« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: WWASPS v. PURE  (Read 1541 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« on: February 03, 2004, 08:43:00 PM »
Folks, good news!  The PACER system now offers instant registration.  If you are interested in following this case, click on the link below. Once you are registered, the court records can be found by clicking on DISTRICT and then UTAH.  Enter the party name (e.g. PURE or World Wide Association).

http://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/

Anybody interested in legal issues as they relate to the teen help industry, in general, should find this resource (PACER) quite useful.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2004, 09:03:00 PM »
Quote
1/28/04  133     Memorandum by World Wide Assn Spec  in support of [132-1]
                 motion for sanctions and fees against dft Sue Scheff for
                 failure to appear for scheduled deposition in Florida,
                 [132-2] motion for order to take deposition of Sue Scheff
                 in Salt Lake City (tsh) [Entry date 01/30/04]



This was on Pacer.  Does this mean Sue failed to appear in court or at a deposition?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2004, 09:13:00 PM »
Here are some of the schools PURE refers to.  This was on Pacer.

Quote
11/14/03 101     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Sue
                 Embry, Oak Ridge Military Academy executed on 10/21/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/18/03]

11/14/03 102     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Chad
                 Sorenson, High Top Academy executed on 10/28/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/18/03]

11/14/03 103     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Melanie
                 Habibian, Red Rock Canyon School, executed on 10/30/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/18/03]

11/14/03 104     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Paul
                 Simkins, Sorenson's Ranch School, executed on 10/31/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/18/03]

11/14/03 105     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Elaine
                 Lott, Lott's Legacy Boarding School, executed on 11/03/03.
                 (tsh) [Entry date 11/18/03]



Docket as of January 30, 2004 10:07 pm               Page 14  

Proceedings include all events.                                   JURY
2:02cv10 World Wide Assn Spec v. Pure, et al

11/19/03 106     Withdrawal of [95-1] motion to amend [21-1] amended
                 complaint (for leave to file second amd cmp) (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/21/03]

11/21/03 107     Certificate of service by World Wide Assn Spec re: Pla's
                 Third Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of
                 Docs to Dft Pure (tsh) [Entry date 11/25/03]

11/24/03 108     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Grant
                 Pemberton, Red Fern Ranch executed on 11/12/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/26/03]

11/24/03 109     Return of service executed re: subpoena issued to Mark V.
                 Sudweeks, The Whitmore Academy executed on 11/15/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 11/26/03]

12/1/03  110     Memorandum by Sue Scheff, Pure Fdn, Pure  in opposition to
                 [100-1] motion to compel dfts Sue Scheff and Jeff Berryman
                 to produce concealed email correspondence, [100-2] motion
                 for sanctions against dfts Sue Scheff and Jeff Berryman for
                 the concealment of email correspondence (tsh)
                 [Entry date 12/03/03]

12/2/03  111     Return of service executed re: subpoena as to Larry Bauer -
                 Glacier Mountain executed on 11/24/03. (tsh)
                 [Entry date 12/03/03] [Edit date 12/03/03]

12/3/03  112     Stipulation by Sue Scheff, Pure Fdn, Pure, World Wide Assn
                 Spec, and Red Rock Canyon School stip for entry of
                 protective order re: confidential docs and information (tsh)
                 [Entry date 12/08/03]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2004, 06:05:00 PM »
:eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:  :eek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2004, 08:51:00 PM »
Quote
 Does this mean Sue failed to appear in court or at a deposition?



Actually, this means you're a "busy body"!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2004, 08:57:00 PM »
This case is like the energizer bunny ...

 :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2004, 09:05:00 PM »
Quote
Actually, this means you're a "busy body"!


Ouch again!  I guess if that is all you can say, well then, I can take it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #7 on: February 04, 2004, 09:25:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-02-04 17:51:00, Anonymous wrote:

"
Quote

  Does this mean Sue failed to appear in court or at a deposition?






Actually, this means you're a "busy body"!"


Lawsuits are News.

I've noticed the teen "help" industry is very thin skinned and prone to thinking what it does is just its own very private business.

Nothing could be further from the truth.  When you offer behavior mod treatment to the public, particularly inpatient behavior mod, *everything* you do except for issues of patient confidentiality is the public's business.

Mental, behavioral, and other medical treatments quit being the strictly private business of providers about the time that society realized Patent Medicines and people practicing medicine without a license were problems---if not then, then *at least* by the time Nellie Bly blew the lid off patient mistreatment in insane asylums.

It is very much the business of every single voter in this country what you guys do to teens in those facilities----whether they're being provided with quality care, or not.

This lawsuit is part of the pattern of unfolding scandals surrounding these facilities, and voters who pay attention to it to inform themselves and keep up with this important public health issue are just being good citizens.

Carey may not be a perfect paragon of virtue, but in sharing this information on Fornits she's just being a responsible voter.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #8 on: February 04, 2004, 10:01:00 PM »
Thanks Anon, that was a very good post, and yes, I agree that the public has a right and a need to know what's going on in these places, assuming the court record remains unsealed, which at the moment, appears to be at issue.

 :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline outmama

  • Posts: 2
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2004, 12:32:00 PM »
what is this all about?  it seems like you all understand allof this, but I don't.  Why all the sepoenas?  who is trying to do what to whom?  Or who said they did it?  Please.. in a nutshell can you fill me in?

Thank you
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASPS v. PURE
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2004, 12:39:00 PM »
I'm sure the good people of WWASP would be glad to answer that..  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »