Announcements & Tech Support > Web forum hosting
Ginger, You're Only Hurting Yourself!
Antigen:
Yeah, what do you suppose that guy was thinking? And what about Karen. She posts here pseudo-anonymously quite often and has not been shy about claiming her unwavering support for Rogers.
What have you got to say now, Karen? Is this guy a crack-pot or what?
Oh yeah, I must be talking to myself since I'm the only one who can post anonymously, huh?
Do you get it yet? The dude is acting radically based on his belief in totally unfounded assumptions. And your kid is apparently drawn in, hook, line and sinker. Does this worry you at all?
I think animal testing is a terrible idea; they get all nervous and give the wrong answers.
-- A Bit of Fry and Laurie
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
This must be the Christian right's idea of faith based smart bombs - verbal crap in the name of Jesus and Brainwashing in the name of Jesus.
Ginger is your intellectual superior - admit it.
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-03-30 20:31:00, CraigRogers wrote:
"Now... now... dont get your dress in a huff. Relax and allow me to spend my money the way I want. If I want to hire an attorney and hold you and Fornit's responsible for your violation of the law please allow me to do it. For someone who advocates personal freedom you sure spend a great deal of energy trying to control me. Dont waste your time, I already have a mom. And, you seem to be old enough to be my grandmother. I have a couple of those too! "
--- End quote ---
Craig, just sue her. By the way, you horribly insulted your poor grandmother -- she has to look a whole bunch better than Ginger. I've seen a picture and Ginger looks like she belongs in "Jim Rockford's" trailer. In other words, Ginger is "trailer-trash".
Fornits falsely represents itself as help to survivors and parents. It's actually a device by which Ginger, who is actually a VICTIM much more than she is a survivor, abuses survivors.
I hear that Sue Scheff is close to getting her judgment anyway, and that, combined with your proposed action, and the other lawsuits in which Ginger will no doubt be named as a defendant should end Ginger's abuse of program survivors.
Antigen:
Believe nothing you hear and only half what you see.
BTW, how's Texas, Lee? :wave:
As your attorney, it is my duty to inform you that it is not important that you understand what I'm doing or why you're paying me so much money. What's important is that you continue to do so.
--Hunter S. Thompson's Samoan Attorney
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-04-02 13:10:00, Anonymous wrote:
"
Fornits falsely represents itself as help to survivors and parents. It's actually a device by which Ginger, who is actually a VICTIM much more than she is a survivor, abuses survivors.
--- End quote ---
Since Ginger is a victim and not a survivor, she must be dead! Id she is dead, the you are merely typing into the air, and conferring with your self.
--- Quote ---
I hear that Sue Scheff is close to getting her judgment anyway, and that, combined with your proposed action, and the other lawsuits in which Ginger will no doubt be named as a defendant should end Ginger's abuse of program survivors."
--- End quote ---
From you statement above, I can only assume that you are classifying survivors as those who have run these programs, and those who were in them, victims.
So in short, you post reads that Craig should sue Ginger, who as being victim and non survivor (must be dead), is harassing those who have survived the travesty of abusing children.
Ya, you got some good intel ::puke::
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version