Well, your being affiliated with the Mulligan Group would make a lot of sense — as far as your fishing for the consensus about them around here goes...
Ya, what a great conclusion.
Did ya forget that
you yourself posted this just a couple of hours ago? Try rereading it one word at a time. You might make more sense of it then, emphasis added to assist you:
I posted the Mulligan Group to ask if you folks had/have anything negative on them.
Dumbass, I am affiliated with them for your information. I wanted to know.
[/list][/list]
-------------- --------------
However, I beg to differ on your description of my "selective memory." I distinctly remember your posts (which you wiped clean within a few weeks of posting them) containing a tone of disparagement towards the Mulligan Group. All the better to fish for info, mmm?
No you do not "distintly" remember me disparaging Mulligan Group at all, nice try there. This is one of the reasons Whooter has to keep mentioning the obvious to our readers, that you (Ursus) will manipulate and circumvent posts to fit your extremist attitudes. One could almost say it borderlines on "out right lying" but we are still under advisement not to say this until more info has been gathered.
Your words will eventually bury you Ursus.
Ah... and here is where "Mulligan Group affiliate Danny Bennison" has got to come out gangbuster-style, for fear that his associates might begin to question the ethics behind his information gathering tactics, lol. Where's the manipulation, Dannyboy? The circumvention? The borderline "out right lying?" Why, pray tell, they would appear to be in
YOUR posts, me boy, plain as day!
Did I say you disparaged Mulligan Group? No, I did not. Note that I described my remembering your conveniently wiped posts as having contained "a
tone of
disparagement towards the Mulligan Group." Ya know what a
TONE is, Dannyboy? It reflects "the writer's
attitude toward the material." In this case towards Mulligan Group. I don't recall your actually saying anything
specifically disparaging, but I do recall the
tone to be thus. Tone can also be the
sound of something, like a bell, but not the bell itself. One could say it
evokes something or other.
Nice try at putting words in my mouth, but ya still FAIL. Lol x 4.
-------------- --------------
Also, another thing that I found odd at the time was your depiction of them as being quite large, as if they were in the process of taking over the 12-step addiction treatment industry at any time. Since I had never even heard of them before (not that that means anything), I found that intimation somewhat alarmist and inflated, but... it's not like *I* would really know about something like that, eh? Somehow, your revelation that you are affiliated with them puts that in a more understandable context. Lol x 3.
Well I guess we did not have to wait long, you are a liar. Your statement above is a pre-meditative lie, which you are saying because you believe you can say whatever you want because my posts were erased. Which now you will try to manipulate folks here into believing that I erased because I was hiding something.
Ursus please, your "MO" is very well known here, it is old, you have tried to disrespect many good people here with your immoral tricks. Why you are a moderator only speaks for itself. Dogs often lie/lye with fleas.
Oooooo... Danny dishes out more gangbuster-style assertations! :eek: And calls me a liar! :timeout:
Too bad, Dannyboy, I called ya fair and square. Remember that bell I mentioned above?
it tolls for THEE! [/list]
