Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Ridge Creek - Official Shill Thread
Guest3:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---Guest3, Whooter is the one who is doing the advertising for RCS. Of course he approves of it. He keeps posting it working like a dog for his masters.
--- End quote ---
Whooter - is this true? A "Yes" or "No" answer will suffice.
Jill Ryan:
RIDGE CREEK SCHOOL, AKA RIDGE CREEK, INC., AKA MOUNTAINBROOK ACADEMY-RIDGE CREEK, INC., ETC.
UNDER RIDGE CREEK, INC. REGISTERED AS A TITLE IV
PARENTS OF NON-ADJUDICATED CHILDREN NEED TO UNDERSTAND THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THE PLACEMENT OF ADJUDICATED CHILDREN WITH NON-ADJUDICATED CHILDREN.
IN JULY 2010 ORS SITE REPORT, RCS STATED - CURRENTLY NO CHILDREN AND DID NOT EXPECT START UP TO BE UNTIL SPRING 2011, YET THE ORS STATES 64 CHILDREN.
http://http://167.193.144.170:7001/ORSINV/facilitysummaryadd.jsp?varFACID=OTP001022
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Guest3" ---
We all know that HLA/RCS are the same. HOWEVER, RCS should not try to mislead parents into believing this so-called testimony is current and relevant. You are the one that keeps saying the HLA and RCS are two different entities. I think you of all people would object to this tactic of advertising, am I wrong?
--- End quote ---
I think it should be applied fairly, Guest3. If we decide to keep them separate then we should not try to mis lead parents by stating problems that occurred while they were HLA should not be applied to RCS. We should only attribute those events which occurred since they became RCS and leave the rest. If we combine the two then we should combine all of it. I am just looking for some consistency.
...
Guest3:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---
--- Quote from: "Guest3" ---
We all know that HLA/RCS are the same. HOWEVER, RCS should not try to mislead parents into believing this so-called testimony is current and relevant. You are the one that keeps saying the HLA and RCS are two different entities. I think you of all people would object to this tactic of advertising, am I wrong?
--- End quote ---
I think it should be applied fairly, Guest3. If we decide to keep them separate then we should not try to mis lead parents by stating problems that occurred while they were HLA should not be applied to RCS. We should only attribute those events which occurred since they became RCS and leave the rest. If we combine the two then we should combine all of it. I am just looking for some consistency.
...
--- End quote ---
So then you agree this is false, deceptive and misleading advertising?
Whooter:
--- Quote from: "Guest3" ---
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---
--- Quote from: "Guest3" ---
We all know that HLA/RCS are the same. HOWEVER, RCS should not try to mislead parents into believing this so-called testimony is current and relevant. You are the one that keeps saying the HLA and RCS are two different entities. I think you of all people would object to this tactic of advertising, am I wrong?
--- End quote ---
I think it should be applied fairly, Guest3. If we decide to keep them separate then we should not try to mis lead parents by stating problems that occurred while they were HLA should not be applied to RCS. We should only attribute those events which occurred since they became RCS and leave the rest. If we combine the two then we should combine all of it. I am just looking for some consistency.
...
--- End quote ---
So then you agree this is false, deceptive and misleading advertising?
--- End quote ---
No I dont, I cannot speak for them. There needs to be an agreement that HLA and RCS will be treated separately. Fornits posters treat them separately and together depending on the agenda or argument du jour. This may make a good topic for discussion.
...
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version