Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Straight, Inc. and Derivatives

The Wiz is Flushed From Cover

<< < (2/3) > >>

ajax13:
Never registered, he wasn't qualified.

Ursus:

--- Quote from: "ajax13" ---Never registered, he wasn't qualified.
--- End quote ---
Ya sure? Did he try? :rofl:

My guess is that he didn't, cuz that'd a real stretch. Pity, though. Cuz if he did, his goose would be cooked, so to speak. Talk about fraudulent representation, lol.

ajax13:
"My work is restricted to the application of the “Alcoholics Anonymous 12 Step Program” relating to
alcoholic or addicts under a contract for services with AARC being a non-profit corporation of Alberta
which program does not fall within the definition of a “health service” under the Act."
http://stopaarc.org/letter_to_college_psychologists.pdf

"Alcoholics Anonymous AA meetings are Free and conducted by alcoholics."
 http://www.alcoholicsanonymous.com/

"Treatment Fees
 Alberta resident (Per Day)
$150.00
Out-Of-Province Fees (Per Day)
$160.00"

"AARC is unlike any program in Canada."
http://www.aarc.ab.ca/aarcProgram.php

The Wiz is Clinical Director of a $50 000 per year AA program.

Anonymous:
.

ajax13:
:bump:

As All About Receiving Cash continues to try to destroy anyone who has been fool-hardy enough to publicly tell the truth about the unlicensed, unregulated, behaviour-modification program, (formerly known as Kids of the Canadian West), the letter referred to above is proving to be a source of much consternation.  Like any good organized criminal, the Wiz had any documents of import trundled over to AARC parent and lawyer Lojek.  The idea of course being that any documents are subject to attorney-client privilege.  Once CBC dumped the seventh-grade notes that constituted AARC treatment records into the public forum, the rush to cover up went into full swing.  But somehow, this little tidbit, which is essentially an admission that AARC charges $50 000 per head, per annum, to attend AA meetings, and a completely dishonest denial of the client experience in All About Receiving Cash (Anger Rap in AA? What dat is? What did Bill Wilson say about Zero Club, anyhow?) slipped out.  AARC is apparently trying to hang the blame on persecuted whistle-blower Amy Sparks, currently the victim of yet another SLAPP suit.  But what is the origin of the smoking gun that spells out in no uncertain terms that the Wiz has been defrauding people for twenty years running?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page