Wow, when finally faced with study results done outside the programs you guys really scramble to try to discredit it. There are no ties back to Aspen that I can see. Can you point it out?
Could you please be a bit more specific as to what you want pointed out? It's too early in the morning for me to be anything but dense!
I know what you mean, moving slow myself in the morning until after that first cup.
My question was.... I cannot find anything that ties this study back to Aspen. As far as I can see the research study was independent of any program. Is there a connection there I am missing?
Ah, you mean the myriad of "studies" that Big Tobacco conducts, many of them pertinent to targeting the youth market share.
"If they've got lips, we want them!" While I don't know how they tie in to
Aspen per se, they sure do tie into
other corners of the TTI, and share with Aspen a certain
semantically-based duplicity in their marketing strategy.
Hence, your repetitive posting of that silly excuse for a "study" that Aspen touts ... made me think of them!
You'll find a lot to like in a marlboro: filter, flavor, pack or box.
And it is the same way with Hyde. Hyde's flavor does not quit like other secondary educations. That unique Hyde taste just stays with you for the rest of your life.
viewtopic.php?f=43&t=26127&p=318762#p318762
And just
what, exactly, does Hyde School have in common with Big Tobacco? The
same deceptive marketing practices, even some of the
same marketing personnel! Just ask
Hyde parent Nancy Lund, "the key steward of the Marlboro brand for more than two decades" (her words),
generous contributor to Hyde's coffers (probably with the assistance of employer
Philip Morris / Altria Group, as that is their policy), member of
Hyde's Board of Governors, and most recently, key member of the
marketing focus group (along with marketing group
Leo Burnett Worldwide, Inc., co-creator of the Marlboro man) responsible for amping up
Hyde's PR campaign with the now not so new website:
Only @ Hyde.
Sell! Sell! Sell!! :jamin: