Author Topic: Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t  (Read 870 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t
« on: October 31, 2004, 12:27:00 PM »
http://thestraights.com/legal/bradbury- ... letter.htm

Perhaps it's time for Lenny to come to Jesus with his clients:
Have Mel and Betty Sembler misrepresented themselves to the court?

OK. This is a big break in the PumpGate story.

Ray Bradbury and team have been chomping at the bit for over a year to get to ask Mel and Betty Sembler some very pointed questions about their involvement in Straight, Inc. and Straight's involvement in widespread criminal child abuse. But it doesn't look like the Ambassador has been around too much to answer those embarrassing questions due to his heavy load administering to the affairs of the United States government in Rome. So Judge Anthony Rondolino finally said hey I want you guys to go to a mediator. He didn't say they have to come to an agreement; just that he hoped an unbiased, third part could help Bradbury and the Semblers come to some sort of an agreement or settlement. Only, Judge Rondolino didn't say it would be nice for them to mediate--he ordered them to mediate. And he told them to do it by August 27. That's when Ana-Maria Carnesoltas, Esq. of Englander & Fisher (Ambassador Sembler's lawyers) told the court that Ambassador Sembler could not mediate any time soon because:

1. mediation would not be meaningful until the discovery process has been completed and,because of "counsel scheduling conflicts" [those are Ms. Carnesoltas words], after one year Lenny was not scheduled to depose Ray Bradbury until sometime after August 27, 2004! Lenny Englander has canceled Ray Bradbury's deposition four times already. To us it sounds like he doesn't want to depose Ray Bradbury because when he does it's time for Bradbury to depose Mel and Betty.
2. the Ambassador's job was so demanding in Italy he just can't pull away from it any time soon.  

Enclosure 1 is Ana-Maria Carnesoltas, Esq.'s response to the judge's order where she says the Sembler's are not expected in country for "the next several months." And that's where the problem starts for the Semblers because several people have now submitted sworn affidavits to the court attesting that they have knowledge that both Melvin and Betty Sembler have been in the United States in the period their attorney says they "are not expected to be."

So Tom McGowan, Mr. Bradbury 's attorney, sent the Ambassador the letter at enclosure 2, 3 and 4 asking him point blank, "were you in the Untied States when you told the court you were not expected to be in the United States and therefore could not attend to court ordered mediation?" He sent Betty Sembler a similar letter at enclosure 5 and 6. Astonishingly, Ambassador Sembler and Betty have just admitted that they were in fact in country during the period in question. See their admissions in enclosures 7.

Once the smoke clears who will be left to face the judge? Mel and Betty haven't signed anything. Lenny stopped signing documents regarding Pumpgate months ago.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2004, 09:22:00 AM »
Failing to look at the rigged papers WEs has carefully 'scanned' for us to look at, you don't see that all of this is probably propaganda and bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.

I can do a much better job than Wes did of deleting names and editing dates.  My photoshop is brand spanking new and so are my Macromedia site progs.  But I simply wouldn't waste my time on a cause that's as futile and odd as this one.  But Wes and some others seem to think that noone here has seen through them already, so they just keep faking papers and lieing about court dates and fucking up nothing.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline kpickle39

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 481
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2004, 12:35:00 PM »
You are so correct about the "scan" job.  I bet that is all the court will look at as well.  You  see, state law hangs on penmanship and high quality "scanning" jobs.  This trumps any of the facts that Mel and Betty are about to lose this  case.   I'm sure you are a student of Englander's as his defense of this entire law suit is about as appropriate as your concern of Wes's scanning.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t
« Reply #3 on: November 07, 2004, 07:24:00 AM »
hahahahaha -  you were so fucking wrong Sembler troll.  The papers you refer to are just the beginning.  See you in 2 weeks.  LOLOLOL :rofl:  :rofl:  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Antigen

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 12992
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://wwf.Fornits.com/
Did Ambassador and Mrs. Sembler misrepresent themselves to t
« Reply #4 on: November 07, 2004, 01:53:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-11-02 06:22:00, Anonymous wrote:

But I simply wouldn't waste my time on a cause that's as futile and odd as this one.


Yeah, I've thought the same thing. Makes ya' wonder why the Semblers and E&F initiated this case to begin with, doesn't it?

If there is a God, he is a malign thug.
--Samuel Clemens "Mark Twain", American author and humorist

« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
"Don\'t let the past remind us of what we are not now."
~ Crosby Stills Nash & Young, Sweet Judy Blue Eyes