Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry

Lee & Spots, How did you have information on my depostion?

<< < (3/6) > >>

Carey:
Wrong.  Where you got your information from is very relevent.  You just don't get how relevent.  It shows how the "group" works.  Sue can't speak publically so she uses you guys to do her dirty work.

Anonymous:
Good God, Lee and Spots.  Take a break.  Read a book (or the volumes of legal documents pertaining to PURE). Have a beer, or any other kind of cold beverage, just as long as you chill out for awhile. You are boring me to tears.

 :cry2:

Antigen:

--- Quote ---On 2004-01-02 14:06:00, turbinekat wrote:

 You have no facts to back up any of your allegations you continue to accuse me of.

--- End quote ---


Except, of course, that both of you are listes on PURE's website as volunteers, you have acknowledged that you know about it and, by inaction, if not just evasion, you apparently think that that's perfectly approriate.

But I'm still puzzling over this one. Why do you so often refer to people noticing this as an accusation? Is there something bad about being affiliated w/ PURE?

All our liberties are due to men who, when their conscience has compelled them, have broken the laws of the land.
--William Kingdon Clifford
--- End quote ---

Antigen:
Unless you think Carey posesses the mighty awsome power to warp time and cause packages to arrive through couriors in a matter of time that defies the laws of physics, I think the gal has made a pretty good argument to support her conclusion.

Why change the subject now?

Ya' know, we can always go on Ricki Lake.
 :rofl:

--- Quote ---On 2004-01-02 15:16:00, Anonymous wrote:

"We must be tawkin about the 12.5 you took in exchange for the Trekker's collective heads on a platter to wwasp.

So it's gossip; or was until you confirmed it and began to try and defend it.

If anything you did or said that has been reported is incorrect, you can prove it when you post your deposition; in it's entirety.

We await your vindication. . ."

--- End quote ---

I have never killed a man, but I have read many obituaries with great pleasure.

--Clarence Darrow
--- End quote ---

Antigen:

--- Quote ---On 2004-01-02 17:27:00, spots wrote:

"On January 1, 2004, at 6:36am, Carey Bock said:
 I am under no obligation to say where I got my information [it was not from Sue Scheff, nor PURE, nor from a Trekker group, as Ginger has verified with her greater wisdom of which ISP's send info, etc.].
--- End quote ---


Spots, believe me when I tell you I like you and respect you. You have touched my heart when you've spoken from yours about your grand-daughter. I don't know what you look like, but I seriously think of you as being very much like my kind, gentle, apparently psychic and, thanfully, benevolent grandmother. She passed on when I was very small, but I remember what it was like to have one.

But you're missing something here. Of course I'm not about to try and coerce you to answer the question. That's not my place. It really isn't! I didn't really think up my terms of use as I have them written. When I decided to open these forums, I refreshed my memory on accepted policy for unmoderated, unedited, interactive discussion. That's about the state of it.

That doesn't mean there are no other rules. There are many, subtle rules of discussion that overlap on eachother. There's just no authority, other than your own sense of reason, to enforce them.

If you are going to post as fact what you've heard about Carey's deposition, why you should not be the least bit put off if she does the same with Sues. It doesn't matter what I think. I don't play that role. But you have to admit, the gal has a point. Why is it OK for someone who has access to information about Carey's deposition that only Sue, PURE lawyers, WWASP lawyers and Carey witnessed, then why is it a different case when Carey does just exactly the same thing.

Wait! Not exactly the same thing. Carey quoted the x-script. What do you have to support your claims? And, since I'm actually mentioned, would you mind sending me a copy?

BTW, based on what I've actually seen and what I have not, I'm not at all sure that this alleged suit has been or will be filed. Not saying it hasn't or won't. Just that I'll believe it when I see it. Just like Huron.


What is this new loyalty? It is, above all, conformity. It is the uncritical and unquestioning acceptance of America as it is. It rejects inquiry into the race question or socialized medicine or public housing, regards as heinous any challenge to what is called the system of private enterprise, identifying that system with Americanism. It abandons evolution, repudiates the once popular concept of progress, and regards America as a finished product, perfect and complete. The concept of loyalty as conformity is a false one. It is narrow and restrictive, denies freedom of thought and conscience... What do men know of loyalty who make a mockery of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights?
Anonymity Anonymous

[ This Message was edited by: Antigen on 2004-01-02 21:21 ]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page