Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > CALO - Change Academy at Lake of the Ozarks
The Truth About Whooter/TheWho/Other Aliases
Troll Control:
--- Quote from: "TheWho" ---Psy Wrote:
--- Quote --- Schools exist for the benefit of the customers, and customers have a right to demand accountability and oversight. They shouldn't have to ultimately... that's what state regulation is supposed to be for: so there is some authority making sure the kids aren't being abused, and their human rights are being respected.
--- End quote ---
Exactly, The customer is the parent, the product is the child. The schools will respond primarily/initially to the needs of the parent not the child...
--- End quote ---
Here Whooter admits that programs don't respond to children's needs, but rather parents' needs. He goes on to say"children are products," a very telling statement about his true beliefs.
Troll Control:
In this example of Whooter's employment at programs he admits to being part of the screening process for intakes at the program:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---That's funny. Spoken like a person who has never seen the inside of a program business office...
Mothball an empty bed? You're unhinged. The program motto is "Heads in beds and asses in chairs." I've heard this verbatim many times. Empty beds means empty accounts. That's definitley not how they operate.
--- End quote ---
Its okay if you disagree,DJ, I happen to know differently. This may have been the way in the programs you worked in.
I have seen the screening process and seen kids being rejected and the program moved forward with a lighter peer group. They could have easily accepted one of those other kids for a few months until they filled the slot, but they didnt.
...
--- End quote ---
I wonder how "just a regular parent" was soo intimately involved in the program's intake procedures? Soemthing fishy there, huh?
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---In this example of Whooter's employment at programs he admits to being part of the screening process for intakes at the program:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---That's funny. Spoken like a person who has never seen the inside of a program business office...
Mothball an empty bed? You're unhinged. The program motto is "Heads in beds and asses in chairs." I've heard this verbatim many times. Empty beds means empty accounts. That's definitley not how they operate.
--- End quote ---
Its okay if you disagree,DJ, I happen to know differently. This may have been the way in the programs you worked in.
I have seen the screening process and seen kids being rejected and the program moved forward with a lighter peer group. They could have easily accepted one of those other kids for a few months until they filled the slot, but they didnt.
...
--- End quote ---
I wonder how "just a regular parent" was soo intimately involved in the program's intake procedures? Soemthing fishy there, huh?
--- End quote ---
Ayup......just a simple program parent. No relation whatsoever to programs themselves. No relation whatsoever to Ed Cons and their ilk. No "fiduciary responsibility" to programs. Nothing to see here, move along people.
::) ::)
Troll Control:
Here Whooter, the ignoramus, trying to appear smart, gets pinched plagiarizing a Stanford professor and passing off the commentary as his own philosophical production.
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---
--- Quote from: "Whooter (kind of)" ---The relevant capacity qualifying children for possession of rights is that of the ability to choose. Children in general lack certain cognitive abilities—to acquire and to process information in an ordered fashion, to form consistent and stable beliefs, to appreciate the significance of options and their consequences. Children can be great risk takers...
--- End quote ---
Just in case anyone thought Whooter grew a brain and could miraculously talk intelligently on child rights, he plagiarized a Stanford website. Of course, he didn't cite his source. He tried to pass it off as his own work. I believe Ajax13 hit this on the head when he called Whooter "stupid and lazy." Alas, it's true, Ajax13. Good point.
Link to Whooter's Plagiarization
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---I stand by all my posts, Joel.
--- End quote ---
Because they were written by academics who know what they're talking about. :rofl: Whooter, OTOH, is a run-of-the-mill dumbass.
--- End quote ---
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "Dysfunction Junction" ---
--- Quote from: "Whooter (kind of)" ---The relevant capacity qualifying children for possession of rights is that of the ability to choose. Children in general lack certain cognitive abilities—to acquire and to process information in an ordered fashion, to form consistent and stable beliefs, to appreciate the significance of options and their consequences. Children can be great risk takers...
--- End quote ---
Just in case anyone thought Whooter grew a brain and could miraculously talk intelligently on child rights, he plagiarized a Stanford website. Of course, he didn't cite his source. He tried to pass it off as his own work. I believe Ajax13 hit this on the head when he called Whooter "stupid and lazy." Alas, it's true, Ajax13. Good point.
Link to Whooter's Plagiarization
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---I stand by all my posts, Joel.
--- End quote ---
Because they were written by academics who know what they're talking about. :rofl: Whooter, OTOH, is a run-of-the-mill dumbass.
--- End quote ---
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Son or daughter Whooter?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version