Its Behavior Modification, Ursus, not Brain washing. Sure the average program kids are further isolated from society than public highschool kids are and they are subjected to a very structured environment. But if you look at all the elements that need to come together to successfully brainwash a person these programs do not even come close. I will see if I can locate a link to the elements I am referring to.
Because brainwashing is such an invasive form of influence, it requires the complete isolation and dependency of the subject, which is why you mostly hear of brainwashing occurring in prison camps or totalist cults. The agent (the brainwasher) must have complete control over the target (the brainwashee) so that sleep patterns, eating, using the bathroom and the fulfillment of other basic human needs depend on the will of the agent. In the brainwashing process, the agent systematically breaks down the target's identity to the point that it doesn't work anymore. The agent then replaces it with another set of behaviors, attitudes and beliefs that work in the target's current environment.
Ya know... This all strikes me as yet another one of your derailments based on semantics and vocabulary choices, Whooter. Very similar to the hogwash you've posted in dozens of threads containing your BS arguments re. the "inappropriateness" of other commonly used survivor terminology.
Personally, I see
all of these terms (and more) as residing on a
continuum of persuasion, with more extreme forms on one end, and less extreme forms on the other. Not exactly like Margaret Singer saw them, but pretty similar. I think certain forms of advertising and propaganda have gotten a lot more aggressive since Singer came up with her chart, and I probably see them as a bit more coercive than she did.
And, while I
personally tend to use the terms "thought reform" or "thought coercion" "used to effect behavior modification" (or some similar derivations thereof) ... 'cuz, in
my opinion, these terms describe what *I* am talking about more accurately and with greater precision ... if someone uses the term "brainwashing," I'm not gonna flip out and attempt to derail the thread with a sidetrack on vocabulary choice, since I generally know just what the are refering to. This is fornits, after all.
Moreover, who am *I*, or anyone else, for that matter, to judge just how someone's program experience affected them?
Seriously, I really think ya gotta let people communicate the way they want to communicate, Whooter. Is it REALLY that important that they use "Whooter-approved" terminology? Geezzz.
I might also reiterate my point
earlier in this thread, and more effectively articulated by Shady in his
post just above, that programs are a great deal more sophisticated these days about how they cram this stuff into people's craniums. As Mary Poppins perennially warbles,
"A spoonful of sugar makes the medicine go down..." :dose: :dose: :dose: