Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry

Carey Bock Has Her Judas Gold

<< < (8/18) > >>

scottT:
Please wwaspie,  everyone here already knows how to distract attention from the real issue by attacking some bogus "straw man".  Whether or not SPOTS herself was sitting in the deposition room is utterly irrelevant.  The ONLY issue anyone cares about is whether or not Carey did or did not testify that she received $12,500 from WWASPS.

If -- as I requested earlier today -- Ms. Bock herself will say whether she did or did not accept any monetary or other consideration from WWASPS or its satellites,  that would be vastly stronger evidence than ANY second or third hand account of her testimony.

Now of course,  in the court of public opinion, silence is a form of adoption of the statements made.  However,  if Ms. Bock would now DENY making such statements in her deposition about receiving money for email records,  I can see how it might upset somebody who thought they were shelling out good money to get a witness who can keep the story straight.

Anonymous:
Okay, I'm confused.  Was Carey deposed by PURE's lawyers or WWASPS?

Second, what this about a "preliminary injunction" against PURE?  Seems to me this is a very significant issue and one which should not be side-stepped and/or brushed under the carpet.

Anyone have a link to the court document that details the specific terms of the preliminary injunction?  

Thanks!

 :smile:

Antigen:
No, that really doesn't answer everything either.

Aren't sworn depositions public domain? Can't we see the content and guess for ourselves the beliefs or motivation of various players?

At the bottom of it, going all the way back to May when Carey came over here after being banned from the Treckers' list, was Carey making unpopular statements and observations about Sue and PURE.

Yes, I know that the Treckers' list predates PURE by years. But it also seems plausible that the effort was hijacked by PURE.

And I still haven't gotten any satisfactory answer to my questions about them, either. By your reasoning, this conspicuous silence would constitute affirmation; i.e. there is no difference between WWASP and PURE but the brand names.

If that's the case, why, exactly, should any of us care if one recruiting outfit is suing another, who wins or if Carey managed to extract some financial gain for herself and her kids from the whole deal? From the start, the whole idea was to get the truth out.
Time's fun when you're having flies.
--Kermit the Frog
--- End quote ---

Cayo Hueso:

--- Quote ---On 2003-12-11 18:03:00, Antigen wrote:

From the start, the whole idea was to get the truth out.

--- End quote ---


Somehow that idea seems to have gotten lost somewhere.
But this is far from demonstrating that the authorities must interpose to suppress these vices by commercial prohibitions, nor is it by any means evident that such intervention on the part of the government is really capable of suppressing them or that, even if this end could be attained, it might not therewith open up a Pandora's box of other dangers, no less mischievous than alcoholism and morphinism.
Ludwig Von Mises
--- End quote ---

Anonymous:
Supply and Demand.  That's what this industry is all about and nobody knows that better than outfits like PURE and WWASPS.  For Carey to have profited in some way from her association with either of these 2 groups seems only fair when you consider the self-serving agenda of these two organizations.  

 :smokin:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page