Author Topic: Do not use WWASP  (Read 6723 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #30 on: January 17, 2004, 10:47:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-01-17 12:53:00, Deborah wrote:

"***Isn't materbating considered an egregious offense in some of these places? How can parents be so anti-normal?***



This brings up some questions:

What's the arguement against masterbation? Religious?

Does the contract or parent manual inform parents that their teen will not be allowed to masterbate? Or is this sprung on the parent after they have signed the dotted line and find out their teen is being/has been punished for it?

Are they told how their teen will be punished if caught violating this rule?

How is the teen caught?

Are there hidden cameras, sheet/underwear/"spot" checks every morning, do they rely on other teens to rat out their peers?

Who's "truth" about masterbation is forced on the teen? And what rationale is given for forbidding it? "


Deborah - please visualize all the kids masturbating any time they feel like it.  Are you there yet?  Good...any more questions?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #31 on: January 17, 2004, 10:51:00 PM »
One thing I learned from my teen was that the word "normal" is misused and that teens stop listening when it is weilded. So, I took up the words constructive and destructive, which were more accurate. Was this kid's action constructive or destructive to himself? Was it normal?

Look at the origins of NORMAL. Mr. Webster defines it:
2 a : according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm*, rule, or principle
3 : occurring naturally
4 a : of, relating to, or characterized by average intelligence or development
b : free from mental disorder : SANE **

*NORM: an authoritative standard; a principle of right action binding upon the members of a group and serving to guide, control, or regulate proper and acceptable behavior

**SANE: 1 : proceeding from a sound mind : RATIONAL ***
2 : mentally sound; especially : able to anticipate and appraise the effect of one's actions

***RATIONAL: 1 a : having reason or understanding b : relating to, based on, or agreeable to reason : REASONABLE ****

****REASON: 2 a (1) : the power of comprehending, inferring, or thinking especially in orderly rational ways : INTELLIGENCE *****(2) : proper exercise of the mind

*****INTELLEGENCE: 1 a (1) : the ability to learn or understand or to deal with new or trying situations

The kid?s behavior does go against the commonly held societal norm. Is he insane? No.  Was he acting rationally/reasonably? I don?t know that he consciously rationalized his actions, but I think the answer is, Yes.

This culture is so uptight around nudity, sex, and sexuality in general. It?s common for people to have a hard time even saying the word, and when pushed to refer to the act of sex, they prefer to say ?made love? or ?went to bed with?. Anything but ?had sex?.

The taboo is so insidious that by the time kids reach their teen years they are dying of curiosity- just when hormones are raging. Don't even know how they were conceived. Where do they go to satisfy that rational curiosity? Nude bodies are easily found on the internet. It is very possible that there would be little interest if the teen was exposed to the nude body throughout childhood. Takes the mystery/ curiosity factor out of the equation.

Societal norms attempt to control and regulate sexual behavior, and based on what body of information? Religion attempts to define what is moral behavior and psychiatry attempts to define sane behavior? the majority hide their curiosity/ behavior because they don?t want to be labeled crazy or go against their religious conditioning. Psych professionals (probably in cahoots with religion)put forth the notion as truth, that masturbation was a ?disorder?. Of course, they eventually had to retract the lie, but not until it had wormed it?s way into the majority of minds; some still believe it.

As a product of a sexually suppressed culture, I think his behavior was normal and common. It is reasonable and rational to satisfy one?s curiosity. He didn?t violate anyone to do so. The women obviously offered their nude bodies for anyone to view. The argument could be put forth that porn queens exist largely to balance the scales of extreme suppression of ?naturally occurring? (normal) desire and curiosity. I?m personally more concerned with the sexually suppressed individual who violates an unwilling person to satisfy a natural need that has been skewed out of perspective.

Given the rigid, controlled environment he has and is currently living in, I think he exhibited intelligence- how to satisfy a rational curiosity-given the unreasonable limitations placed on him by parents, society, and BM facility.

