Oh, I was quite serious. However, I think I rather prefer the real deal, the dark and dirty DannyB ... to the more "professionally polished" version. I suspect that there might be some key elements lost in the translation, so to speak.
Why would you want a rebuttal, if you have no intention of being objective?? Is their a reason you have to consistently undermine everything I do here on fornits??
< sigh > Ya know, Danny, you are your own worst enemy. Why do you so frequently assume the
worst possible interpretation of someone's intentions? I guess I should say that I can't really speak for anyone else here, but... this seems to have been *my* experience with you. (That said, I could also be wrong, and misunderstanding something, and guilty of the very thing I chide you for.)
Where do you read that I "have no intention of being objective?" What did I say that caused you to interpret that I was "consistently undermin[ing]" you? Most of the time, I'm too busy with other stuff to even bother injecting myself in your battles, colorful as they may be.
I'll admit, I don't mind an occasional spar with you on the threads, but... there's a limit. My cutoff point being, apparently, quite a bit lower than yours.
Finally, do you really believe I am dark and dirty, just want to know??
Lol. "Dark and dirty" refers to the raw uncut or less cut version, the implication being that its power, worthiness of interest, flavor, etc. has not been marred or damaged by excessive pruning or prettying up. E.g., dark and dirty stout ale, dark and dirty Cabernet, dark and dirty apple cider, etc. The appearance of the brew or extract is more opaque, the flavor more pronounced, having not been excessively filtered.
It was meant as a complement.
Why is it you can't comment on the information brought forward that contradicts what Wayne has said??
In the interest of fairness and the furthering of discussion, I've been trying to stay somewhat on the fringes. It seemed that, thus far, both pov's were being adequately expressed. And I thought you were doing a great job with the rebuttal. However,
you are the only one who can really state your case like that.
Is there a reason you can not see my side of this and look at it reasonably??
Am I nothing but a liar, someone you can't trust.??
Have I shown you a character trait that is deceitful, treacherous and totally insensitive to others??
Is there a part of me I have shown you that I am unaware of that could rape, sodomize, have a 14 yr old
child (young woman) beaten and kicked senseless by 20 people (twice) then take the same child and tie her to the back of a Van and
drag her around a black top parking lot, have a young girl 17 stand up in front of a house and ask everyone
if they want to rape her, then proceed to rape her myself, then on another day sodomize 2 young men including the author of the book??
Is this what you mean by dark and dirty??
Please do tell me Ursus if this is where you are going?? If you have been so effected by me that you can not even be objective anymore.
That your damaged emotions will allow you to entertain vindictiveness and revenge.
Mmm. Again, I think your speculations here are, as I mentioned above, presuming a bit much. I trust that ample opportunity to discuss specifics will come up in the soon to be resuscitated rebuttal thread?