Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
Hidden Lake Academy - ORS Reports
Anonymous:
Actually, this is looking even worse for the ORS and the state of Georgia, who by their complete negligence in failure to act on their own findings are making themselves legally liable.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---Not true. Tell me, do you have a copy of HLA's case file, 2007-2009? No, you don't. So you are talking out of your ass on all topics, including the "number of pages" of ORS reports.
Not very honest, Who. Your credibility is getting worse and worse. You called "inspection reports" "incident reports" which is a lie. You then went on to calculate a figure based on your lie. You look really weak here.
Anybody can click the link you provided and read that none of the docs are incident reports. Try again.
The sole investigation report shows HLA acting illegally in every single random sample case. Every single sample had from 15% to 100% failure rate for legally required reporting and child safety measures, including offering no staff training, unsafe environment, missing records and on and on and on. They didn't pass a single investigation item, not ONE.
HLA is a shit-hole, based on the records you provided, Who. Thanks!
--- End quote ---
For the 3rd time I dont have the copy!! Another poster stated that the ORS reports are a reflection of the total (approx.5%). I was just doing the math and posting the results. If you disagree jump on the guest post...
Here it is:
Guest Post
Ha,Ha,Ha this how thing like this get started.. after awhile I will be quoted as saying "Thewho says there are 320 pages from HLA from 2007 thru 2009".
Based on information posted on fornits I am saying that HLA has improved over the past few years. That is what the information speaks to. I have no personal knowledge of this.
Troll Control:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---Actually, this is looking even worse for the ORS and the state of Georgia, who by their complete negligence in failure to act on their own findings are making themselves legally liable.
--- End quote ---
I completely agree with this. In my view their negligence is criminal. Imagine how long ago HLA would have been shuttered for illegal practices if ORS actually did their job.
--- Quote from: "TheWho" ---The ORS has 3,000 pages from 2005 to 2007. The ORS has 320 pages from 2005 thru last Friday. There is a huge decrease there.
--- End quote ---
--- Quote from: "guest" ---So what you want people to believe is that from 2005 to 2007 there were 3000 pages but from 2005 to last Friday there were only 320? Did they retract the other 2,680?
--- End quote ---
Whootie stepped in it again I see. I guess we're now supposed to take TheWho quoting an anonymous guest as "evidence." That just doesn't pass the smell test.
"I didn't read the file, but this anonymous guy said 5%, so it's a fact." You have to do better than this, buddy. Is this where you're at now? Quoting anons as gospel? You admitted you never read the file, so why are you posting as if you know something? You don't. BTW, you always used to brag about how rich you were, so why don't you just pony up the fee and get the file? Afraid of what you might have to admit to if you did? I think so.
This guy doesn't even put up a fight anymore.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---
--- Quote from: "TheWho" ---The ORS has 3,000 pages from 2005 to 2007. The ORS has 320 pages from 2005 thru last Friday. There is a huge decrease there.
--- End quote ---
So what you want people to believe is that from 2005 to 2007 there were 3000 pages but from 2005 to last Friday there were only 320? Did they retract the other 2,680?
See, Who, this is why you have no credibility. Ha, ha, ha. Nice try at covering up for HLA, but you'll have to do better thab that! This is just a blatant lie and you seem to be getting caught in more than a few of them today.
Why would you expect people to believe someone who claims ORS retracted over 2500 pages of HLA violations? You'll have to show some proof of these numbers.
--- End quote ---
Ahhhh, I see why everyone is so confused...typo... meant to write from 2007 to present (not 2005)
So there has been a significant decrease from 3,000 pages in the 2005 to 2007 time frame down to 320 pages in the 2007 to present time frame...
Hope that clears it up.
TheWho:
--- Quote ---Whootie stepped in it again I see. I guess we're now supposed to take TheWho quoting an anonymous guest as "evidence." That just doesn't pass the smell test.
--- End quote ---
So what you are saying is if a guest states they were abused in a program we can safely disregard the post?
--- Quote ---"I didn't read the file, but this anonymous guy said 5%, so it's a fact." You have to do better than this, buddy. Is this where you're at now? Quoting anons as gospel?
--- End quote ---
Quoting anons? So only those people who have a login name can be counted as being truthful? So anyone who says they went to a program and were abused can be eliminated because they dont have a login name and therefore are not creible...Hmmm
--- Quote ---You admitted you never read the file, so why are you posting as if you know something? You don't. BTW, you always used to brag about how rich you were, so why don't you just pony up the fee and get the file? Afraid of what you might have to admit to if you did? I think so.
This guy doesn't even put up a fight anymore.
--- End quote ---
I dont think you could find a post of me bragging about being rich. It would be interesting to read it if you found a link. Oh, wait you are a guest!!! Ha,Ha,Ha
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version