I?m still trying to accept the fact that the American people- considered the most freedom loving people on the planet (LOL)- allowed an uptight, suppressed, government official to cover a nude statue in a PUBLIC institution. His behavior was insane (according to Webster) and a blatant slap in the face to the separation of church and state.

As to the petty theft issue. Any parent who knows their kid is prone to taking money, and continues to make it available, is considered insane by the program mantra, ?doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result= insanity??  

I?ve followed this parent?s drama and consider her the stereotypical program parent, THE poster parent for the THI. The type of parent all programs thrive on.

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #32 on: January 17, 2004, 11:19:00 PM »
Hey anon,
Do you believe that "Everything you think is real, isn't... and everything you think isn't real, is."

It is absolutely possible to consider one's self to be happy and satisfied, even when under the influence of someone else or someone else's thinking; who may or may not have your best interest at heart. On some level it doesn't matter if you are or just imagine it... pretty much the same. If you're happy, I'm happy for you !!

You obviously participated in the "Serious Debate" thread. You didn't step up and admit that the seminars were based on est/LS. In fact, the opportunity to discuss it was ignored, except for one parent who denied knowing anything about it.
Why the secrecy or avoidance?

Since you continue to defend it; Have you ever taken an est/LS course? Can you describe how it is similar and how it is different?  Do you believe that browbeating and confrontation and defering to the leader is necessary for change? Can you fathom there is a might be a more humane way?

What you continue to ignore is that my argument has to do with parents being informed of the content and methods used before being asked for a committment. If I'm going to participate in a personal growth seminar I want to know which philosophy it is based on AND have the time to research it AND the option to decline if I so choose. Anything short of that is deception and coercion, especially if contact with my child is dependent on participation.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #33 on: January 17, 2004, 11:43:00 PM »
***Deborah - please visualize all the kids masturbating any time they feel like it. Are you there yet? Good...any more questions? ***

Your direction was reasonable so I took it. I imagined a circle jerk (isn't that what teens call it?) and had a chuckle.

Then the reality of where they are sat in, and I visualized "normal" teens hiding under covers to explore their "normal" urges. That was a sad image.

What did you visualize? How might that be a problem for the program? So they do forbid this?
I've heard that it distracts them from "working their program". Can you confirm that? I'm more inclined to believe that it is forbidden to enhance the control techniques. What is the consequence? And how is it determined that one has participated in the forbidden activity?

You might consult with Felix and Carmela- the new resident, open-minded, alternative health professionals. They do not support sexual repression. Check out their Emerald Dragon drink.

http://www.lacocinita.com/story.php3?serial_no=127
Emerald Dragon
Our most popular ìsmart drink,î the Emerald Dragon is uniquely delectable, very energizing and we think it ís a great aphrodisiac! The active ingredients matcha (Japanese ceremonial green tea powder), wild oats and damiana are synergistically energizing and tonifying on deep as well as more superficial levels.

Serves 1
2 cups ice
1 cup fat-free vanilla rice milk
1 teaspoon premium organic matcha
1 dropper wild oats tincture
1 dropper damiana tincture
1 tablespoon raw honey
1 pinch nutmeg
1 pinch cayenne
1) Fill blender with ice, rice milk, matcha, damiana, wild oats, cayenne, nutmeg and honey, and blend until smooth.
2) Pour into a tall 16-ounce glass and garnish with a paper umbrella.
************

I would like to hear their, or any of these other "personal growth" experts, opinion on the matter. I lived in an alternative mecca for 20 years. If it's out there I've come in contact with it. And I know for certain that "alternative" people do not support sexual suppression. How DID these folks come to be associated with a teen warehouse facility? The best hope is that they will bring some rational, mind expansion to this issue.

