Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Ridge Creek School - Accreditation
TheWho:
Recap:
--- Quote --- Do you believe the 300lbs asst. counselor who sat on the kid at Eckert and killed him should have been brought up on criminal charges?
--- End quote ---
I responded:
--- Quote --- No I don?t,
--- End quote ---
RobertBruce responds:
--- Quote --- The grand jury disagreed with you. Thank you for proving my point though, you've never cared about these kids.
--- End quote ---
Bruce, again, do you have a link of some sort to back up your claim?
Anonymous:
http://www.teenadvocatesusa.org/Remembe ... ltsie.html
http://www.ocala.com/article/20051201/N ... ld-s-death
http://www.isaccorp.org/documents/micha ... 24.00.html
This is beyond sad..The mother took her own life and that of her 7 year old son.
TheWho:
Thanks Jill. The whole story is sad and it affected the entire family and I would guess the counsellor and his family also. This shows again why I post here. If it were left to Bruces posts people would think the counselor was indicted by the grand jury and was guilty of doing something wrong.... but the posts reveal:
"A grand jury cleared the counselor of wrongdoing, saying he was following proper restraint procedures."
If I recall correctly the family of the boy still went after him and tried to sue him. But the Grand jury never believed he was libel.
What puzzles me is why posters like DJ and RobertBruce cannot stick with facts and just come out and state the truth. This really hurts the forums credibility and it is a continuous struggle to hold them both accountable. This is why I insist on links from the 2 of them especially.
RobertBruce:
I've got to say John, I love that you no longer have the ability to edit your post, or blame your edits on others. Take a look:
--- Quote ---The above seems like a reasonable response.... what was the outcome of the investigation?
--- End quote ---
You didn't ask if the counselor was brought up on charges John, what you asked was what the outcome of the investigation ended up being. The outcome being that both the program and the Juvenile Justice department were found to be at fault. The counselor, Joseph Cooley, followed the restraint procedures as he'd been trained, or in your own terms, he followed the porper procedure for killing a child. The DJJ later stated that the method used was actually improper. Despite what I'm sure you believe to be your expert opinion, McDonald's was never brought up on charges, or sued in civil court.
Thanks again for playing though, and again confirming for everyone you do not care about these children.
TheWho:
Sorry Bruce, you try to wiggle out of every lieyou tell. We all read it and now you are trying to change your story. You and DJ have a long history of doing this and I catch you every time. Show us a link where the grand jury disagrees with me when I said the counselor should not be criminally charged. I will tell you again and again. Every time you open your mouth I am going to ask you for a link to back up what you say... and this is why I ask:
RobertBruce:
--- Quote --- The grand jury disagreed with you. Thank you for proving my point though, you've never cared about these kids.
--- End quote ---
The facts:
"A grand jury cleared the counselor of wrongdoing, saying he was following proper restraint procedures."
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version