WY wrote:
Totally agree with this assessment. I can no longer believe anything that Whooter has posted because if he'd lie about something so big and important like having a child he doesn't have then what else wouldn't he lie about? I can see his :shamrock: li'l sidekick :shamrock: is getting upset when the truth comes out. He shouldn't idolize fabricators like this Whooter guy if he doesn't want to be disappointed in the results.
Now I'm wondering about the other "success stories" here. Are they fake? Are they also written by Whooter? Any way you cut it up it makes the "pro-program" cheerleaders look terrible when the head cheerleader gets her skirt pulled up to reveal her dong. It's unfathomable why someone would fake having a child that went to a program.
The only lying and disrespect going on here is Ursus and yourself and the prejudice you have against a certain member named Whooter.
Enjoy your time here.
This type of behavior where you target a member of the group for hate, disrespect, and to censor is exactly what goes on in programs an schools as you folks attest to. This is what we talk about here endlessly.
Why Ursus and Watchful Yoeman would want to foster such behavior is troubling to members here. We have threads in a non-moderated forum called "OFFA" where people can accuse anybody of anything or take out of context anything anyone says. As a matter of fact we already have one the has Whooters name on it already.
People who read here don't be mislead by people who are selfish and persuaded by vindictiveness.
Actually Danny B II, the only "predjudice" that has been demonstrated here is that PEOPLE HATE BEING LIED TO and consequently MOST PEOPLE HATE LIARS (I say most, because apparently you yourself admire liars).
Your friend John Reuben has been exposed as the LIAR that he is. Consequently, those of us that JOHN REUBEN LIED TO, have every right to discuss the PROVEN LIES he told, as well as
compare notes concerning what else John Reuben most likely lied about.
That's what happens when someone gets caught telling lies, Danny B II. Naturally, everything John Reuben has said is now open to scrutiny. You insist that we all should accept John's explaination of why he lied, and leave it at that. Why on earth should we accept the
word of John Reuben at face value, when we've already proven that he lies? Your logic make no sense what-so-ever.
What did Whooter lie about, who was he lying to. Really, what we are talking about here, is your oppression, on people you do not like. You fabricate the story however you want. The discussion, Whooter had, had nothing to do with you, he was coming to the aid of a women, who was being verbally mauled by guests. I would have done the same thing and for all we know since your posts from back when have not been strung together, you could have done the same thing.
As a matter of fact there are many here which if we allowed Psy to string your posts together, we would see that you had done the same thing. Most of you probably had the same intentions as Whooter, to help someone else who was being railroaded.
:shamrock: L'il sidekick :shamrock: , I think it's quite obvious to all that if Whooter were indeed "coming to the aid of a woman who was being mauled by guests" the proper course of action would have been for Whooter to log in and simply state "I think it's wrong for you guys to do this. Hear the woman out." Instead, Whooter made up an entirely fabricated "family story" while posting as a "guest" including a fictitious child that did not attend the program being discussed and held this out as a "program success story."
Two things stand out about this right away. One, spinning the yarn that this action was to come to the aid of another poster is a desperate attempt to justify getting snagged in a web of lies and its very apparent to anyone reading these posts. Two, anyone who would invent a "family history of program success" complete with an entirely nonexistent, invented child as the ceterpiece of the story and representing the "program success story" is simply crazy. Normal people don't do things like this. Instead they say "Hey, knock it off, you idiots. Let this lady talk. Please, worriedannie, just ignore those guys and tell us your story."
With the admitted fact that Whooter invented his entire family to try to deceive people reading this forum about programs one should not ever take anything he says without explicit proof of its veracity. That's just standard SOP when you know you have been presented with an unmitigated liar. :shamrock: Li'l sidekick's :shamrock: argument fails on this premise and Whooter's explanation isn't at all believable.
