conceptualization of psychological functioning and will likely influence it with some clients at least.

Have not personally read the "Hitch-Hiker's Guide to the Galaxy" (a title that almost makes you hear the old love beads rattling!) but interestingly enough, I do recall that it was among a list of books recommended by one of the moderators in a CEDU parent work shop that I attended when my son was at school there. I may well have a look at it one of these days.

I met David Suzuki years ago at Carleton University. As I recall, he was between wives, which he talked about a lot during a lecture on something or other, and he and my husband, the Communist, got into a shouting match, with my husband calling him a "Nationalist" and him calling my husband a "Continentalist". Haven't heard the name for years, he is, I believe, much more well known in Canada than here.  Interesting that he approves of AARC, I wonder if he had personal experiences with it in his own family or if his opinion was just based on his own research into it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hamiltonf

  • Posts: 188
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #20 on: July 15, 2004, 08:26:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-07-01 20:13:00, ottawa5 wrote:

"

I suppose that I could accept unquestioningly the point of view that the individuals who could be called CEDU success stories are brainwashed. Yet several of these people are known to me reasonably well and I see no sign of delusion or dysfunction in the ways (which are appropiately individualized) in which they have gone on to live their lives after CEDU.



Puzzling, but then life is sometimes like that--I am confident that patience and further information will help to clarify the situation."


It shouldn't be that puzzling to people who have read Chomsky, and before that Willhelm Reich, on the "Mass Psychology of Fascism"  
You mentioned earlier something about my belief system being perhaps socialist.  Where brainwashing is concerned, it's not a question of belief systems, but of cold hard logic and science.  That's one reason I have so much difficulty accepting so many things that are dictated by "The Law".  True, there is a great deal of logic involved, but very little hard science, and Law does not base itself on scientifically validated data, but frequently on myths, propaganda and socially determined legislation.  With an unthinking media involved, this is how you have the manufacture of consent as Chomsky calls it.  
It's easy to see how the US, from the cold war onwards has fallen victim to brainwashing.  Brainwashing based on fear was the very foundation of Nazi Germany, and, today, of the American Bushist state.  Chomsky, again goes into this in his "Hegemony or Survival"  While he only mentions the drug war in passing in relation to the US involvement in, for example, Colombia, I would suggest that it is equally significant that once the Taliban agreed to ban poppy production in Afghanistan, the US were willing to ignore all the other incredible abuses being wrought by them, at least until 9/11.  The Cold War had been replaced by the War on (some) Drugs and only then the War on Terrorism.  But perhaps I'm getting too far afield.
The brainwashing of almost an entire population by Hitler was relatively easy following the Reichstag  fire.
It's been just as easy for Bush following 9/11, especially as the US has been on an almost constant war footing since WWII.  
In law we have a saying that some people "never let the facts get in the way of a good argument." other times "never let the Law get in the way of a good argument"
Bush succeeded in both in his immoral and illegal invasion of Iraq.
But it would never have been possible without the brainwashing of unfortunate Americans that had been taking place for years.
And that brainwashing included the Drug war based as it was on some very flawed thinking.  You, dear Ottawa5 must realise, if you have read John Stuart Mill that the drug war was what created victimless crimes.  
The indoctrination about the evils of drugs was so  complete that even many drug users came to believe that they were victims of "pushers"   The Demonization of pushers has come to be regarded as a universal truth (by pressure at the UN from the US) It was reflected in Steppenwolf in the 1970's "Goddam the Pusher man".  But almost inevitably the pushers that are arrested or entrapped are people at the low end of the scale and most often are doing friends a favour in dealing small amounts.  Sometimes they are addicts, but only sometimes.  
So the grown-ups begin to see their kids experiment with small amounts of pot and they begin to panic (after all, says the brainwashing propaganda, its 30 times more potent than when YOU experimented with it.(false) And this is where the cults can move in.  They feed on fear, which is endemic to the American belief system.  "Somebody is going to seduce my child into a life of drug-abusing  decadence and I do not have the confidence in my own upbringing to be able to handle this and have him come out of it alive."  The cults know your fears, and they will tell you after a brief "assessment" of your child that he's on a slippery slope, and if he's not treated by them, he's going to be dead within 3 years"
And it's all about money and politics ,too.  Do some more reading on these fora, and you will see a very interesting link between the money making schemes of private "treatment" facilities, mandatory drug testing (private organizations), drug warriors like Mel and Betty Sembler (Mel's a Bush appointee to the US ambassadorship in Italy, and DARE (widely criticised for it's ineffectiveness).
So, Boot camps, Adolescent Treatment, adult treatment AA, NA, Synanon, All of the 12 step programmes (note my English spelling)  are based  upon a fundamental flaw.
And I think that I feel very very sorry for the victims of these programmes because they have been deprived of so much of their potential for true joy, independance, freedom and experience.

