Yeah, so I get it, danny B. you really really like A.A. You believe in it, you endorse it , you really really wish every one else would ,too.
I don't.
This reads like a teen gossip column, and it would be morbidly 'cute' were the legal and social ramifications not so great. Actually, this is not so damned funny, given that legal and social policy is written and enacted on just such evil nonsense. People have spent lifetimes 'inside the fence' just to satisfy the vague unreasoning moral yearnings of the 'true believers' in our midst. Oddly, the same folk who loudly preach the A.A. nostrums are the same folk who abhor any discrimination at all, for the sake of any thing at all. Oh, but that might require independent thought. The Salem 'witch trials were awful, yet little or no probable cause is required in 'dope' cases.( probable harm or clear and present danger being pertinent criteria) and you are just fine with that. Do you not see how such naivete feeds the Narcos, and their incredibly violent machine. In their cause, you would qualify as 'dhimmi' or useful idiot. Here's two facts for the prohibitionists to consider.
A) one of the earliest known cultivated plants is marijuana. In excess of six thousand years, pre-dating agriculture as we know it.
B) One of the earliest known agricultural products is beer. some think potttery developed in order to make and store beer, and there is some evidence for that.
Although I no longer smoke rope, and haven't for many years, i still enjoy beer.( I'll confess here that i don't drink as much as I ought)
I'll hoist one to you and the other prohibitionists, while you ponder if the government has the right to tax ANY agricultural product. J.O.M