Author Topic: In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney  (Read 2756 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Reddit TroubledTeens

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 312
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.reddit.com/r/troubledteens
In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney
« on: July 19, 2012, 03:32:24 PM »
*Edit: please help to spread this article! Tips on places to post, hashtags, blog ideas, etc. are here: http://troubledteenindustry.com/profile ... structions


http://www.salon.com/2012/07/18/dark_si ... n_success/

Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 07:45 AM EDT
Dark side of a Bain success
A for-profit health company bought by Bain -- that Romney profits from -- has exploded in size and tales of neglect
By Art Levine

Topics: Bain Capital, CRC, Election 2012, Mitt Romney
Dark side of a Bain successClockwise from top left: Brendan Blum, Sergey Blashchishen, Matthew Meyer and Lindsey Poteet. Aspen Education already faced a wrongful death lawsuit over Meyer when Bain and CRC Health Group bought the company in 2006. Six deaths since the takeover, including Blum, Blashchishen and Poteet, have generated either lawsuits or complaints of neglect.

It seemed a world away from the executive suites of Bain Capital when Dana Blum, a recent widow living in Portland, Ore., made the fateful decision to send her son Brendan to Youth Care, a residential program for troubled teens located in the suburbs of Salt Lake City.

Brendan, a 14-year-old boy with Asperger’s syndrome, had been extremely aggressive for years; he was even arrested a few times after attacking members of his family. Local therapists hadn’t helped, and six months after her husband died, Dana was frantically casting about for solutions. A consultation with UCLA’s neuropsychiatric unit convinced her that Youth Care’s therapeutic and educational program would finally make a difference.

Four months into his stay there, Brendan had earned a reputation as a temper-prone student who tried to shirk his obligations. So on the afternoon of June 27, when he complained to medical staff that he felt very sick, as if something were “crawling around” in his stomach, his concerns were dismissed. After 11 p.m., he woke up, complaining of stomach pain, and defecated in his pants. The on-duty monitors took him to the Purple Room, a makeshift isolation room used to segregate misbehaving students. There, he suffered a long night of agony, howling in pain and repeatedly vomiting and soiling himself. According to court transcripts and police reports, the two poorly paid monitors on duty did little more than offer him water, Sprite and Pepto-Bismol. They never telephoned the on-call nurse and waited until nearly 2 a.m. to contact the on-call supervisor, only to leave a voicemail. There was little else they felt they could do — Youth Care’s protocol on emergency services meant they were too low on the totem pole to call 911 themselves.

“They didn’t trust our judgment in emergency situations,” explains Josh Randall, a former Youth Care residential monitor, who wasn’t on duty that night. “If you’re working for $9.50 an hour on the graveyard shift, you don’t want to buck the system.” At any rate, the monitors had little expertise in how to respond — it was an entry-level job requiring only a GED, plus a CPR and safety course overseen by Youth Care itself.

When the morning staff arrived at 7 a.m., they discovered Brendan facedown on the floor of the Purple Room, his body already stiff with rigor mortis. The state’s chief medical examiner later determined that Blum had died of a twisted-bowel infarction, which requires emergency surgical intervention.

“It made me very angry that they couldn’t provide better emergency services for my son,” Dana Blum told the online magazine Momlogic. “I feel like he was murdered” — although, in fact, no court has ever found Aspen or its staffers guilty of murder. Blum, who, with the help of insurance and school district aid, paid Youth Care $15,000 a month to care for her son, made those remarks in 2009; she can no longer speak publicly about Brendan’s death, according to the terms of a settlement she reached last year in a wrongful death lawsuit against Youth Care and its parent company, Aspen Education.

The failure at Youth Care was not due simply to the carelessness of a few workers — a point underscored when a Utah court found that the threshold needed to pursue criminal negligence charges against the two monitors in 2008 wasn’t met and the charges were dismissed. And it wasn’t the only example of alleged negligence or abuse at treatment centers for adult addicts and “troubled teens” that are owned by Aspen’s parent company, CRC Health Group, according to a Salon investigation based on government reports, court filings and official complaints by parents and employees, along with interviews with former clients and staff.

Our investigation found previously unreported allegations of abuse and neglect in at least 10 CRC residential drug and teen care facilities across the country, including three I visited undercover in Utah and California. With rare exceptions, such incidents have largely escaped notice because the programs are, thanks to lax state regulations, largely unaccountable.

Court documents and ex-staffers also allege that such incidents reflect, in part, a broader corporate culture at Aspen’s owner, CRC Health Group, a leading national chain of treatment centers. Lawsuits and critics have claimed that CRC prizes profits, and the avoidance of outside scrutiny, over the health and safety of its clients. (We sent specific questions on these basic allegations to CRC and owner Bain Capital. CRC would answer only general questions; Bain did not reply.)

And CRC’s corporate culture, in turn, reflects the attitudes and financial imperatives of Bain Capital, the private equity firm founded by Mitt Romney. (The Romney campaign also did not reply to written questions.) Bain is known for its relentless obsession with maximizing shareholder value and revenues. Indeed, this has become a talking point of late on the Romney campaign trail; he bragged to Fox in late May that “80 percent of them [Bain investments] grew their revenues.” CRC, a fast-growing company then in the lucrative field of drug treatment, was perhaps a natural fit when Bain acquired it for $720 million in 2006. In conversations with staff and patients who spent time at CRC facilities since the takeover, there are suggestions that the Bain approach has had its effects. “If you look at their daily profit numbers compared to what they charge,” Dana Blum said of CRC’s Aspen division in 2009, “it’s obscene.” That point, ironically enough, was underscored by the glowing reports in the trade press about its profitability.

The purchase of CRC came seven years after Romney publicly announced his retirement as CEO of Bain Capital, where he had been in charge since its founding in 1984. But at the time of his departure, Romney worked out an arrangement to continue to share in Bain’s profits as a limited partner in the firm. Today, he is still an investor in 48 Bain accounts. Though he has refused to disclose their underlying assets, some information about them can be gleaned. For example, he has reported at least  $300,000 to $1.2 million, if not more,  in fluctuating annual earnings from Bain Capital VIII, the convoluted $3.5 billion array of related funds that owns both name-brand companies such as Dunkin’ Donuts and the lesser-known CRC Health Group. Most of these funds were made more attractive to privileged investors by being registered in the Cayman Islands tax haven. And Romney’s connections to CRC run even deeper: Of the three Bain managing partners who sit on CRC’s board, two, John Connaughton and Steven Barnes (with his wife), gave a total of half a million dollars to Restore Our Future, the super PAC supporting Romney. They also each donated the $2,500 maximum directly to his campaign.

Bain takes over

When Bain purchased CRC, it looked like an investment masterstroke. The company, founded in the mid-’90s with a single California treatment facility, the Camp Recovery Center, had quickly grown into the largest chain of for-profit drug and alcohol treatment services in the country, with $230 million in annual revenue. Under Bain’s guidance, its revenue has nearly doubled, to more than $450 million. CRC now serves 30,000 clients daily — mostly opiate addicts — at 140 facilities across 25 states. In the first five years after its acquisition, Bain had already extracted nearly $20 million in management-related fees from the chain, although Bain investors haven’t cashed in yet through dividends or an IPO.  Bain’s purchase, a leveraged buyout, also saddled CRC with massive debt of well over $600 million.

According to company executives and independent analysts, hands-on oversight of subsidiary companies is a hallmark of both Bain and CRC. Romney’s campaign literature boasts about Bain taking exactly this sort of direct role in helping to turn around failing companies. “Over the life of an investment, they have a strong management team willing to participate,” Sheryl Skolnick, an analyst with CRT Capital, a leading institutional brokerage firm, says of Bain.

The CRC acquisition immediately made Bain owner of the largest collection of addiction treatment facilities in the nation. Unlike some Bain Capital acquisitions, which led to massive layoffs, the company’s approach with CRC was to boost revenues by gobbling up other treatment centers, raising fees, and expanding its client base through slick, aggressive marketing, while keeping staffing and other costs relatively low. But that rapid pace of acquisition couldn’t be sustained in the mostly small-scale drug treatment industry alone. So Bain Capital and CRC set their sights on an entirely new treatment arena: the multibillion-dollar “troubled teen” industry, a burgeoning field of mostly locally owned residential schools and wilderness programs then serving, nationwide, about 100,000 kids facing addiction or emotional or behavioral problems.

One of CRC’s first acquisitions under Bain ownership was the Aspen Education Group. Founded in 1998 with about six schools, Aspen Education had expanded to 30 troubled-teen and weight-loss programs by 2006, including Youth Care of Utah. With Bain’s backing, CRC purchased Aspen for nearly $300 million in the fall of 2006.

Less than a year later, Brendan Blum was dead.

At the time of the CRC acquisition, Aspen already had a history of abuse allegations, including at least three lawsuits, and two known patient deaths, one by suicide. Featured on “Dr. Phil,” it grew out of schools inspired by the “tough-love” behavior-modification approach of the discredited Synanon program,  which was eventually exposed as a cult. By 2006, Aspen was facing a wrongful death lawsuit, later settled, over an incident in 2004 in which a 14-year-old boy, Matthew Meyer, perished from heat stroke just eight days into his stay at its Lone Star Expeditions wilderness camp in Texas. Nevertheless, less than a year after Meyer died, NBC’s “Dateline” extolled Lone Star as part of a puff piece on Aspen’s success with overweight teens. As an Aspen press release boasted, the show told how a rebellious student who did a stint at Lone Star “returned a month later with a new outlook on life.”

In October 2006, just nine months before Brendan Blum died and as Bain’s deal to purchase Aspen Education was being finalized, CRC received a far less upbeat assessment of Aspen’s services. Following some phone conversations, family therapist Elisabeth Feldman walked into CRC’s Cupertino, Calif., headquarters to see Dr. Thomas Brady, a psychiatrist then serving as CRC’s chief medical officer, in order to confront him about a host of issues at Youth Care. She had stumbled upon the problems while trying to help her son’s former girlfriend, a teenage girl who had suffered what Feldman called  “gross mistreatment” at Youth Care. Of particular concern to Feldman was a three-month delay before Youth Care hired a psychiatrist to assess the young woman’s deep depression and a failure to treat her Lyme disease. Feldman’s ultimately unsuccessful crusade to get the woman released had led her to seek the services of a Salt Lake City lawyer, Thomas Burton, who had settled two lawsuits against Aspen Education for fraud, neglect and abuse.

Feldman had been part of Brady’s professional referral network for years, but this visit wasn’t congenial. Feldman presented Brady with a 100-page sheaf of legal and corporate documents — including her affidavit describing “brutish punishment and isolation” at Youth Care — about Aspen Education programs in order to help support her charges of abusive treatment and neglect. These claims included reportedly covering up the alleged sexual assault of a female student by an Aspen employee at Turn-About Ranch in Utah; the girl was later duct-taped and restrained by staff, a former employee, Toni Thayer, told Feldman, after writing complaints about abusive staff conduct to management, state regulators and the Garfield County sheriff in 2004 — but no sanctions followed. (Subsequently, a lawsuit filed in June 2012 charged that staffers at the ranch engaged in the “torture” of a 15-year-old girl in 2005.) According to Feldman, Brady said he wasn’t aware of any problems at Youth Care or Aspen Education and sought to mollify her about Bain’s pending purchase of Aspen: “I have to trust that Bain did their due diligence,” she recalls him saying. Dr. Brady confirmed, by email, that he spoke on the phone and met with Feldman, but said he has “no recollection” of making those remarks. And he insists that the documents she brought didn’t support her claims of mistreatment. Even so, he says he took her concerns seriously and that CRC and Aspen conducted a thorough review. “I came to the conclusion,” he said, “there was no merit to the accusations.” He remained as CRC’s medical director until May 2009 and said that although he encountered a few “untoward event” cases at Aspen during his time there, he saw no “pattern” of unsafe care.

At any rate, Bain’s purchase of Aspen Education went ahead smoothly. When, months later, Feldman learned about Blum’s death, she was horrified to realize her warnings had had no effect. “For Bain and the big guys, nobody cared,” she says. “It was all about the money.”

Questionable deaths

When he died, Brendan Blum’s was the first publicly reported death due to apparent neglect in CRC’s 12-year history. But in the six years since Bain Capital acquired the company, there have been at least five more seemingly preventable deaths of patients at CRC’s residential programs. Since the Bain takeover, critics and former employees charge that corporate attitudes have too often emphasized cutting costs and limiting public scrutiny at the expense of safety and quality of care. These tendencies appear to have produced risky, potentially life-threatening practices — only a handful of which have drawn public attention.

Several lawsuits have been filed against CRC over mistreatment of its clients, but the company has never acknowledged any wrongdoing and has kept confidential any damage payments arising from legal settlements. CRC is a significant player in the scandal-prone, decentralized field of residential teen treatment that has more than 1,000 scattered facilities; the firm has nearly 36 therapeutic schools, wilderness sites and weight-loss programs catering to youth.

The latest lawsuit over CRC’s current practices was filed in January against CRC’s prestigious $40,000-a-month Sierra Tucson drug treatment center in Arizona, for the allegedly poor monitoring and treatment of what the lawsuit says was an obviously suicidal 71-year-old patient, Dr. Edward Litwack; the center’s own staff had assessed him as a “high” risk for suicide, requiring one-on-one supervision. He was reported missing last August, but it took two weeks for the staff to find his corpse on the grounds. Last October, after an investigation by Arizona regulators following Litwack’s disappearance found 42 major violations, the center was put on one-year probation. The regulators found that ill-trained monitors spent too much time patrolling on golf carts rather than actually interacting with patients. CRC had purchased Sierra Tucson in 2005 for $130 million as its “crown jewel” shortly before plans to sell CRC to Bain were announced. “Then the business side started controlling admissions,” says a former employee, who worked at Sierra Tucson before and after the CRC acquisition. “It doesn’t take a brain scientist to realize that if you reduce staff [in key programs] and add sicker patients, there’s going to be trouble.” With the addition of a new 44-bed lodge in 2007, staff at Sierra Tucson was stretched thin, former staffers say; by 2009, a state licensing office fined the facility for having insufficient staff to prevent high-risk patients from wandering off.

Other incidents suggest a corporate culture that often downplayed safety and quality of care. In 2010, at least two drug treatment patients died at the overcrowded New Life Lodge in Burns, Tenn., according to wrongful death lawsuits and an investigative series in the Tennessean. According to an account in the Tennessean, based on public records and interviews with people at New Life Lodge, one of the patients, a 29-year-old mother named Lindsey Poteet, had come down with pneumonia and was drifting into unconsciousness when she was driven in a private van to a Nashville hospital 30 miles away. The journey was undertaken on orders of the facility’s medical director, although another hospital lay just eight miles down the road. Poteet stopped breathing en route and died the next day in Nashville. The other, Patrick Bryant, died on his 20th birthday just four days after being admitted to New Life; his mother alleges that he’d been misprescribed several medications and had been unresponsive for hours before being discovered by staff.

