Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
New Database of TTI lawyers -- what are your thoughts?
Anonymous:
.
eric:
--- Quote from: "Wayne Kernochan" ---
Eric, why don't you ask Kathryn Whitehead or Brian Lombrowski what they think of this?
--- End quote ---
Because I don't answer to either Kat or Brian? I don't know the point of that question Wayne.
I do know that there are other defense attorneys who have expressed their support for the site, and have even supplied me with some names. Does that matter?
Oh, and Wayne, I missed this question from you:
--- Quote ---Have you asked a lawyer if this is legal? I would. It could be construed as harassment
--- End quote ---
Yes. I have. Also, see above. It is in no way harassment whatsoever. Not even close.
cum guzzler:
.
Ursus:
--- Quote from: "Wayne Kernochan" ---Actually, until they're convicted, they're not
That's my point. The presumption is innocence. This is an effort to keep an innocent person from getting a fair shake
When they're found guilty, I say, have at 'em, but until then, I don't see the merit in trying to keep someone from getting a fair trial. It may be well within your rights to do this, but is it right?
Eric, why don't you ask Kathryn Whitehead or Brian Lombrowski what they think of this?
--- End quote ---
Umm... WHO exactly are you talking about when you say, "until they're convicted, they're not?" Are you referring to the program and/or individuals employed by the program, who are presumably being sued? Or, the attorneys who opt to represent them?
Anonymous:
.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version