Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Current HLA Staff
RobertBruce:
--- Quote ---If HLA is allowing someone to dispense meds without the oversight of a licensed professional then they are operating outside the law.
--- End quote ---
Then we agree that HLA has been operating outside of the law. Fantastic, I knew you'd figure it out eventually.
So my other question remains for anyone who actually experienced it. What is the educational program like at RC?
TheWho:
I did not see where it was established that there was no oversight.
Do you have a link or some procedure we can look at?
Troll Control:
No nurse at HLA since 2006.
http://http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=13982&p=192891&hilit=hla+nurse#p192891
Funny how TheWho 'forgets' this when he was making the same argument three years ago.
Also funny how he keeps demanding 'links' but when you ask him for one 'the website is difficult and time consuming to update.' Asshole.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---No nurse at HLA since 2006.
http://http://www.fornits.com/phpbb/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=13982&p=192891&hilit=hla+nurse#p192891
Funny how TheWho 'forgets' this when he was making the same argument three years ago.
Also funny how he keeps demanding 'links' but when you ask him for one 'the website is difficult and time consuming to update.' Asshole.
--- End quote ---
We have established that the nurse was let go, but the governement procedures doesnt require a nurse to dispense the meds. A person with a GED could dispense them with little oversight from a licensed person.. ie pharmacist.
RobertBruce:
John walk with me step by step through this. I'm determined that you understand this single point if nothing else.
Step 1. Your own link establishes, and you acknowledged, that while an unlicensed non medical staff member may dispense meds, supervision by a person who is licensed and certified in the field of medicine is required.
Step 2. HLA had no such staff member, either on the premises, or contracted through another organization to make routine visits as part of monitoring the situation.
Step 3. Having the phone number of a local pharmacist on hand to ask questions of is hardly the same thing as being supervised. The pharmacist is not going to come to HLA to ensure the receptionist, Assistiant Counselor, or student handing out meds is doing their job correctly. They aren't going to come by once a week and look over any reports taken, pointing out discrepancies, asking questions over why something was done a certain way, or certifing that things are being done properly.
Therefore, we can establish that since we know step one is true, and we know step two is true, it would then stand to reason that HLA was in violation of the law. Do you agree?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version