« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Down

Author Topic: WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987  (Read 5147 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« on: October 08, 2003, 09:38:00 PM »
Wanna see HOW PROUD WWASP REAL IS ABOUT THERE ABUSE AND HOW STUPID THEY ARE FOR PUTTING IT ON THERE CONTRACTS?

THE CONTRACTS ARE VOID AND WILL BE A SIGNIFICANT HELP TO THE CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT

http://www.intrepidnetreporters.com/Tee ... #Restraint
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #1 on: October 08, 2003, 09:45:00 PM »
Quote
the Sponsors authorize the Program to use handcuffs, mechanical restraints, electrical disabler, made or pepper spray in order to restrain the student. Sponsors agree to hold harmless and release the Program from any liability or damages resulting from restraint procedures


That was not in Dundee's contract.

I would love to know what kind of parent would agree to that.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #2 on: October 08, 2003, 09:53:00 PM »
"This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with."


 :rofl:  :wave:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #3 on: October 08, 2003, 10:00:00 PM »
Quote
This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with."


What the hell does that mean?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #4 on: October 08, 2003, 10:14:00 PM »
It's in the enrollment agreement under:

Involuntary Enrollment Termination.

The Program reserves the right to terminate the enrollment of any student at any time if there is a default in the performance of any of the terms of this Agreement by the student or Sponsor, or if in the sole discretion of the Program the student is not a suitable resident of the Program or for any other reason the Program determines that the student should not continue to reside at the Program. This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #5 on: October 08, 2003, 10:23:00 PM »
Quote
On 2003-10-08 18:45:00, Carey wrote:

"
Quote
the Sponsors authorize the Program to use handcuffs, mechanical restraints, electrical disabler, made or pepper spray in order to restrain the student. Sponsors agree to hold harmless and release the Program from any liability or damages resulting from restraint procedures



That was not in Dundee's contract.



I would love to know what kind of parent would agree to that. "



It's probably not in any of the contracts anymore, didn't someone say this is a contract from 1987?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Carey

  • Posts: 826
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #6 on: October 08, 2003, 10:29:00 PM »
I guess I did not get the relevence of:

"The Program reserves the right to terminate the enrollment of any student at any time if there is a default in the performance of any of the terms of this Agreement by the student or Sponsor, or if in the sole discretion of the Program the student is not a suitable resident of the Program or for any other reason the Program determines that the student should not continue to reside at the Program. This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with"

to the to the orignial post on this thread that stated:

"the Sponsors authorize the Program to use handcuffs, mechanical restraints, electrical disabler, made or pepper spray in order to restrain the student. Sponsors agree to hold harmless and release the Program from any liability or damages resulting from restraint procedures"
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #7 on: October 08, 2003, 10:46:00 PM »
Quote

On 2003-10-08 18:53:00, Anonymous wrote:

""This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with."





 :rofl:  :rofl:

Oh, I get it, it makes it look like the parents could be pepper sprayed if they were unreasonable or difficult!  :rofl:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #8 on: October 08, 2003, 11:06:00 PM »
Yes, the topic is just explainging that The world wide association od speciality programs and schools are proud of abusing teens since 1987.


This paradise cove contract was made in 1998,


 :silly:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2003, 11:13:00 PM »
How could paradise be being sprayed with pepper spray and gettin electricuted by cattle prods be fun. WWASP is fraud in every aspect and every way, look at how this gang was set up, every method they use or say is to cover up the truth
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2003, 11:18:00 PM »
Carey ,

That means parnets who do not follow the Parent manual guidelines.Parents who question the authority of the Family Reps. Parents who ask to speak with their child prior to  level 3.Parents who wish to show up at the facility unannounced and speak with their kid.

It means,strives to control all of the things you and any sane person would consider the norm response to seeking confirmation their child is ok.

It is a tool the Program uses to control the parents into adhering to their Parent manual RULES or else they get their kid back before he is "fully baked."

The seminar staff were constantly referring to the Parant Manual as reference what and what not to do.

HEAVEN HELP US!
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Deborah

  • Posts: 5383
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #11 on: October 08, 2003, 11:34:00 PM »
What's curious to me is the use of the word "sponser".

One would assume that in the first statement it implies "parent":
the Sponsors authorize the Program to use...

But then later they use "parents":
This would include parents that are unwilling to follow the guidelines of the Program or are, at the sole discretion of the Program, unreasonable or difficult to work with."

Who are the sponsers that are giving the program permission to abuse? The parents or the referring party, or the mamas/daddys at the program?

If it is indeed the parent, then why not have the other read:
This would include "sponsers" that are unwilling to follow the guidelines....

Why the inconsistency in terms???
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
gt;>>>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<
Hidden Lake Academy, after operating 12 years unlicensed will now be monitored by the state. Access information on the Federal Class Action lawsuit against HLA here: http://www.fornits.com/wwf/viewtopic.php?t=17700

Offline FaceKhan

  • Posts: 395
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #12 on: October 09, 2003, 02:56:00 AM »
The contract is void anyways since you cannot give permission to violate the law. It is illegal to abuse your children and you can't sign a contract to allow another to do it.

It is illegal to administer psycotropic drugs without a license to prescribe them. You can't sign something to counter that.

In addition you cannot sign away the rights of the child to sue for the abuse so when wwasp or parents try to tell the kids they signed away their rights, they are either ignorant or lying.

In addition since it is illegal to transport a child across state lines for this supposed treatment without the permsission of both states, the contracts permiting the kidnapping of one's teen by "Escorts" are probably void as well and that would mean the escorts are guilty of kidnapping.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
All of the darkness of the world cannot put out the light of one small candle.\"

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #13 on: October 09, 2003, 05:55:00 AM »
you said it best FaceKhan
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged

Offline Anonymous

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 164653
  • Karma: +3/-4
    • View Profile
WWASP- Abusing teens since 1987
« Reply #14 on: October 09, 2003, 07:36:00 AM »
Quote
That means parnets who do not follow the Parent manual guidelines.Parents who question the authority of the Family Reps. Parents who ask to speak with their child prior to level 3.Parents who wish to show up at the facility unannounced and speak with their kid.


I understand what it says.  I don't understand why a parent would agree to it, much less adhere to it.  You parents were in control of the situation all along, you just made a choice to follow it.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4   Go Up
« previous next »