If masturbation was allowed, there may be less anger and frustration- unless the goal is to keep the kids in an angry, frustrated, unsatisfied, uneducated, state of being.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #34 on: January 18, 2004, 01:24:00 PM »
I could have a good laugh on the visualization myself.  Thing is, isn't masturbation a private thing?  Under the sheets, in the bathroom, etc.?  To my knowledge this isn't an infraction.  Maybe it is if a kid is going to the bathroom every hour unless they are truly full of "piss" it would be getting in the way of class work or other activities.

No one watches them go to the bathroom or take a shower.  Don't know about other programs, but wwasps doesn't do the point reduction for this unless (possibly), like I said, it is seriously getting in the way of other activities.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #35 on: January 18, 2004, 01:29:00 PM »
Deborah you asked about hte seminars.  i agree that some of the contents are similar to est/lifespring seminars.  I disagree they are the same from what I've read about them.

There was no brow beating.  There were questions to get us to think about what isn't working in our lives.  Our answers were not orchestrated by the facilitator. No one told us what we were supposed to think or feel or believe.  Maybe that's the big difference.

Questions to gain clarity are good.  Some of the things I never thought about before.  Life outside the box has it's rewards.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #36 on: January 18, 2004, 01:36:00 PM »
PS - I don't agree with knowing the contents prior to a seminar.  If we don't like it, we can leave, though in all the seminars I've participated in and staffed, only two left, and one came back after a break, by her own choice, not coerced.  

If you are familiar with alternative medicine, then it would seem you would appreciate alternatives to therapy, drugs for depression, ADD and other things that can be changed by changing life's stress levels or becoming conscious of behaviors.

I don't think there's anything I will say that will convince you that it works, if the person chooses to do the inner work.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #37 on: January 18, 2004, 01:50:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-01-18 10:36:00, Anonymous wrote:

"PS - I don't agree with knowing the contents prior to a seminar.  If we don't like it, we can leave, though in all the seminars I've participated in and staffed, only two left, and one came back after a break, by her own choice, not coerced.  



If you are familiar with alternative medicine, then it would seem you would appreciate alternatives to therapy, drugs for depression, ADD and other things that can be changed by changing life's stress levels or becoming conscious of behaviors.



I don't think there's anything I will say that will convince you that it works, if the person chooses to do the inner work."


Cult smoke and mirrors.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #38 on: January 18, 2004, 03:08:00 PM »
Back at you : FEAR smoke and mirrors :grin:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #39 on: January 18, 2004, 03:32:00 PM »
***To my knowledge this [masturbation] isn't an infraction.***
To your knowledge? So, you don?t know?

***No one watches them go to the bathroom or take a shower. Don't know about other programs, but wwasps doesn't do the point reduction for this unless (possibly), like I said, it is seriously getting in the way of other activities.***
But, now you know. Sounds more like assumptions.

*** i agree that some of the contents are similar to est/lifespring seminars. I disagree they are the same from what I've read about them.***
So, you too draw conclusions and form opinions based on information you read? Ironic !

***There was no brow beating.***
Your perception, which is contrary to others.

***No one told us what we were supposed to think or feel or believe. Maybe that's the big difference.***
So, I?ll ask again. Do you believe that "Everything you think is real, isn't... and everything you think isn't real, is."  

*** I don't agree with knowing the contents prior to a seminar. If we don't like it, we can leave, though in all the seminars I've participated in and staffed, only two left, and one came back after a break, by her own choice, not coerced.***
Again, this is contrary to others experiences. I said, know the ?philosophy?, although the basic content should be disclosed as well.  It is easy to understand how parents feel deceived and coerced when they find themselves in a seminar without prior knowledge of what, or whose theory they are going to be subjected to, and contact with their child is dependent on their participation. Might have fewer ?disgruntled? parents if this was disclosed before they made a financial commitment to the program. And none of you ever answered the question that was posed regarding the animosity/disdain/judgment held toward these parents, especially the ones who ?rescue their little darlings?.  

***If you are familiar with alternative medicine, then it would seem you would appreciate alternatives to therapy, drugs for depression, ADD and other things that can be changed by changing life's stress levels or becoming conscious of behaviors.***
Not the argument. The argument is incarceration, labeling one family member (the teen) as the source of the family?s problem. Rigid rules and questionable BM techniques. Using contact with parents as punishment (or motivation), etc, etc, etc. The alternatives I?m familiar with do not include such austere rigidity, disrespect, and abuse as a means to an end.

***I don't think there's anything I will say that will convince you that it works, if the person chooses to do the inner work.***
I am convinced that you feel happy and satisfied, that you genuinely believe it works. Based on your comments, it is my belief that you still have some more work to do in the direction of understanding what constitutes genuine respect for others, particularly teens, and unsuspecting parents. It is quiet possible that everything you currently believe to be truth, isn?t?. and everything you believe isn?t truth, is?.  Time will tell. For the moment, enjoy your happiness and satisfaction. If nothing else, it?s a reprieve, before the next level of awareness hits like a bolt of lightening.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #40 on: January 18, 2004, 04:06:00 PM »
To masterbate, or not to masterbate. Hmmm, too bad these parents didn't just do the M thing instead of the F thing b/c there would be a lot less kids being raised in some institutionalized style program instead of at home, where they belong.

SHAMEFUL PARENTS!!!!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #41 on: February 19, 2004, 11:07:00 PM »
ATTN: This is not SPAM.  :cool:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #42 on: February 22, 2004, 07:53:00 PM »
the week i ook my son out of the program, on my weekly call to the rep, i asked what my son had dont "this week" that prevented him from speaking to me.  the family rep herself (heidi mcginnis) told me my son was consequenced for masturbating.  I thought that weird, to say the least.  thats weird, and masturbation is normal i had to put my self in the other persons shoes for a minute and wonder how i'd feel and concluded that must not be any privacy for someone to "catch" you masturbating, and how awful to be consequenced for addressing your natural biological urges.  And if a person was there for a year, heavan's sake, how long can a normal, healthy person, teen or adult, cope
I never asked my son about this (god! how embarassing would that be, for you mom to ask the circumstances of you getting caught masterburating!)  but i wondered about this for some time.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #43 on: February 22, 2004, 07:57:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-01-18 10:24:00, Anonymous wrote:

"I could have a good laugh on the visualization myself.  Thing is, isn't masturbation a private thing?  Under the sheets, in the bathroom, etc.?  To my knowledge this isn't an infraction.  Maybe it is if a kid is going to the bathroom every hour unless they are truly full of "piss" it would be getting in the way of class work or other activities.



No one watches them go to the bathroom or take a shower.  Don't know about other programs, but wwasps doesn't do the point reduction for this unless (possibly), like I said, it is seriously getting in the way of other activities.  



 



"

no one watches them go to the bathroom or take a shower?  isn't the drill to wait outside of stall while someone goes to the bathroom?  
Which wasp program do you speak of?
or do you mean, no one watches upper levels take a shower or go to the bathroom.  

you mean they LET kids go to the bathroom every hour?  which wasp program?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
Do not use WWASP
« Reply #44 on: February 22, 2004, 08:06:00 PM »
Quote
On 2004-01-17 12:53:00, Deborah wrote:

"***Isn't materbating considered an egregious offense in some of these places? How can parents be so anti-normal?***



This brings up some questions:

What's the arguement against masterbation? Religious?

Does the contract or parent manual inform parents that their teen will not be allowed to masterbate? Or is this sprung on the parent after they have signed the dotted line and find out their teen is being/has been punished for it?

Are they told how their teen will be punished if caught violating this rule?

How is the teen caught?

Are there hidden cameras, sheet/underwear/"spot" checks every morning, do they rely on other teens to rat out their peers?

Who's "truth" about masterbation is forced on the teen? And what rationale is given for forbidding it? "


Deborah, i'm going to check the manual on that one.  spot checks every morning!  thats funny.
I'd ask my son that, b/c he was consequenced for that, but you know, he'd be absolutely mortified, so i will spare him.  Tell us waspers, what say you about that?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »