Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Daytop Village
TC's- The Psychology of Anti-Psychology
Anonymous:
--- Quote ---On 2004-04-22 15:05:00, notworking wrote:
"I like that people-who-couldn't-be-real-scientists theory. Like I am going to believe the opinion of anyone who can't even freakin' SPELL.
Beleive noone, but never let the spelling of another get in the wway of what is inside is my opinion
Real scientists or no, they can at least use the language correctly.
< Who carse really? Look for the gem in all.
I also like the attack on language used in psychology -- i.e., I don't like these words because I don't understand them.
I agrre that tyhe basic terminology in psychology ois bullshit, and only take moments to understand, but still don t connect to anything in reality.
ANY field of study, including math, has terms that seem weird to outsiders. Take, for example, "imaginary number."
Yes, but at least, they are solid, and objective.. Man is forever moving, and we should stop tryiong to define him in order to fix him.. It may be pleasing for the practitioner, but does little for the patient.
But the very best part is, THERE'S NO ARGUMENT.
Agreed (:
Just some guy (or
woman) spouting his uniformed, misspelled opinion. The writer isn't anti-psychology, he's anti-INTELLECTUAL. Which, dear friends, is a very different thing. "
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
It is so obvious that the previous writer is Paul St. John. What is that all about?
And the first post is undoubtedly plagiarised - stolen and past off as your own, PSJ!
Paul St. John:
--- Quote ---On 2004-07-11 00:39:00, Anonymous wrote:
"It is so obvious that the previous writer is Paul St. John. What is that all about?
And the first post is undoubtedly plagiarised - stolen and past off as your own, PSJ!"
--- End quote ---
Well, of course, it was me.. I am the only one 'round here who quotes, and then posts right within the 'quote', in bold writing.
That was my original writing. I have no proof. You can beleive it or not. LOL.. Anyone who knew me would never accuse me of plagarising the work of another!
Paul St. John
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[*] Previous page
Go to full version