A third patient, 18-year-old Savon Kinney, died last October just days after leaving New Life in a state of disorientation, his sister told the newspaper; his death sparked a state investigation.

After the Tennessean series appeared last summer and fall, the state’s Department of Mental Health froze all new admissions to the facility. (It was finally allowed to admit a smaller number of new patients in early April.) One former patient, Malea Fox, who had befriended Poteet at New Life, told me that she called state Medicaid (also known as TennCare), the facility’s primary funder, to complain that the facility was far too overcrowded for personalized care. “All they [New Life] care about is making money,” she said.

In 2009, the state of Oregon forced the closing of two teen programs run by Aspen Education. State investigators found nine cases of abuse and neglect at Mount Bachelor Academy in central Oregon, including incidents of “sexualized role play,” in which young patients were allegedly forced to do lap dances during therapy sessions. After Mount Bachelor and its director threatened costly lawsuits, the state’s Department of Human Services softened the language of the report; CRC claims the allegations were false (while also fighting $37 million in abuse lawsuits over the school’s pre-CRC practices). Even so, DHS “stands by our findings,” a spokesman says of the 2009 report. That same year, at SageWalk Wilderness School in Hampton, Ore., 16-year-old Sergey Blashchishen died of heatstroke on his very first school hike, in an incident eerily reminiscent of Matthew Meyer’s 2004 death in Texas. One morning in August, Blashchishen suited up in an 80-pound backpack; by afternoon, the heat had topped 80 degrees, and he was soon staggering, drifting off the trail, and complaining of dizziness and exhaustion. Staffers contended he was faking his symptoms and failed to call 911 until his pulse had stopped; that death is the focus of a negligent homicide investigation.

To CRC officials, the lawsuits, criminal investigations and state sanctions all come in response to isolated events, aren’t “systemic,” and shouldn’t reflect on the dedication and quality of a large company serving 30,000 trouble-prone teens and substance abusers each day. The company declined to respond to a memo outlining allegations made by alumni, parents and former employees about questionable practices at specific programs, citing a legal requirement to protect patient confidentiality. But a public relations consultant, Robert Weiner, who works closely with CRC and its most prominent board member, Gen. Barry McCaffrey, President Bill Clinton’s drug czar, did respond in general terms in a phone interview: “The people you cited can whine all they want, but that’s just a bunch of specifics we can’t talk about compared to 30,000 people a day we’re making better lives for.”

“In a human-run company there will be human errors in some cases,” he added. “But in other cases, it’s garbage.”

In a December 2011 press release in response to the Tennessean series, CRC vice president Jonathan Ciampi disputed criticism of CRC over the reported deaths, citing positive surveys of parents and clients, and certification by government regulators and accrediting agencies. “Safety and quality are our highest priorities.” And in a conference call last fall for investors, CRC’s new CEO, Andrew Eckert, discounted the developments in Tennessee as merely “unwelcomed bumps in the road.” In fact, later in the call he claimed that “CRC is in the process of staking its ground as the definitive leader in clinical excellence.”

Camp recovery: More patients, more revenue

Such claims of excellence do not seem to have pierced the canopy of the Santa Cruz redwoods, home to Camp Recovery, the first drug treatment facility CRC purchased in the mid-’90s. Nestled on 25 hilly acres in Scotts Valley, Calif., Camp Recovery is an idyllic setting for recovery for as many as 70 adults and teens at a time. Yet after Bain purchased CRC in 2006, according to former employees, safety and quality eroded,  while  state agencies periodically reported increasingly more troublesome findings after 2006 regarding conditions at the camp. “It got progressively worse,” says Tom Corral, a counselor who was employed there before CRC bought Camp Recovery and worked there on occasion after the Bain takeover. Meanwhile, prices were steadily jacked up from about $6,000 a month to as high as $18,000. Under Bain ownership, Corral says, “they’ve been under a lot of pressure to cut costs, and they’ve been squeezed for profit.”

What most alarmed Corral and other former employees was that ever sicker and more mentally disturbed patients kept being admitted. The governing view, Corral recalls, was, “You’ve got to keep them at all costs.”

Camp Recovery is registered with the state as a nonmedical facility, and so patients needing intensive medical or psychiatric care should be referred elsewhere. But such restrictions soon collapsed, say former staffers, in a drive for profits. “Certified nurses were reprimanded when we complained to the intake office,” says one former nurse. “When I didn’t want to admit a person who was falling down drunk, they wrote me up.” Former staffers say that Camp Recovery’s business staff even began to pressure nurses to knowingly admit patients with potentially deadly MRSA infections, which, the CDC warns, may require treatment by an infectious disease specialist. Shawn Bottoroff, a former clinical technician who left Camp Recovery last year, said that when she started in 2007, nurses were primarily responsible for determining who was stable enough for admission. But they were soon overridden by camp administrators seeking to rope in more clients, Bottoroff and other former workers say.

To Denise Murphy, a former director of the camp’s adolescent unit, the decline became especially noticeable in 2008, when a new executive director took over, Bobby Stearns, hand-picked by CRC, who was determined, according to complaints to the NLRB, to crush a unionization drive and keep down costs. “It was so dangerous there, they’re lucky they didn’t get sued,” Murphy says. According to complaints made by staff at the time to the now-reorganized California Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, CRC cut back on everything from drug-testing kits to staffing levels. In a 2009 interview, Stearns said any staff cuts were due to declining patient numbers. But eventually, the Department of Social Services, which has oversight over the facility’s 17-bed adolescent unit, confirmed that caseloads had soared and kids ran wild at night. The agency demanded corrective actions — improvements that former employees say were in large part ultimately abandoned.

Equally troubling, former staffers report a pattern that echoes the events surrounding the deaths of Brendan Blum and Lindsey Poteet at other CRC facilities: When patients face a medical crisis, ambulances are usually not summoned. Instead, “techs,” whose emergency training, the former employees say, is generally limited to a two-hour CPR course, are ordered by supervisors to use a van lacking medical equipment to drive patients to the emergency room in nearby Santa Cruz. The tactic, say former employees, helps prevent the facility from being flagged in the 911 system, risking unwelcome attention from state or local officials.

The administrative resistance to calling 911 was so pronounced that when one overmedicated, mentally disturbed patient fled the facility in hysterics one summer day in 2008, she was left to lie on the road outside the gate, screaming for help before collapsing into convulsions. One camp executive told staff on duty at the time, “Leave her alone. We don’t want to make a scene,” according to Bottoroff and other former staffers. It was left to neighbors to call 911. Nevertheless, the camp still makes more emergency calls than any comparable facility in the Santa Cruz area, according to addiction and ER doctors who reviewed 911 log data we obtained — perhaps a measure of just how ill many of the patients are at this nonmedical facility. That log showed 158 calls between January 2008 and August 2011. “That’s a lot of calls,” a local government official says. “It ought to be investigated.” Logged 911 calls represent only a small portion of total ER visits, the official observes, because it doesn’t account for people who arrive by other means.

Camp Recovery’s drive for secrecy was especially pronounced when it came to potential instances of sexual misconduct, violence or drug use among the adolescents in treatment, former staffers say. “There were several situations in which we were told by the director of the adolescent unit, per [current executive director] James Bailey, not to call 911,” says Bottoroff. Former staffers speak of wild nighttime teen assaults on weaker youth or even staff, and recount hushed-up incidents of underage girls having sex with adult male patients at their cabins. “They were trading favors for cigarettes and alcohol,” Bottoroff says of one such incident she encountered. In almost all such cases of on-site crime, according to an employee complaint to state regulators, the orders handed down from Stearns, the former executive director, in 2009 were clear: “We don’t contact the police.”

State investigators were rarely able confirm the most serious employee allegations on the few occasions when they bothered to investigate, a review of state reports shows. But this could be due to efforts by managers to cover their tracks. Trevor Bottoroff, a former Camp Recovery counselor and Shawn’s husband, says that sometimes managers would rewrite log sheets to make them seem more benign. At other times, supervisors would simply remove them. Murphy, the camp’s former adolescent director, came to see CRC as “the slumlords of treatment.” Other evasions are commonplace at Camp Recovery. The camp openly advertises that it offers prescription-based medical detox, though it is not licensed as a medical facility to do so.

A failure of oversight

But such complaints against CRC have rarely led to consequences for either their drug treatment or youth programs. The troubled teen industry in particular is a regulatory Wild West, with some states lacking any licensing system at all for these residential programs. Even some states that do license, such as Utah, appear unable to guarantee patient safety: about 10 young people are known to have died since 1990 while attending Utah residential and wilderness programs. Regulators often shield the teen care industry from genuine scrutiny, according to investigations by the GAO, congressional hearings in 2007 and 2008, and reports by such mental health advocates as the Bazelon Center and Mental Health America.

In California, regulation of drug treatment facilities appears especially ineffective. California’s Department of Alcohol and Drug Programs, for example, has never investigated the deaths of nearly 200 patients over five years at CRC’s 12 outpatient methadone clinics. Mostly likely, addiction experts say, the clients’ rampant substance abuse is the culprit, not sloppy practices at CRC, but that supposition has not been rigorously tested. In fact, Pennsylvania regulators cited two of CRC’s methadone clinics for failing to properly screen patients for drugs or narcotic use, a potentially deadly oversight. Weiner, the CRC spokesperson, said that CRC itself would doubtless look into any client deaths: “At least somebody’s going to wonder why they didn’t come in for their treatment the next day.”

“The programs have experienced the reality that there are no consequences if anyone dies,” says a knowledgeable ex-government official about California’s drug programs, including CRC’s methadone clinics, which have become the chain’s cash cow. With nearly 27,000 daily clients nationwide at  54 outpatient clinics, CRC founder Barry Karlin was dubbed by Treatment magazine “America’s Methadone King.”

Loose oversight seems to have been critical in enabling CRC to flourish. It’s hard to imagine, in particular, that without the scandalously weak monitoring of the teen treatment industry CRC’s Aspen division would be able to continue its harshly regimented, unproven behavior-modification methods and dicey emergency protocols. “Without regulations and enforcement, this profitable industry will continue to have actors that present unacceptable risks to the children they serve,” U.S. Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., said last year when introducing a federal oversight bill.

A culture of abuse and neglect?

This apparent lack of oversight in the teen industry, combined with a widespread view by providers that their charges are manipulative troublemakers, has allowed a toxic culture of psychological abuse and medical neglect to prevail, according to parents, alumni and federal officials. As Greg Kutz, a GAO investigator, said in testimony about the industry in general before Congress, “It seemed that the only way program managers would believe they [the students] were not faking it is if they stopped breathing or did not have a pulse.” That culture is visible even at Aspen’s most upscale residential programs, such as Island View in suburban Syracuse, Utah. One former student there, Colleen Davidson, now 20, who graduated from the program in 2009, recalls her alarm when she coughed up blood one morning as she stood at the bathroom sink. She says she was never allowed to see a doctor because by the time the nurse wandered by a few hours later, another student had rinsed the blood from the sink. “They assume you’re lying,” she says.

For months, CRC denied me press access to any of its facilities, so I visited Island View last August posing as a father of a troubled girl. During that visit, director Laura Burt confirmed this skeptical stance toward potential medical emergencies. She said the nursing staff would see my daughter immediately in case of a medical crisis but would monitor her if they suspected fakery: “We’re not going to rush her to the hospital if she’s just saying that and there is nothing that says it.”

In March 2008, Duane Bernard rescued his son Matthew, then 16, from another Aspen program, Adirondack Leadership Expedition in Saranac Lake, N.Y., after gleaning from one of his son’s monitored letters the brutal conditions he was enduring. Matthew, who was sent to Adirondack by his mother during a custody dispute, later told his father of food deprivation, neglect of serious medical complaints, and cruel taunting by instructors, including an incident when field staff  pressured one kid to lick clean a urine-soaked cup. Medical neglect, Duane Bernard says, was ingrained in Adirondack’s get-tough “wilderness therapy.” Father and son say that during Matthew’s monthlong stay, he was required to go camping in subfreezing weather with too-thin clothing and sleeping gear, and he soon developed severe numbness and frostbite in his right foot. But he wasn’t taken to an urgent care facility until shortly before his release and required eight months of medical treatment afterward.

Duane Bernard wrote in April 2008 to state officials alleging child abuse, enclosing Matthew’s written descriptions of his alleged maltreatment, but the state’s child protection agency said it had no jurisdiction over Adirondack. “They blew us off,” Bernard says.

I heard Matthew’s experience echoed in conversation after conversation with Aspen alums, many of whom suffer nightmares and PTSD-like symptoms. Hannah Sangillo of Bethesda, Md., now 19,  ended up at SUWS of the Carolinas, Aspen’s showcase wilderness program in North Carolina’s breathtaking Pisgah National Forest, in 2010. She now considers her 49-day summer stay “child abuse.” She recounts one of several instances of heat exhaustion she experienced during hours-long hikes designed to promote self-reliance and personal growth. Even on scorching, humid days, when temperatures soared into the mid-90s, groups of girls were saddled with 60-pound-plus packs, exceeding Girl Scout safety guidelines. “I was not able to walk straight,” she says of one incident. “I was stumbling and sweating profusely. I kept telling people I needed to stop and they said: ‘No, we can’t stop yet.’” She temporarily blacked out, only to be dragged to her feet by fellow campers and prodded along the trail at the urging of what SUWS calls its “highly trained” field instructors. By the end of the summer ordeal, nearly half of her small team of girls had collapsed during hikes, she says, without receiving any medical attention.

Throughout their time there, neither Sangillo nor Hannah Spungen, a 2007 SUWS graduate, ever saw a single staffer actually help young residents with medical problems. These included everything from heroin withdrawal to all-night vomiting caused by drinking from fecal-contaminated streams during their daily hikes.

Before I interviewed the two alumni, I met with Shawn Farrell, executive director of SUWS of the Carolinas, who insisted to me that emergency care is a top priority. (Subsequently, CRC declined to answer any questions about allegations of medical neglect at this SUWS program. Shawn Farrell, the executive director of SUWS of the Carolinas, insisted to me that emergency care is a top priority. He says field staff are instructed to radio in symptoms of any injuries or illness immediately to the base camp’s field medic and, if needed, arrange transport to a hospital only eight miles away. “We want the doctors to do the diagnosis,” not the outdoors staff, he says. But this policy appears to falls apart in the execution. In Spungen’s experience, “There’s no protocol in place to make sure it’s safe for you.”

These incidents seem to illuminate an institutional culture that allowed Sergey Blashchishen to die in 2009 before ever receiving emergency medical aid. As one government investigator told me about the field instructors at SageWalk, where Blashchishen died, “They were highly trained, but the culture overrode that.” The SageWalk Field Instructor Manual — like other Aspen manuals, vetted by CRC, according to a former CRC official — requires staff to go through a rigid “chain of command” before emergency help can be summoned. “There are inherent delays in a system like this,” the investigator observed. CRC spokesman Weiner defended those procedures: “If there’s a [medical] issue they should go to the top supervisors,” he said. “I don’t see how that’s wrong to make sure you’re doing the right thing. That’s why they’re not the boss.”

Yet Weiner also insisted that CRC is “aware of complaints and problems at Aspen and wants to make sure it has the best practices possible.” To that end, he pointed to a recent initiative by CRC to ensure that all its teen programs are certified by two leading accrediting agencies, CARF (the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities) and a body known as the Joint Commission, a 60-year-old industry-funded nonprofit that accredits thousands of health care programs in the United States. This is perhaps of scant comfort, given that members of Congress harshly criticized the Joint Commission in the wake of revelations of medical negligence at Walter Reed and other Joint Commission–accredited hospitals. Moreover, many facilities in one of the most notorious chains in the teen treatment field, Straight Inc., were approved by accrediting agencies, including the Joint Commission, until they shut down in the wake of lawsuits and state action. Some maintained their high ratings even after Straight Inc. and several of its spinoffs were hit by state investigations and at least 90 lawsuits alleging abuse.

No turnaround from the turnaround experts

Despite the accumulating lawsuits, state investigations and even criminal inquiries, Bain Capital has yet to force a major shake-up in the culture or leadership of CRC. Aspen co-founder Elliot Sainer and CRC CEO Barry Karlin remained in their executive posts until they retired in 2007 and 2010, respectively. Both now serve on the CRC board of directors. Trina Packard, the executive in charge at Youth Care when Brendan Blum died, remains in her post to this day.

Rather than instituting reforms, CRC seems to have responded to the series of lawsuits, in part, by requiring parents to sign elaborate contracts that feature sweeping “hold harmless” clauses even in the case of death. “This is a business-driven model: caveat emptor,” one Utah Education Department official conceded on background. The contracts leave parents like Julie Scheule, a Wisconsin mom, with little recourse when they suspect deception or abuse. In 2007, she sent her daughter, then 15, to an Aspen facility in Utah, since closed, called Aspen Ranch. Aspen, she now charges, “abused parental trust, abused our bank account, and abused the kids in their care.” She had a change of heart when she realized she was being hit with thousands of dollars in extra costs and flew to the ranch to remove her daughter. She recalls her daughter hugging her, trembling, and saying, “Please mama, take me out of here.”

Aspen uses what the teen treatment industry calls a “levels” model that grants more privileges and freedoms as students follow the rules, but imposes sanctions of varying severity on those who slip up or disobey.

Punishments were more often psychological than physical. According to former students, emotionally brutal isolation punishments and peer-driven encounter “therapies” were commonly employed to break down resistance, especially at Island View. For Colleen Davidson, the former student there who coughed up blood, the worst part was when students were prodded to confront each other about real or fabricated transgressions in harsh encounter sessions. (In fact, she says, they were very similar to the group therapies cited in the June “torture” lawsuit against Turn-About Ranch.) The sessions were so terrifying that girls resorted to desperate measures to avoid attending, according to Davidson. She recalls that some girls choked themselves to induce fainting; one rubbed feces in her own eyes to cause an infection.

“They break you down, but they don’t really build you back up,” she says of the Island View approach. “I have nightmares from it, and the memories are really awful.”

The no-data zone

CRC declined to address any program-specific allegations. A company spokesperson, Kristen Hayes, instead summed up the company’s approach in a written statement: “Our mission is to bring best practices to our industry in clinical excellence and quality patient care,” she wrote by email. “Our comprehensive risk and compliance protocols help to ensure the delivery of the safest, proven treatment processes.”

CRC has said that its teen care programs are based on recognized and evidence-based programs, including one called contingency management. But critics suggest that the approach as actually applied by Aspen is inconsistent with contingency management — which emphasizes primarily positive reinforcement — while alumni and lawsuits filed over the years by parents of former teen patients describe instead a distorted atmosphere of terror and punishment that undercuts their possible utility.

But there are virtually no independent, well-designed, peer-reviewed studies showing that any residential programs for troubled teens actually work — and none at all for the behavior-modification approaches employed by Aspen. Research funded by the Department of Justice and a literature review by the NIH both found, in the context of youth violence and crime prevention, that get-tough, discipline-based approaches generally do more harm than good.

Shy of evidence, CRC’s PR machine offers up testimonials from pleased parents and CRC-funded surveys of parents and students that report positive outcomes. Hayes put me in touch with one of these parents, the mother of a self-destructive, drug-abusing 15-year-old son whom she sent to Island View, the Aspen program Colleen Davidson attended, after other treatments had failed. “I didn’t want to stand around and wait for my child to die,” she says bluntly. Enrolling him in Aspen, she says, was the turning point. “I wish all kids were as lucky as my son,” she says.

And what can’t be washed away by good PR can always be described as an unavoidable tragedy. At Youth Care of Utah, admissions counselor Claire Roberts offered up this sort of soft-focus gloss when she told me about the death of Brendan Blum. “It was very traumatizing for us,” she said. Then she added philosophically, “These things happen.”

No plausible deniability

Mitt Romney may not know the details of Brendan Blum’s death, but it is difficult to imagine he wouldn’t be aware of the troubles facing CRC and the residential teen-treatment industry as a whole. Not only are two of his major campaign donors, Connaughton and Barnes, on CRC’s board, but two of his key advisors, Robert Lichfield and Mel Sembler, faced firestorms after allegations of abuse emerged regarding their own residential treatment chains.

Meanwhile, Ann Romney has said that she would make helping troubled teens a top priority as first lady. And CRC is roaring ahead with an expanded sales force; Eckert, the CEO, told investors in May, “We now have [sales] coverage in every major metropolitan area in the United States.”

The Romney campaign did not respond to queries about his investment in CRC. But candidate Romney has been outspoken about his belief that for-profit health care companies can flourish only without onerous regulations. “I had the occasion of actually acquiring and trying to build health care businesses,” he said during a primary debate last year. “I know something about it, and I believe markets work. And what’s wrong with our health care system in America is that government is playing too heavy a role.”

Crystal Manganaro likely has a different view. She is the mother of Matthew Meyer, the 14-year-old who died at Aspen’s Lone Star program in 2004, and has forcefully advocated for a federal crackdown on teen residential programs, including those run by Aspen. “For those of you who have not lived through losing a child due to negligence, you just cannot imagine what it feels like unless you have walked through it and deal with it every day of your life,” she said in 2009. “My son is dead and there is nothing I can do about that, but I’ll be damned if my son died in vain.”

This article was reported in partnership with The Investigative Fund at The Nation Institute, with generous additional support from the Fund for Investigative Journalism.
Close

Art Levine is a contributing editor at Washington Monthly.
« Last Edit: July 19, 2012, 03:48:58 PM by Reddit TroubledTeens »

Offline Reddit TroubledTeens

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 312
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.reddit.com/r/troubledteens
Re: In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney
« Reply #1 on: July 19, 2012, 03:35:35 PM »
Comments:

    neutron
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 08:30 AM EDT

It would be poetic justice if Bain Capital's executive staff would have to get their medical care from this company. Of course, they wouldn't; medical care plans are for us peons.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    flageek
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:13 AM EDT

Well... it's what happens when everything is or isn't a "profit center," or "fails the cost-benefit analysis." Because in the the new improved corporate world, it's how you serve the bottom line, not whether you receive any service, benefit, compassion or concern.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:23 AM EDT

Absolutely. Most abusive teen facilities are nothing BUT profit centers. Keep them there as long as you can and use abuse and brainwashing to change them, so the parents think it was actually successful. Then 10 years down the road they'll find out the truth when these kids, now adults, start realizing why they are all messed up and have PTSD etc. Assuming they don't kill themselves first, as so many have.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    sajwan
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 08:42 AM EDT

Unfortunately this pattern is also prevalent at nursing homes and all facilities where clients require intensive care. There are more lawsuits against nursing homes than teen care facilities.

This is not to excuse profit motive driving these facilities, but the reality is public funded institutions have just as wide spread issues. An expose on the failed cases occurring in foster care or children services would be just as disturbing.

But I get it, solving taking care of the aged or troubled is not the issue, it is bashing Romney during an election cycle. I did not see Obama's solution to this endemic problem in the article.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    jprfrog
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:06 AM EDT

The article is prolix, repetitive, badly edited. And the connection with Bain is a bit of a stretch. However, it illustrates a point that you would think needs little illustration: that the pursuit of profit as the highest good is not an effective way to provide service for those who are in need, and that in fact it can do positive harm.

I have a little experience with the "wilderness' industry, as my former step-daughter, a deeply troubled person, was a "client" at one in Utah for a couple of years. After she "graduated" she told me that the place was rife with drugs and sex, and as if to prove the point, she went on to become the highly successful ---in financial terms anyway --- madame of a call-girl ring in Salt Lake City. So there is at least one anecdotal point on the efficacy of that particular program. (Unless of course you think that her being able to own a BMW at the age of 20 showed how the American dream can work and never mind pesky things like legality.) I don't claim this as proof of anything, but I do suspect that this sort of thing quite common: that all too much of our world is riven with corruption, scamming, and legalized thievery that the only thing that matters is the bottom line. If that is the case, can anyone wonder why so many kids are cheating, lying, and drugging?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:10 AM EDT

Just because there are some non abusive wilderness programs out there, doesn't mean there aren't abusive ones. We just freed a young man over the age of 18 who was held against his will, without a court order for 2 months. I know thousands of people who were tortured and abused in Straight Inc. run by Mel Sembler, who is closely tied to Mitt Romney. It's a huge industry and children are being abused on a daily basis. Much of this happens under Aspen Education Group which is tied to Bain.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:13 AM EDT

You sound like a typical brainwashed parent. Cheating, lying and drugging. They are teenagers. MOST will get through it but we live in the THROW away society. Parents would rather throw their kids away to someone else than take responsibility. Get them REAL help, don't toss them aside and send them to UNQUALIFIED facilities, which about 90% of them are.

Read Help at Any Cost by Maia Szalavitz before you choose to throw your child away and ruin their life forever!!

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    KitchenGirl
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:58 AM EDT

Did you even read what he wrote?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    jprfrog
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:33 AM EDT

Well, we did try to get her real help, for about three years and nothing took. The wilderness thing was a desperate, last resort. I'm not sure that anything would have worked then, although she is, I hear, supposed to be doing better now. (Her mother and I have been divorced for over 10 years now.) I was not her parent, but her step-father, and as such I had little power of decision, since her own father was very much in the picture and IMHO complicated the situation with his own issues.

My point was not to make draw a general conclusion from one instance, albeit one that was vivid and painful for me, but to concur that there is probably a lot of bad stuff going on in that "industry" and that the problem is widespread and due to a deeper moral failing that permeates the whole society.

As for brain-washing, I suggest TIDE rather than other detergents.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:35 AM EDT

I appreciate the clarification jprfrog. Was the wilderness program part of Aspen Education. I have yet to find ONE Apsen facility for teens that does not have many reports of abuse.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    alphabits
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:05 AM EDT

Sajwan

"I did not see Obama's solution to this endemic problem in the article."

No, you didn't. Because it's all about ethics, both business and moral. What would you like President Obama to do? Force Congress to add another law to the ten million already out there, to cover the fact that everybody knows the difference between right and wrong?

Get real.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Abstar
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:04 AM EDT

And that these companies would handily ignore too

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:39 AM EDT

You get real..

“Nineteen states have no laws or regulations related to the use of seclusions or restraints in schools.”

“GAO found no federal laws restricting the use of seclusion and restraints in public and private schools and widely divergent laws at the state level.”

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08146t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08713t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08696t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    sitka0230
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:07 PM EDT

This is the bullshit which Sajwan for which Sajwan is known. What does the article have to do with Obama? Absolutely nothing.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Superman1
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:10 PM EDT

Face reality. Nursing homes, institutions for the physically and mentally troubled, etc, tend to be caretaker institutions. They tend to pay very low wages for the maintenance staff. What caliber people do you expect when such wages are paid? In addition, people at the top of their game don't especially want to work in caretaker institutions. Again, this limits additionally the quality of the maintenance staff.

K-12 teachers I know want to work with the gifted, not the challenged, and they want to be assigned to schools in safe neighborhoods with prestigious rankings. Professors I know want to teach/do research at the Ivy League/Stanford level institutions, not Boola-Boola Community College.

Bain or whoever runs these institutions recognizes the reality and tries to make whatever they can of an abysmal situation.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    meSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:48 PM EDT

    Bain or whoever runs these institutions recognizes the reality and tries to make whatever they can of an abysmal situation

"Bain or whoever runs these institutions recognizes the reality and tries to make whatever they can off of an abysmal situation."

It seems you left out a word.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Chelsea Kapela
    Thursday, Jul 19, 2012 12:27 AM EDT

Precisely. It is disgusting that anyone can write off dozens of deaths and hundreds of substantiated claims of abuse as mere bumps in the road on a path towards greater good. No matter what your political affiliation, one would hope that human lives and dignity would come before profits (idealism, I know) and further that media would actually COVER things such as this instead of focusing so heavily on our current president's college affiliations and other vague connections.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    maisiecat54
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 09:20 AM EDT

I want to know why we are supposed to grant corporations freedom of speech, while injured parties are silenced by non-disclosure agreements when a civil suit is settled.

If you're wealthy and powerful enough and cause damage to people, you get to make your victims shut up about it-- and no one is warned against those doing the harm.

Everybody ready for the Olympic cheer?

U.S.A!! U.S.A.!! U.S.A.!!!!!

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Jack Hughes
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:25 AM EDT

Why? Because that's what happens in a corporatocracy where bribery is legal and honesty is for losers.

America has wealth care, not health care.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    LibertyTree
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:27 AM EDT

Utterly ridiculous. They are shooting people in the streets where Obama used to live! Guilt by association is the best you guys can do to distract from Obama's dismal record as president and Romney's "sterling record?"

Why not do an article weighing off Romeny's business and gubernatorial experience vs. Obama's experience in politics and the professional world prior to the presidency? Oh right, because then Obama comes off looking like shit. This is the last fucking time I waste my an instant of my life on Salon.

The 4th estate is now an official branch of the Democratic party.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Gary LeeSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:45 AM EDT

Promise?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Despair
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:24 AM EDT

You may find this hard to believe, but not everything in life needs to have an Obama offset. This article wasn't about Obama, and in some respects it wasn't even about Romney. It was about abuses that are allowed to occur when the bottom line is, well, the bottom line.

