Author Topic: Did anyone catch this one?  (Read 1338 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline marika708

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch this one?
« on: June 22, 2004, 12:09:00 PM »
Monday, June 21, 2004
-------------------------------
LIFE WITH BIG BROTHER
Bush to screen population for mental illness
Sweeping initiative links diagnoses to treatment with specific drugs

Posted: June 21, 2004
5:00 p.m. Eastern




President Bush plans to unveil next month a sweeping mental health initiative that recommends screening for every citizen and promotes the use of expensive antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs favored by supporters of the administration.

The New Freedom Initiative, according to a progress report, seeks to integrate mentally ill patients fully into the community by providing "services in the community, rather than institutions," the British Medical Journal reported.


Critics say the plan protects the profits of drug companies at the expense of the public.

The initiative began with Bush's launch in April 2002 of the New Freedom Commission on Mental Health, which conducted a "comprehensive study of the United States mental health service delivery system."

The panel found that "despite their prevalence, mental disorders often go undiagnosed" and recommended comprehensive mental health screening for "consumers of all ages," including preschool children.

The commission said, "Each year, young children are expelled from preschools and childcare facilities for severely disruptive behaviors and emotional disorders."

Schools, the panel concluded, are in a "key position" to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at the schools.

The commission recommended that the screening be linked with "treatment and supports," including "state-of-the-art treatments" using "specific medications for specific conditions."

The Texas Medication Algorithm Project, or TMAP, was held up by the panel as a "model" medication treatment plan that "illustrates an evidence-based practice that results in better consumer outcomes."

The TMAP -- started in 1995 as an alliance of individuals from the pharmaceutical industry, the University of Texas and the mental health and corrections systems of Texas -- also was praised by the American Psychiatric Association, which called for increased funding to implement the overall plan.

But the Texas project sparked controversy when a Pennsylvania government employee revealed state officials with influence over the plan had received money and perks from drug companies who stand to gain from it.

Allen Jones, an employee of the Pennsylvania Office of the Inspector General says in his whistleblower report the "political/pharmaceutical alliance" that developed the Texas project, which promotes the use of newer, more expensive antidepressants and antipsychotic drugs, was behind the recommendations of the New Freedom Commission, which were "poised to consolidate the TMAP effort into a comprehensive national policy to treat mental illness with expensive, patented medications of questionable benefit and deadly side effects, and to force private insurers to pick up more of the tab."

Jones points out, according to the British Medical Journal, companies that helped start the Texas project are major contributors to Bush's election funds. Also, some members of the New Freedom Commission have served on advisory boards for these same companies, while others have direct ties to TMAP.

Eli Lilly, manufacturer of olanzapine, one of the drugs recommended in the plan, has multiple ties to the Bush administration, BMJ says. The elder President Bush was a member of Lilly's board of directors and President Bush appointed Lilly's chief executive officer, Sidney Taurel, to the Homeland Security Council.

Of Lilly's $1.6 million in political contributions in 2000, 82 percent went to Bush and the Republican Party.

Another critic, Robert Whitaker, journalist and author of "Mad in America," told the British Medical Journal that while increased screening "may seem defensible," it could also be seen as "fishing for customers."

Exorbitant spending on new drugs "robs from other forms of care such as job training and shelter program," he said.

However, a developer of the Texas project, Dr. Graham Emslie, defends screening.

"There are good data showing that if you identify kids at an earlier age who are aggressive, you can intervene ... and change their trajectory."



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If you'd like to sound off on this issue, please take part in the WorldNetDaily poll.




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Resentment is like taking poison and waiting for the other person to die
-- Malachy McCourt

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arika
Atlanta \'83-\'84

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Helena Handbasket

  • Posts: 1102
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch this one?
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2004, 09:54:00 PM »
Wow, Marika - thanks... for reminding me about WND!

I used to read World Net Daily back when I had the time... which was around two years ago, so no, I didn't see this.

How sick is this?

Can you see it now?  Screening booths set up at your local mall, staffed with "trained" screeners who probably never even enrolled in Psych 101, trying to interpret the DSM IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders).

Oh - well there ya go - if you grab a copy of the DSM IV (are we up to IV-R yet?), and flip to a random disorder - you will probably be able to identify yourself, if not someone you know - as HAVING that particular disorder!  

Boing!  Back to the "Program".

Go on - head to the library or your local bookstore and give it a try.  It may not work the first time, especially if you land on "Alzheimer's Disease" or most titles under "Fetishism" - stick to the "Personality Disorders" section.

No - I'm not dissing the the DSM IV. It is a valuable tool... in LEGITIMATE PRACTICE.
 :evil:








_________________
"If you always do what you've always done, you always get what you always got"[ This Message was edited by: Sara-1984 on 2004-06-22 18:58 ]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uly 21, 2003 - September 17, 2006

Offline Helena Handbasket

  • Posts: 1102
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch this one?
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2004, 10:12:00 PM »
Oh, and another thing....

Q.  What do you get when you put pseudo-trained laypeople in a position to diagnose and treat possible mental and/or addiction disorders (real or imagined)?


A.  Bethel, CEDU, Daytop, ELAN, LIFE, Straight,  WWASPs, and other brainwashing institutions*


* In alphabetical order and many not included.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
uly 21, 2003 - September 17, 2006

Offline marika708

  • Posts: 55
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch this one?
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2004, 11:43:00 AM »
Schools, the panel concluded, are in a "key position" to screen the 52 million students and 6 million adults who work at the schools.


This really gets me, as soon as it becomes a "requirement" for admission, then here we go.  Another way for these idiots to get something mandated and make a profit from it.  Can anyone say "chickenpox vaccine"?  

Let's scare the shit out of the general population, then provide them with the ONLY ANSWER that we just happen to make a profit from...

How can we as a country be so blind?

Marika

Since you [US "drug tsar" McCaffrey] control a federal budget that has just been increased from $17.8 billion last year to $19.2 billion this year, is asking people like you if we should continue with our nation's current drug policy like a person asking a barber if one needs a haircut? --
                                                              Orange Country, California
                                                                  Los Angeles Times
                                                                    29 March 2000
--Judge James P. Gray

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
arika
Atlanta \'83-\'84

Offline Scarstruck

  • Posts: 600
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did anyone catch this one?
« Reply #5 on: June 24, 2004, 07:58:00 AM »
Fuck the world  ::armed::  ::armed::
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
b] KATHY DAVID IS A CHILD MOLESTOR[/b]
\"You knew I was a snake when you picked me up\" ~S.S