Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > Aspen Education Group
What Type of Kids "Succeeded" in Behrens Study?
Dysfunction Junction:
Not to mention no reputable outlet would publish it. That's why it's "self-published" on a doc host site. If it isn't peer reviewed and published in a reputable scientific journal, it's worthless. Hence it only appears on Aspen marketing sites and a doc host site where anyone can upload anything. It's junk.
Whooter:
Here is another interesting tidbit:
Over 150 professional publishers including Random House, Wiley, Workman, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Pearson, Harvard University Press and Stanford University Press are now associated with SCRIBD .
...
Dysfunction Junction:
Please stay on topic. You can start another thread to profess your love of SCRIBD.
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" ---The “typical” client in the programs is a white, upper-middle to upper-class,
16 year old male or female with prior treatment failures, who is functioning below average
academically and has multiple psycho-social problems. The most common problems treated are
disruptive behavior, substance use, and mood disorders. Most adolescents do not have a legal
record.
--- End quote ---
Wow....so kids that truly needed help, not quack "therapy", didn't fare so well. Hmmmm. And why send a kid away if they're not in real trouble? Why were these kids that "had lower levels of psycho-social symptoms at admission (adolescent report), the absence of a mood disorder," even there in the first place? Parents....do your damn job and quit farming it out to strangers!
Anne Bonney:
--- Quote from: "Whooter" --- The kids who are most likely to succeed would be those who had the lower levels of problems (which makes sense).
--- End quote ---
Then why are they there in the first place? Why are parents outsourcing their jobs?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version