Think for just a minute, if that's possible. How would you feel if your child were in any of the programs described here and suffered the same fate as some of those described? Take politics out of the equation. Forget Rmoney and Obama. You have your child in a program for which you are paying tens of thousands of dollars - per month (so you're already in the 1%, but that's another issue) - and your child is being supervised at night by minimum wage employees with nothing more than a GED and no authority or skill to take action in an emergency. Does this seem right to you? If that's okay with you, then we as a nation have a very serious problem.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    GusdiZSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:29 AM EDT

Typical right wing attempt to attack those who brought the issue up and change the subject so they do not have to actually engage in CO-mmunication.

Rather like the corporations they venerate as people.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    sitka0230
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:18 PM EDT

Others have already addressed the idiocy of most of your tirade, so I will focus on only one aspect. Romney is still profiting from Bain. If Obama had business interests that profited from questionable practices, then, surely, you wouldn't think discussing it is off limits.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    jhudson2
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 01:16 PM EDT

Oh, you're finding information on the internets that causes you cognitive dissonance?

Well boo-hoo.

Have you tried Pravda Fox News? I hear they pander to the stupidity and bigotry of your kind.

Now skedaddle! You don't want to miss the next short bus leaving for wingnut fantasyland.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    aldenSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 08:30 PM EDT

Buh-BYE!!

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    DSMAT5
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:41 AM EDT

I'm all in favor of capitalism. I own a variety of investments and by following the advice of my financial counselor over the past few decades, I was able to retire in modest comfort a couple of years ago.

BUT when medical care is generating huge profits that are going to stockholders and top administrators, then money is being sucked from the system instead of paying for the actual care. And since in almost all cases, the bill is paid by insurance companies (i.e., all the people who have policies) and the taxpayer (for those who are uninsured), then WE are being ripped off.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    DanielGreeSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:27 AM EDT

Isn't this one more example since Prop 13 in California that Americans like to get services on the cheap?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    odetteroulette
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:27 AM EDT

This situation is unconscionable. I'm beginning to think we're going to have to find a way to remake the entire culture and teach people that the corporate way of existence, where profits mean more than people, is a complete crock of shit.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    wjl5926Salon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:28 AM EDT

The problem, as I see it, is not that there are or are not abusive teen therapy programs. I suppose "abuse" is in the eye of the beholder.

However, death of a patient in one of those programs is a pretty good indicator of trouble within the organization of that therapy program.

An indication that the protocols/personnel/training are deficient in some ways.

The only way to illuminate/eliminate the "trouble" is to have concise/focused inspections by an accrediting agency.

An agency that has no financial incentive to see the program continue in its current form.

IE: Regulation.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:35 AM EDT

This article mentions the Government Accountability Office reports from 2007 to 2009. There are at least four of them, and here are the links:

GAO Investigation Documents/Video:

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08146t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08713t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08696t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdhsk-T6krs (Greg Kutz, VIDEO of testimony to US Congress)

And here are a couple excerpts:

During 2005 alone, 33 states reported 1,619 staff members involved in incidents of abuse in residential programs. GAO could not identify a more concrete number of allegations because it could not locate a single Web site, federal agency, or other entity that collects comprehensive nationwide data.

And in another report:

Nineteen states have no laws or regulations related to the use of seclusions or restraints in schools.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    WebDiva
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:37 AM EDT

oops Reposting with Hyperlinks. Sorry for the double post.

This article mentions the Government Accountability Office reports from 2007 to 2009. There are at least four of them, and here are the links:

GAO Investigation Documents/Video:

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08146t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08713t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08696t.pdf

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09719t.pdf

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wdhsk-T6krs (Greg Kutz, VIDEO of testimony to US Congress)

And here are a couple excerpts:

During 2005 alone, 33 states reported 1,619 staff members involved in incidents of abuse in residential programs. GAO could not identify a more concrete number of allegations because it could not locate a single Web site, federal agency, or other entity that collects comprehensive nationwide data.

And in another report:

Nineteen states have no laws or regulations related to the use of seclusions or restraints in schools.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    sitka0230
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:59 AM EDT

Excellent investigative reporting. Due to the length, I have not completed reading it, mainly skimming the various sections. As such, my statement may be a bit presumptuous.

Articles like this underscore the problem with many for-profit models for public services. I am a firm believer that certain services should not be left to the whim of the market. These include, but are not limited to, all aspects of health care; incarceration, public works (roads, water sanitation, etc.), and defense.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    morefunky
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:04 PM EDT

The same type of trash the radical left dug up on Sarah Palin in a matter of a very few days. Our left wing radical media with organizations like Salon and MSNBC have never contributed anything of value. I guess they are non-partisan like tax free organizations like media matters and many other similar organizations supported in some cases by my tax dollars and tax free foundations.

People around here are scared regardless of their occupations. The only ones who aren't are mostly liberal college professors who try to justify the socialism of Obama.

For those who make big wages and I am sure most of bloggers are well to do, they have no idea what made this country.

For all you nastiness against Romney, we pretty much know Obama is not only arrogant but wants to socialize our nation and he uses every devious method to work towards that goal why some blindly continue to support him.

Obama slipped the other day when he did not have his teleprompter in front of him and finally blurped out what he really stands for. So we learn no one ever started anything on their own. I heard in the last few days from those of the left that the government started the internet. Here I thought Gore did that. No credit to those who made computers and who made it possible for the government to have the tools to do it.

Rich against poor, racism and a host of other things the left uses to try and downgrade conservatives reminds me of the gutter. Obama can not defend his administration in no way so dig up dirt on anyone who questions his motives.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    meSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:50 PM EDT

I don't see this article as "The same type of trash the radical left dug up on Sarah Palin in a matter of a very few days"; this level of detail takes much more time to research and document.

This is less about Romney, and more about the culture promoted by "greed is good".

There's a single reason that private insurance has 25% overhead for expenses, and Medicare has only 3%; greed.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    morefunky
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 08:48 PM EDT

Medicare 3%. Same type of deceit I see on TV news all day every day. Obama's greed is to control this nation by way of socialism, dictatorship if possible!

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    coralsea
    Thursday, Jul 19, 2012 02:25 AM EDT

Nice to see moreflunky has yet to move beyond his disgusting ignorance.

..we pretty much know Obama is not only arrogant...

Yep. He's still black. Hopefully in his second term you'll finally find a way to accept that salient fact and move on.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Superman1
    Thursday, Jul 19, 2012 09:26 AM EDT

"I heard in the last few days from those of the left that the government started the internet."

All the research that provides the underlying foundation of the Internet was funded by the Federal government, much of it having been done in the 60s. It was demoed in a variety of forums, especially the ARPA-net, and when all the risk had been removed by government funding, was then exploited by industry for huge profits.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    meSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:24 PM EDT

Wonderful, eye-opening article. When it comes to for-profit health care, the Fortune article said it best:

    "greed is one addiction for which there is no easy cure"

For-profit health care has the same bad incentives as for-profit prisons; the drive for more people to process for as long and as cheaply as possible. People stop being people and become raw materials to be exploited.

