Author Topic: Multi-systemic family therapy  (Read 1440 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline heretik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 357
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Multi-systemic family therapy
« on: December 30, 2010, 07:16:52 PM »
This thread was inspired by a thread Ursus originated; viewtopic.php?f=44&t=32376  from this News Site I gathered this information, from a related article.
Thanks Ursus



http://www.independentmail.com/news/201 ... perts-say/

Home-based therapy best for troubled teens, experts say
Multi-systemic family therapy:

 * By Kirk Brown
 * Anderson Independent Mail
 * Posted December 17, 2010 at 5:28 p.m.

 Experts say parents need to find answers to the following questions before sending their child to a boarding school.

Key Questions

 
-- How often can parents contact and visit their children?

-- What are the qualifications of the school’s treatment staff?

-- What is the school’s policy on isolating and restraining students?

-- What is the school’s policy for medical care and medications?

Tough-love boarding schools have become a popular option for parents seeking to straighten out their unruly children.

But critics say that these schools are not always the best or safest option.

“There is absolutely no evidence that tough love works,” said Maia Szalavitz, a journalist who scrutinized the troubled-teen industry in her 2006 book “Help at Any Cost.”

Data gathered by the United States Government Accountability Office in 2005 revealed 1,503 incidents in which students were mistreated by staff members at boarding schools and wilderness programs.

In 2006, 28 states reported at least one death in residential facilities for troubled teens, according to GAO official Kay Brown’s testimony at a 2008 congressional hearing. Less than a year after this hearing, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a measure intended to better protect teens at residential programs. However, the legislation never came up for a vote in the Senate.

Szalavitz said parents should consider home-based treatment options before sending their children away to a boarding school.

“The best treatments for teenagers involve the family,” she said. “The idea that you can fix a relationship by exiling someone doesn’t pass the common-sense test.”

One highly regarded alternative to boarding schools is called multi-systemic family therapy. This approach, which was developed by faculty members at the Medical University of South Carolina in Charleston, focuses on reshaping virtually every aspect a juvenile offender’s life. This includes the youth’s relationship with parents, school officials and peers.

“We work with all of these risk factors in the kids’ everyday natural environment,” said Sonja Schoenwald, a psychiatry professor at MUSC.

Clinicians, who are on call 24 hours a day, work with juveniles and their parents in the home for a period of several months.

A number of studies have shown youths who take part in this intensive form of therapy are less likely to be arrested and more likely to stay in school. At an average daily cost of $59, the therapy also is less expensive than most boarding schools.

Multi-systemic therapy programs
have been created in 31 different states and 12 nations. In South Carolina, the state Department of Mental Health has placed multi-systemic therapy teams in five different counties. The newest team has worked with about 50 families since it was formed in Greenville County in 2008.

“We are getting better outcomes” said Gregory Wright, the multi-systemic therapy supervisor for Greenville County.

Practitioner review:  Practitioner Review: The effectiveness of systemic family therapy for children and adolescents
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 00047/full

Evidence-based practice in family therapy and systemic consultation
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 7/abstract

The effectiveness of family therapy and systemic interventions for child-focused problems
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1 ... 451.x/full
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline heretik

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 357
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Multi-systemic family therapy
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2010, 07:57:32 PM »
More information on (MST) 3 more links.


Multisystemic Therapy Program:
http://www.strengtheningfamilies.org/ht ... 4_MST.html
Description

Multisystemic therapy (MST) is an intensive family-based treatment that addresses the known determinants of serious antisocial behavior in adolescents and their families. As such, MST treats those factors in the youth's environment that are contributing to his or her behavior problems. Such factors might pertain to individual characteristics of the youth (e.g., poor problem solving skills), family relations (e.g., inept discipline), peer relations (e.g., association with deviant peers), and school performance (e.g., academic difficulties). On a highly individualized basis, treatment goals are developed in collaboration with the family, and family strengths are used as levers for therapeutic change. Specific interventions used in MST are based on the best of the empirically validated treatment approaches such as cognitive behavior therapy and the pragmatic family therapies. The primary goals of MST are to reduce rates of antisocial behavior in the adolescent, reduce out-of- home placements, and empower families to resolve future difficulties.

Several programmatic features are crucial to the success of MST. The use of a home-based model of service delivery (i.e., low caseloads, time limited duration of treatment) removes barriers of access to care and provides the high level of intensity needed to successfully treat youths presenting serious clinical problems and their multi-need families. Second, the philosophy of MST holds service providers accountable for engaging the family in treatment and for removing barriers to successful outcomes. Such accountability clearly promotes retention in treatment and attainment of the treatment goals. Third, outcomes are evaluated continuously, and the overriding goal of supervision is to facilitate the clinicians' attempts to attain favorable outcomes. Fourth, MST programs place great emphasis on maintaining treatment integrity, and as such, considerable resources are devoted to therapist training, ongoing clinical consultation, service system consultation, and other types of quality assurance.

Rigorous evaluation is a hallmark of MST. Well designed randomized clinical trials with chronic and violent juvenile offenders have demonstrated the capacity of MST to reduce long-term rates of criminal activity, incarceration, and concomitant costs. Other randomized trials have demonstrated that favorable outcomes are linked to therapist adherence to the MST treatment protocol. Current studies are examining the effectiveness of MST in treating a variety of serious clinical problems, evaluating variables that predict the successful dissemination of MST, and assessing the clinical and cost effectiveness of an MST-based continuum of care.
 
Implementation Costs:

Multisystemic Therapy (MST) is conducted by therapists who are part of a MST "team." Two to four MST therapists and their on-site supervisor make up a MST team which works together for purposes of group and peer supervision, and to support the 24 hour/7 day/week on-call needs of the team's client families. MST therapists are full-time Master's-level or highly clinically-skilled Bachelor's-level mental health professionals. MST supervisors are typically assigned to the program a minimum of 50% time and may carry a small caseload if assigned full-time. MST supervisors are either doctoral-level or highly competent Master's-level professionals.

MST staff must be highly accessible to their clients and often have both pagers and cellular phones. Typically MST programs budget for mileage reimbursement to cover 8,000 to 12,000 miles a year per therapist. Internet access for administrative staff is required for scoring of required Quality Control measures. It is recommended that a small amount of flexible funds be available to the MST team ($100 per client family) for occasional and/or emergency needs. An annual program-licensing fee is required and is based upon the size of the MST program.
Training Costs:

Program support and training in MST is provided on-site by MST Services, Inc. using essentially the same protocol that has been used in successful clinical trials of MST with violent and chronic juvenile offenders. Therapists and supervisors receive training in MST in three ways. First, five days of intensive on-site orientation training are provided. Second, 1.5-day "booster" sessions occur on-site on a quarterly basis. Third, treatment teams and their supervisors receive weekly telephone consultation from MST experts.

In addition to the elements of clinical training, the package of program support and training services includes a pre-training site assessment, assistance with program specification and design (including the development of quality control and outcome tracking system), and ongoing assistance with overcoming barriers to achieving successful clinical outcomes. The cost of program support and training is based on an all-inclusive annual per team fee. Fees range from $15,000 to $24,000 per team, plus travel expenses based upon the nature and size of the program.

Staff training in MST is an on-going process. A primary objective of MST Services is to assist organizations in building capacity to provide for part or all of their MST program's long-term training needs. In this context, program support and training expenses should be viewed as the annual cost of a Quality Assurance (QA) program. Based upon an average annual service capacity of 15 families per therapist per year, the total long-term QA costs (program support and training) is
usually in the range of $400 to $550 per youth served.



Functional Family Therapy (FFT):
http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/184743.pdf
This PDF is to long and comprehensive to post here. It is a very good read though. Here are some of the main points the: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) remarked on.

*From the Administrator


While a number of States and
communities are turning to punitive
approaches to addressing juvenile
crime, research indicates that such
approaches, despite their high cost,
are largely ineffective. Juvenile offenders
removed from their families and
communities eventually return, and
unless their underlying behavioral
problems have been treated effectively,
these problems are likely to contribute
to further delinquency.
Functional Family Therapy (FFT)
draws on a multisystemic perspective
in its family-based prevention and
intervention efforts. The program applies
a comprehensive model, proven
theory, empirically tested principles,
and a wealth of experience to the
treatment of at-risk and delinquent
youth.
This Bulletin chronicles FFT’s evolution
over more than three decades;
sets forth the program’s core principles,
goals, and techniques; and
reviews its research foundations.
Community implementation of FFT
is described, and an example of
effective replication is provided.
Thirty years of clinical research
indicate that FFT can prevent the
onset of delinquency and reduce
recidivism at a financial and human
cost well below that exacted by the
punitive approaches noted earlier.
I believe this Bulletin will help you
to consider the program’s merits
for your community.
John J. Wilson
Acting Administrator

The Evolution of
Functional Family
Therapy

(excerpt)

More than 30 years ago, it became apparent
to FFT progenitors that although the
rate and severity of juvenile delinquency,
violence, and drug abuse were growing at
a frightening pace, intervention programs
remained seriously underdeveloped
(Alexander and Parsons, 1973). In 1969,
researchers at the University of Utah’s
Psychology Department Family Clinic developed
FFT to serve diverse populations
of underserved and at-risk adolescents
and their families. These populations
lacked resources, were difficult to treat,
and often were perceived by helping professionals
as not motivated to change.
Although these underserved populations
were diverse in terms of family organization,
relational dynamics, presenting
problems, and cultures, they often shared
a common factor: They had entered the
school counseling, mental health, or juvenile
justice systems angry, hopeless, and/
or resistant to treatment.
 
[PDF]
Multisystemic Therapy Treatment Model

http://www.chestnut.org/LI/apss/CSAT/pr ... MST%29.pdf
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Truckin'

  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Multi-systemic family therapy
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2011, 12:37:24 PM »
Thanks for posting these, heretik. Another interesting approach is Dialectical Behavioral Therapy (DBT), which also heavily involves the family. All of these approaches, however, rely on the kid being somewhat compliant. If the kid won't go, or won't talk while in therapy, then it really can't work.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline Ursus

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 8989
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Multi-systemic family therapy
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2011, 04:15:39 PM »
Quote from: "Truckin'"
If the kid won't go, or won't talk while in therapy, then it really can't work.
Participating in any kind of therapy via one's own volition would be KEY here, wouldn't it?

Ever wonder 'bout what the long term effects of using one of those "transport services" are for a kid?

Incidentally, "coerced volition" doesn't count. Unless you're looking for examples of oxymora.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
-------------- • -------------- • --------------

Offline Truckin'

  • Posts: 11
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Multi-systemic family therapy
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2011, 11:13:09 PM »
Well, I was speaking more to the question of talk therapy, and also the willingness to faithfully attend the required sessions for it to work. Of course coercing someone to go to sessions and forcing them to talk usually doesn't work so well, as in they won't necessarily do it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »