Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Seed Discussion Forum

administrator, why should pathology be tolerated?

(1/2) > >>

justonemore:
Stack Jones is a nasty little deviant. why should his posts be tolerated? it serves no-one and no-thing , except his deviant version of reality. A 'person" such as stack will continue in violent fantasy, over and over, (like a feed-back -loop in a shocked monkey) until he has no choice but to act it out, in some perverse fashion or other. Folks around him know that, and here we know it, too. Too much noise, too little signal, too much chaos in this mind, I wonder if it's perhaps of an organic cause, Syphyllis, late stage, or some kind of O.B.S. or maybe other cause? who knows, but to encourage it is a grave mistake!
To 'Sticky-Stack' yeah, I know you, and your kind, dealt with them for years.. sad, sad, sad.
Deal with yourself now, before it's too late. ::unhappy::

Antigen:
Because tolerance is the foundation of freedom.

Because controls on communication are, I believe, the linchpin of thought reform.

Because the Program exercises these types of controls to the extreme, causing extreme reactions in many of the captives, it's only fair and right to expect these extreme reactions. One man's poetry is another man's obscenity.

But at the bottom of it, because if the administrator were to take responsibility to control the kinds of speech that you don't like then said administrator would also have to take responsibility to control the kinds of speech that other people don't like. Your post above could be construed as hate speech against Stack. Should I delete it? Shit, half or more of the posts in this forum are offensive to somebody.

No, I think I'll leave it to the pro-program types to concern themselves with controlling what other people think and say and to you, gentle (or not) reader, to

Anonymous:
Yea, for Antigen, Freedom, AHHHHHHHH, at last. I agree.

justonemore:
Well, Antigen, at least you replied, and for that I thank you.
You suggest that my opinion of stack constitutes 'hate speech'. I consider that response to be a cheap-jack answer. Free speech implies, indeed necessitates, responsible speech. If the speaker speaks only malice, a forum,this one for example, quickly descends into babble, as this one has. We who have been 'guests'
should know well that'crazy-talk,stupid-talk' is a form of battery, and not to be tolerated.
The word 'obscene' derives from the Greek "that which should not be seen", and, like Stewart Potter said, it may be hard to define , but I know it when I see it.
What a quaint, archaic notion that one is, eh? Those dang Greeks, Huh? Yet were their lives more refined, less brutal than ours? What has human history taught us? After 25'000 or so years have we not learned any thing about normative behavior? (behavior includes speech, it's a complex behavior, but behavior nonetheless.) Get my point?
I called stack a " nasty little deviant". Well, a thing is what it is, and not something else. Many people who masquerade as 'mentally ill', are not so at all, but merely evil. It's malice, I think, that decides. ::unhappy::  ::unhappy::

Anonymous:
Poor Justonmore, not getting his way, I think the war got you Justonmore long time ago. Try reading rather then making speeches that make no sense at all. Ever notice how angry the real trolls get in here? For someone who never even went to the seed, you have no say so as far as I am concerned. When one experiences the crap that goes on in one of these places, then speak your b.s. Till then enjoy the reading. Now here is something for ya. Notice the anger that appears so many years later to the souls that were in those places. NOTICE JUSTONMORE, it is a crime to this day that souls like Art Barker are allowed to remain free from all he did. Till JUSTICE Justonmore, expect more out bursts, till then, no one cares what you post, all just laugh at you instead.  :peace:  :flip:  :rose:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page