And if you think that Fahrenheit 9/11 is a pack of lies, you might as well go on believing these cults, created by the hard religious right are a good thing. ( I cheered when I heard Ted Kennedy referring to that segment of the US population as religious zealots)
So that's my final word on this thread, I named myself after that great American Republican Hamilton Fish Jr from New York  who opposed the US getting into the war against Hitler. Perhaps because my belief system tells me that he was a perfect example of deluded thinking.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uote of the Year
The Bush administration has succeeded in making the United States one of the most feared and hated countries in the world. The talent of these guys is unbelievable. They have even succeeded at alienating Canada. I mean, that takes ge

Offline ottawa5

  • Posts: 144
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #21 on: July 15, 2004, 10:16:00 PM »
OK, here is the problem.  Whatever ideology a person chooses, whatever method you select, real life is going to be messy-- the translation of what you believe ideally, into real life, is much like the result that you get when you paint, or do scupture, or whatever---the actual result is going to deviate, in one way or another, for good or ill, from the original ideal. (Vladimir Lenin, who I suspect has some standing with you, encapsulated one aspect of this whole concept nicely in the idea that (and I paraphrase) "in order to make an omelette, you have to break some eggs".)

If you get too hung up on perfection, a course of action that is fail-safe perfect, you will be paralysed, and I might say, at the mercy of the arguments of  those who are not so ethically constrained.

So what is left to us?  To me, it's about standing up for my values which I have weighed and found to be central to the state of being fully human and living to one's full potential, a la Carl Rogers and Abraham(?) Maslowe ( specifically, values being that which we are willing to fight to defend).  It is also about cultivating necessary virtues, which are the qualities that help us defend the values that we have  decided are worth fighting for.

To me, as a mother, it is implicit, for example, that I will fight for my child.  And if I decide, after adequate research, that the best thing for that child is placing him or her in a setting (such as a CEDU school, where there is hope of removing influences that are alien to his or her happiness and/or success, so that the natural energy of growth can occur) then I will do it--- and all sorts of nay-sayers may come forward, or criticize me, or even demonize me to those who will listen--it will make no difference.  I am content in the knowledge that I have done what I need to do.

And happily, in practice, this approach seems to be paying off, in terms of my children's fulfillment.

But I must say that you have interesting ideas; if I am out west in Canada or you are down here, I would like to keep keep in contact--I think that disagreement, when it is done elegantly, is very growth promoting-- and you have shown that you are capable of such elegance, though I think often somewhat simplistic,---you of course know how to send me a message via this site, if you are in this geographical vicinity!





[ This Message was edited by: ottawa5 on 2004-07-31 07:41 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hamiltonf

  • Posts: 188
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #22 on: July 15, 2004, 11:20:00 PM »
Ok, you insist on throwing out little tid-bits that I cannot resist.   In my undergraduate Ed Psych classes my favourite theorist was Carl Rogers.  I have modelled much of my interviewing technique of clients even as a lawyer on his approach to counselling. It's very useful.  
WRT Abraham Maslow, his heirarchy of needs was all the rage in my first graduate degree, but I found his list sadly lacking in that it did not seem to address some people's drive for power -- and the powerlessness and alienation that I feel lies at the basis of today's materialistic malaise.  I actually gained most of my insights not from Lenin, but from the literature of the Lost Generation between the wars  T.S. Eliot, James Joyce, Ernest Hemingway, Morley Callaghan.  
And as for music, I learned a great deal about the great American Jazz Musicians by borrowing records from the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square, London during my teens.  
So I suspect your suggestion that my conclusions are somewhat simplistic is, in itself simplistic.  When I consider the lives of great artists like Charley Parker and Billie Holliday cut short in their prime and that the American Puritan Morality could not see beyond their drug use and reefer madness based as it was on racism to comprehend their physical and emotional pain, and that, had the US had policies such as Britain in those years they might have survived much longer.  Both were victims of the "cures" wrought by coerced treatment.
No, I will not compromize and admit to the simplistic construction you place on my "belief system".  My motivations are much more complex.

[ This Message was edited by: Hamiltonf on 2004-07-15 20:32 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uote of the Year
The Bush administration has succeeded in making the United States one of the most feared and hated countries in the world. The talent of these guys is unbelievable. They have even succeeded at alienating Canada. I mean, that takes ge

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #23 on: July 22, 2004, 11:50:00 AM »
Just realize the websites of the facility are grossly misleading.  They have PR companies working for them to attract clients.  