Remove the profit incentive, and the focus can change to applying the appropriate treatment for the person.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    BIGG D.
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 02:37 PM EDT

Thank you, I was about to write something similar. The conception of greed as money addiction needs to be more widespread, in my opinion. Think of it as a syndrome: overindulgence, sociopathy, survival-anxiety, narcissism, etc. Recognize it as a disease and maybe we can start finding cures. It's certainly more destructive than drug addiction or any other kind. And thanks for mentioning prisons, one of my main issues.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Birdman5Salon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 12:36 PM EDT

But CRC made a big profit for Bain. Why be upset, nothing else matters.

Curiously enough, the 15,000 Dollars a month (!) paid to CRC to care for the boy came from insurance and public funds. So much for evil big government!

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    fishfry
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 01:17 PM EDT

This Bain stuff's not going to fly. Obama's top bundler Jonathan Lavine was in charge of Bain during the layoffs at GST Steel.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/07 ... l-layoffs/

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Elisabeth_Feldman
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 01:42 PM EDT

Thank you Art Levine for getting this story out in its full horror.

I am Elisabeth Feldman, the former therapist who's son's ex girlfriend was kidnapped in July of 2004 to one of of Aspen's residential treatment centers, subjected to psychological torture 24/7 for 15 months. Also, by coincidence, I knew Dr. Thomas Brady for 20 years as a trusted colleague prior to his appointment to CRC/Bain as VP and Chief Medical Officer.

As I started my effort to get this girl released I called Dr. Brady (prior to his employment at CRC) because I knew he had experience with adolescents and thought he might know about these programs. He gave me the most stark answer about what the likely outcome - the kids get broken; either brainwashed or hardened. Many of the families are shattered afterwards. This was approximately one year before his employment at CRC .

For six years I've been watching the horror and doing what I can to stop it. All the while I've been asking myself these questions:

How can someone like Dr. Brady close their ears and shut their eyes to the abuse and gross financial exploitation of children?

How can such horrors go on with barely any notice in our media saturated country?

Why are these crimes going largely unprosecuted?

The only connection I can make is Nazi Germany. I don't mean to say that CRC/Bain are Nazis but the phenomenon is unique in out country.

The connection to Romney is this: CRC/Aspen is the worst example of free market capitalism ~ no regulation, profit is king. Leaving the care of the powerless to the bottom line is abusive, exploitive, neglectful and deadly.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    oldirishman
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 04:01 PM EDT

This is VERY TYPICAL of conservative moral stances, where desire for profit override need to protect human life! The same conservatives rail against abortion. Go figure! Willard (Mitt) Romney always says he is a moral man. This story seems to call that assertion into question. He still has an investment in Bain Capital, and oversight would seem to be appropriate. To vote for someone is similar to making an investment, and we need all the facts, before making a decision to or to not vote for Mr. Romney.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    spleenSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 08:12 PM EDT

This article, which I found devastating as the sister of someone who is an expert in the treatment of addiction and behavioral issue, touches on the real problem with Bain, which is not simply that it falls into the category, venture capitalism. Like any business label, this one only describes a model, not necessarily the modus operandi of every company which falls within the category. Everyone in this country understands that corporations are legally obligated to make a profit for their shareholders. The question is, where is the line that delineates the difference between healthy profit and obscene profit that entails causing undo hardship to workers and consumers? And for what? So some billionaire can make a few more million dollars that he or she and their extended families could not possibly spend in several lifetimes?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    Humanitarian Do Good Bomber
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 10:13 PM EDT

bboooooooooor......

ing.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    CyclingFoolSalon Core Member
    Wednesday, Jul 18, 2012 11:03 PM EDT

Bain owned a company part of whose business was the disposal of aborted fetuses. Someone has to do that, but one would assume Mitt would be careful about having a stake in such an endeavor. Guess not, so no one should be surprised at his profitting from any legal business. It's okay to keep pointing these things out, but don't expect any mea culpas from Romney. Such is not part of his philosophy of capitalism.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    ariositoSalon Core Member
    Thursday, Jul 19, 2012 03:27 AM EDT

Mitt Romney believes that “markets work” in private care. They may do in theory, but in reality they do not work quickly enough, particularly in the care of vulnerable people. There are countless examples of this from many countries: incompetence, neglect, cruelty and abuse remain undetected for years before markets do their job of destroying the bad providers.

Markets work only if consumers are well-informed and have the power and the will to act on what they know. This condition rarely applies in the markets where Bain Capital decided to invest – private care for vulnerable older people, disturbed or dependent people or “troubled teens.” Unregulated institutions are free to use deceptive marketing, conceal essential information, cover up failure and gag and vilify their rare accusers. Perversely, the high fees they charge may give them more power over their customers, because people don’t like to admit that they’ve been suckered.

The care of vulnerable people, especially troubled children, should be based on professional and vocational principles and not as a source of profit. Vulnerable and troubled people cannot be commoditized. They require individual attention and the cost and success of any program for them cannot be predicted in advance. They are not suitable for any pre-conceived business model and any institution which treats them honestly cannot bind itself to set performance and financial targets.

Any for-profit residential care business poses inherent risks for vulnerable people. Cost pressures can readily induce such a business to skimp on staff numbers and quality (isolated institutions can be a magnet for sadists and perverts). It may well sedate its inmates, or use fierce and cruel regimes because they are cheaper than effective supervision and care. Such a business is always under pressure to boost turnover and utilization. That may well induce them to accept unsuitable inmates and issue false prospectuses to relatives and carers.

Art Levine’s problems suggests that all of these problems were present in institutions run by the companies acquired by Bain Capital – and that Bain made them worse.

Romney was not responsible for those acquisitions but he still has great influence over Bain Capital. Has he ever used that influence to ensure higher ethical and operational standards at Bain-owned companies, especially those dealing with vulnerable people? Or does he just collect money from Bain (in tax havens) without caring where it comes from?

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag

    wdtony
    Thursday, Jul 19, 2012 03:59 AM EDT

CRC and Bain Capital get away with the torture and deaths of teens in their care while making huge profits. Mitt Romney associates with two of the most notorious teen torturing chain's founders, while his wife suggests a desire to work with kids if her husband is elected (wtf?). There is no way Mitt Romney is unaware of this issue. As far as I'm concerned, those profits are blood money. Great article, good to see this information out in the open.

    Permalink
    Reply
    Flag
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline damanamanit

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 28
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney
« Reply #2 on: July 24, 2012, 05:27:34 AM »
This whole thing is disgusting.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Reddit TroubledTeens

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 312
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.reddit.com/r/troubledteens
Re: In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney
« Reply #3 on: August 04, 2012, 09:40:43 AM »
Here is the journalist, Art Levine, discussing his research into abuse allegations and deaths at Bain Capital's 'troubled teen' facilities on The Thom Hartmann Show:

In part one, Art Levine talks about Romney's connection to the troubled teen industry through Aspen, CRC Health & Bain Capital. He also tells of Brendan Blum's tragic & horrific death at Youth Care of Utah (http://youtu.be/FtIDQimsfl8) [10:04].

In part two, Levine describes how he went undercover to Aspen 'troubled teen' facilities, posing as a family member interested in placing a child. He also touches on Romney's connection to Mel Sembler, the founder of Straight Inc. (http://youtu.be/wSeH_MHJP68) [7:25]
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Reddit TroubledTeens

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 312
  • Karma: +1/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.reddit.com/r/troubledteens
Re: In-depth article on Aspen, CRC, Bain & Romney
« Reply #4 on: August 04, 2012, 09:41:49 AM »
Art also appeared on Mark Levine's nationwide radio show to discuss the article and his research, archive is here: http://marklevinetalk.com/how-romney-pr ... ild-abuse/
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »