Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Troubled Teen Industry

High Impact

<< < (20/21) > >>

anon:

scottT:

--- Quote ---

Karen, answer the question if you dare.  Was it a 12 month contract?  




--- Quote ---if you would pull your head out of your

high-horse's ass for 2 minutes, you would simply read the post from earlier this morning and see that she specifically stated that she signed a 12 months contract.
--- End quote ---

--- End quote ---




See, what a dumb ass, she was told her child could graduate in 6 months, yet she signed a 12 month contract.  That tells me she lied.  



Can you show me where that post is, please.

 
--- Quote ---

Please refer to Karen's post of 9/28 at 17:44:00.  The reason there is a 4 month liquidated damage clause in the contract is BECAUSE IT WAS A 12 MONTH CONTRACT.  3 MONTH CONTRACTS DON'T HAVE A 4 MONTH EARLY CANCELLATION PENALTY.

What on earth is the point of this discussion?  Are you getting enough oxygen in there?
--- End quote ---

scottT:

--- Quote ---

Karen, answer the question if you dare.  Was it a 12 month contract?  




--- Quote ---if you would pull your head out of your

high-horse's ass for 2 minutes, you would simply read the post from earlier this morning and see that she specifically stated that she signed a 12 months contract.
--- End quote ---

--- End quote ---




See, what a dumb ass, she was told her child could graduate in 6 months, yet she signed a 12 month contract.  That tells me she lied.  



Can you show me where that post is, please.

 
--- Quote ---

Dear Carey:

Please refer to Karen's post of 9/28 at 17:44:00.  The reason there is a 4 month liquidated damage clause in the contract is BECAUSE IT WAS A 12 MONTH CONTRACT.  3 MONTH CONTRACTS DON'T HAVE A 4 MONTH EARLY CANCELLATION PENALTY.

What on earth is the point of this discussion?  Are you getting enough oxygen in there?
--- End quote ---

Anonymous:
Frankly, it seems Carey is doing more to expose the corruption within this so-called group of anti-WWASPSIES than anyone else and that's a good thing.  Doesn't mean she is PRO-WWASPS because she is putting people like Karen's feet to the fire. After all, these people do tend to color the truth with their own shade of reality as evident by their own words and actions.

scottT:
And yet,  I for one, thank god for the fact that the strongest evidence of "corruption" that you can come up with against anti-WWASPS parents is that there is an ambiguity concerning whether someone had a 12 month contract or a 3 month contract.  That's a topic of such profound import that you consider it "...having one's feet put  to the fire"???

   B-F-D!!! Get a life.  Maybe you could borrow one from somebody who hasn't been warped by too many parent seminars.

[ This Message was edited by: scottT on 2003-09-29 18:11 ]

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version