I don't know about AARC; I know it takes a long times sometimes to figure out the deleterious effect these places can have.  I could not discount the testimony at these sites. A lot of time people don't use identifiers because they are afraid to.  Sometimes parents are not the best source because they have been manipulated.  If their kid is scared "straight" (from coercion, verbal and mental abuse, the bullying that is rampant in some of these facilities), they might look fine when they first get out, but suffer PTSD, anxiety, and other problems later.  Also they will lose trust in you for putting them there to begin with.  Last, I will say that at many places, the staff tightly regulates your contact w/family, monitors your letters and phone calls, and tells the parents things that aren't entirely honest to keep your kid there. Who are you going to believe, your kid or a staff member?

Many of these facilities are on the ISACC watch list, so check there.

Find out where the staff is accredited. Many of them get accredited from bogus Internet "schools" and have no idea how to run a therapeutic program. Ask them exactly how they conduct their "therapy."

Question everything. It's your kid, afterall.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline ottawa5

  • Posts: 144
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #24 on: July 30, 2004, 10:56:00 PM »
To the Hamilton-Canadian poster:

I was truly quite interested in hearing from you over in the CEDU posts.  It is just that the day had been taxing---I don't really mind that you are sort of socialistic or drug-obsessed or America-bashing, there is a place for all those things.

But, for heaven's sake, you morph out into all these areas, you say things like "Bushist" and "cold war" and "Chomsky", and more, there is nothing wrong with broad interests, but what about the reality of one's own life, one's own family, one's own interests and, indeed, one's own loves?

This is where I am--looking for meaning within my own life--I am not saying you are wrong to go universal at the slightest opportunity, but, I wonder, does it not ever occur to you that the truth can be accessed more easily closer to home?

You must forgive me for being so philosophical, I am in the midst of reading "The Gnostic Jung and the Seven Sermons to the Dead" by S. A. Hoeller, and the personal is much more on my radar screen than the larger political, at the moment.

But even the ghost of Carl Jung was not enough to keep me from taking a time out and checking this site.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Hamiltonf

  • Posts: 188
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #25 on: July 31, 2004, 10:48:00 AM »
And as you confess, unable to see the bigger picture.
All this introspection is a retreat into superstition and religion in a world gone mad.
And all of the CEDU's and the WWASP's and the AARC's are a symptom of that madness.
Read Thomas Szasz
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uote of the Year
The Bush administration has succeeded in making the United States one of the most feared and hated countries in the world. The talent of these guys is unbelievable. They have even succeeded at alienating Canada. I mean, that takes ge

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
AARC
« Reply #26 on: July 31, 2004, 01:00:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-07-10 11:45:00, ottawa5 wrote:

"Normally I don't address anonymous postings (you can't always tell if it is a new person or one of the site "regulars" having a little fun with you)


Uh, Ottowa? This is one of the regulars having a little (sadistic) fun with you. She also posts as
Anonymous 32 posts
AARCgrad 1 posts
JessicaM 2 posts

Just thought you might like to know.

A little government and a little luck are necessary in life, but only a fool trust either of them
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0679737898/circlofmiamithem' target='_new'> P.J. O'Rourke

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline ottawa5

  • Posts: 144
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #27 on: July 31, 2004, 04:10:00 PM »
Not quite sure why you're telling me this and don't really have time to go back and look at the post at the moment. I glean from your kind of smug tone that there was something there that indicated the identity of this person, when I had thought she was Anonymous--this would not surprise me, computerized communication is not my favorite medium.  

Oh well, not everyone is good at everything, and I must go, I have to leave you a little gift at another Hot Topic before we take off for a little "vacance" some place nice and sunny and not hooked up to the Internet.

I'm sure you will be able to plod along without me until I get back, no??
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
AARC
« Reply #28 on: July 31, 2004, 07:39:00 PM »
You should go look. It's really funny! See, this person has been trolling the AARC forum for some time. But, it seems, because they put forth a positive take on the Program, not only to you buy it hook, line and sinker, but you even allude to the practice as regards anon posters who put forth views that you're not so willing to accept.

Boy! You're gonna be some great head shrinker, I'll tell you what!  :rofl:

The most important bill in our whole code is that for the diffusion of
knowledge among the people. No other sure foundation can be devised, for the preservation of freedom and happiness.

--Thomas Jefferson



_________________
Ginger Warbis ~ Antigen
Seed sibling `71 - `80
Straight South (Sarasota, FL)
   10/80 - 10/82
Anonymity Anonymous
It is wrong to leave a stumbling block in the road once it has tripped you.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
AARC
« Reply #29 on: August 03, 2004, 10:09:00 AM »
Antigen,

This is the user known sometimes as JessicaM.  I have never posted under the name ottawa (or whatever it is), and I don't like being catagorized with that person.  I have been posting here for a couple of years, at the beginning I was "cheeky54", then I was JessicaM, mostly just anonymous, because I always forget my sign in as I don't post often enough.

I'm not mad, I just wanted to clear that up.  And I am definitely not positive when it comes to AARC.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »