I didn't need to call anyone to read it
Do you normally call someone to help you with your reading? Maybe you should. Maybe then you could understand that the words "oversaw" and "audited" never appear anywhere in the Behrens paper. Nowhere. Zip. Nada. Ungatz.
You can always tell when Whooter is caught fibbing because he becomes the repetitive spam troll ; )
Let me reiterate for you, since you can't read too good:
I called the WIRB office today and asked,
specifically, if they "audited" or "oversaw" the Behrens work. They said they did not. I did not ask if they approved the questionaire because that's written on the second page of the study, unlike some words you keep using, lols.
That also jives with Behrens herself, who makes no claim whatsoever that WIRB either "oversaw" or "audited" her work. Those words
never appear anywhere in the work. They only appear in
your claims which you cannot substantiate in any way, shape or form. Hence, you resort to name-calling and repetitive spam trolling.
On the second page of the study she says, quite clearly, that WIRB approved the questionaire and that's where
her claim ends and yours begins.
My question is simple: why did you make up the claim that WIRB both "oversaw" and "audited" Behrens' work when she never even claimed that ridiculous marketing fantasy herself? Just answer the simple question and we can move on to your remaining bogus claims.
I'm patient and I can wait. But you've had a couple of days and a made couple dozen responses ranging from your fantasies about me in my underwear to calling me a liar, yet, inescapably,
nothing you have said appears in that study. I'm sorry you're having such a hard time with this, but you ought not to invent stories and you won't get burned over and over.
