I ran into a dude the other night who had been among the angry clique (sorry) that had me temporarily banned for life from one of my favorite bars. One of the bar maids and maybe a friend or two spoke for me and un-banned me a couple weeks later. But I stayed away anyway cause.... well I had to figure out how I kept getting myself into trouble down there with people who I didn't even dislike.
There were a few many convos similar to this one I'm about to tell you about. But it all boils down to extreme over-reaction to things that shouldn't really upset me quite so much.
So this guy, decent sort, hard working local guy and pretty well liked by most folks who have known him all his life. He's at the bar with his girl and telling a story, right proudly, about how he up and walked out of another bar because they were serving a girl he knew was a minor and about how his employer's "ethics" policy required him to do that. Said he knew the girl was under age cause she was a good friend's daughter :timeout:
This set off some fearful sounding bells and whistles in my mind while out of my mouth came some words that, while probably not wrong or intended to insult or offend, came off as rageful disdain. I asked him how it was ethical to walk away and leave a young girl, especially a friend's kid, in one of the rougher bars in the area (rougher than any in this town, as I understand it). He said something about how it would be a violation of his company's ethics policy to be present in the event that bar were raided. :jawdrop:
I tried to explain my thoughts; that the ethical thing to do might have been to stay and make sure the girl made it home safely or maybe call her dad to come get her or at
least tip off the bar maid so that maybe she'd put the girl out. I tried to explain how blind obedience to senseless policy and fear of repercussion to the point of turning a blind eye to a friend's kid in danger (or even a stranger's kid) are just about the equal opposite of ethical. I even went so far as to try to explain how redefining the language in such manner is just incredibly dangerous and seeing it happening all around me is sometimes terrifying.
He didn't take it that way. Glad I ran into him again after all this time. I haven't overtly apologized to him yet but at least we had a much more pleasant conversation this time. Might have cleared the air a little bit.
Now, I don't think I'm wrong in feeling anger and fear, even intensely, over things like this. I just wish sometimes that I could reel myself in better and find more effective ways of communicating these kinds of ideas.
P.S.
Prescience
* Main Entry: pre·science
* Pronunciation: ?pre-sh(?-)?n(t)s, ?pr?-, -s(?-)?n(t)s
* Function: noun
* Etymology: Middle English, from Late Latin praescientia, from Latin praescient-, praesciens, present participle of praescire to know beforehand, from prae- + scire to know — more at science
* Date: 14th century
: foreknowledge of events: a : divine omniscience b : human anticipation of the course of events : foresight
— pre·scient -sh(?-)?nt, -s(?-)?nt adjective
— pre·scient·ly adverb
Definition B is the older one. It's a good thing! It means being able to extrapolate and make an educated guess about what's about to happen based on past experience and knowledge of events. That new one, definition A, is hog-wash! Nothing divine or mystical about logical thinking. But I guess logical thinking has become so rare that when people do it others around them are confused and think it's some kind of magic or something.
That one scares me a little. This one just makes me wonder a little
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/affected is not the same thing at all as
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/effected . But it seems that, in recent years, the two have become interchangeable in common communications, including respected print publications.