Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry
Candid Camera on Carey
Antigen:
So then I guess I should take that as "Hell no! We don't give a flying run at a rollin' doughnut about any stupid class action on behalf of the kids! All we care about is revenge against Carey!"
Is that inaccurate?
BTW, this is why I don't try to control the dialog around here. There are plenty of places on the net for controled, focused discussion. This is something different. This is a free-for-all where nobody's hiding nothing from noooo body!
Reminds me of an old Irish prayer.
Dear Lord, bless the people who are nice to us and keep them well. And those who are mean to us, please turn their hearts and bless them too. And those who's hearts won't turn, please twist their feet so we'll know them when we see them coming.
Let the reader decide what to make of any of it. I'm just a tech. They don't pay me enough to think for you.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Anonymity Anonymous
Anonymous:
Ginger, I did not say that at all. You are asking the wrong person about Huron, is what I said. Sue Scheff, I have heard communicates with them daily. I don't. That is all I was saying. Ask her. If I didn't care about the kids, could I be named in a law suit? Think about it.
Froderik:
--- Quote ---What in the hell are you talking about? Shout what out? How do you expect me to address what ever it is you are talking about if you can't be more specific? Your accusations against me are...?
--- End quote ---
Carey, This is YET ANOTHER instance of your Tar Baby Syndrome. Either that, or you're just really, really, really thick-headed. Gee...I wonder what anon could have POSSIBLY been referring to here... :flame: :skull:
Antigen:
--- Quote ---On 2003-11-16 18:44:00, Anonymous wrote:
"If I didn't care about the kids, could I be named in a law suit? Think about it."
--- End quote ---
Oh, absolutely! And why not? The suit is not about spreading news clippings and court documents to support the truth about WWASP. The lawsuit is about trademark infringement for the purpose of poaching business from their (your?) competition. For all I know, you folks went just as far over the top in your good fight against WWASP as you have against Carey right here on my server. And you're worried about her credibility???
Your argument seems to be based on a bad case of higher purpose complicated by a distinctly possible martyrdome syndrome. Anyone who does not accept your high holy purpose as an article of unquestioned faith must, therefore, be working for the enemy?
Gimme a break, man! Really. I had about enough of this gig over 20 years ago!
Web pages are like babies -- creation involves a level of enthusiasm that does not necessarily carry over into maintenance.
--Joe Chew
--- End quote ---
Anonymous:
Sorry, Ginger, you are wrong. I am not in the business and if you were a survivor that cared about the others in there, you wouldn't support someone like Carey. Give me a break, I don't even care to hear your story. I have heard it and it obviously didn't affect you enough to care what is still going on. You support someone who has put kids in jeopardy. I don't place kids, recomend placing kids or anything of that sort. You are so bitter and are using it against the wrong people. Try some of that bitterness on Carey. How would you like to still be in a Straight program and have someone like Carey jeopardizing everyones effort to have you removed? Or do you not care anymore? I have cut you slack on your stupid slander because you are a survivor, but, you obviously don't care about the kids still in there.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version