General Interest > Feed Your Head
What Are You Looking At?
Xelebes:
--- Quote from: "ajax13" ---
--- Quote from: "Xelebes" ---There is only tenuous evidence that it truly was experimentation. Senator Ervin stipulated that The Seed prove itself to be experimental and issue the forms. The Seed didn't do this and so folded. Now, we could say that it was experimental before it was demanded to be shown to be experimental, but I think that misses the point of the stipulation in the first place. There are two possible states before that: Art Baker was winging an experiment and gathering some data but not enough data to satisfy the experiment stipulations or Art Baker was winging a private enterprise and gathering no data. I find it odd that Ervin felt himself compelled to stipulate it.
--- End quote ---
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
.
Xelebes:
Eh, I'm not here to call him any names or to dismiss what he has to bring to the table.
ajax13:
Claiming, with no evidence to support the idea, and lots to refute it, that US intelligence gave up B-mod experiments in the mid-sixties constitutes "bringing something to the table", but pointing out fundamental inaccuracies in a public statement is hair-splitting?
Anonymous:
.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version