I was actually expecting a little more from you. The one consistent motif throughout the industry is that young people should take accountability for their actions, and accept responsibility for the results that those actions bring.
Leaving aside the hypocrisy, and lack of role modeling on this issue, here's the danger in not publicly addressing the issue. While there are programs that have evolved, there are programs that most certainly have not. As I recall as recently as 2011 there was a Washington state based psychologist defending MBA's use of pulling tree trunks - he was defending a practice that the State of Oregon found to be abusive. Without a public discussion of what in 2013 is antiquated treatment, practicioners will continue use outdated methods. And I don't expect that the free market will be very effective in weeding those people out in a timely manner, for that very same reason that the profession hasn't declared it to be an antiquated technology.
It's not that I would expect the industry to flaggelate itself over its past abuses, it's that I would expect in light of everything that's happened over the last seven years, that there would be more of a paper trail of people who work in the parent choice industry talking about how the industry evolved, and exactly why it needed to evolve. Particularly, if we are to believe that the those who are now in their late 20's and 30's who talk about how they were abused as youth isn't indicative of where the field is today.
If you can point me to articles where this kind of critical analysis has occurred, it would be much appreciated.