Author Topic: AARC Gala (Read 8083 times)

Anonymous · « **Reply #120 on:** June 08, 2009, 03:49:09 PM »

Here's my favorite. The Wiz, lying through his teeth as per usual, avoids directly answering any specific criticisms of AARC.
1. The clients are not assessed by qualified personnel to diagnose the condition AARC claims to treat.
2. AARC appears to diagnose clients as suffering from addiction when they are not.
3. The Wiz and his staff are not qualified to perform the interventions used at AARC.
4. A variety of disorders present in AARC clients go untreated as the staff is incapable of addressing the needs of the clients.
5. The methods used in AARC are harmful.
6. There is no evidence as to the number of clients in AARC who remain abstinent after graduating AARC.
7. The program takes in a vast amount of money that does not correlate with the services provided by AARC.
8. The host home system used in AARC is dangerous, and puts clients at risk of an array of abuses.
Too tough indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA6jKIf5 ... re=related
Doctor and preacher? Well, he's certainly not a doctor.
9. The methods used at AARC do not conform to accepted standards of practise used by mental health professionals to treat mood disorders, and are thus experimental.
10. Clients at AARC are not informed that they are experimental subjects, and do not provide consent to be used as such.
11. The ongoing behaviour modification experiment at AARC is not conducted by practioners belonging to a professional body, thus the staff are not subject to any standard for professional ethics.

Anonymous · « **Reply #121 on:** June 09, 2009, 01:58:02 PM »

How much did AARC rake in at the Gala in the support of cultish child abusers?

TheWho · « **Reply #122 on:** June 09, 2009, 02:30:56 PM »

Quote from: "guest4930285"

How much did AARC rake in at the Gala in the support of cultish child abusers?

Preliminary numbers show a 21% increase from last year. It was a nice event.

Anonymous · « **Reply #123 on:** June 09, 2009, 03:26:10 PM »

How much did they rake in last year?

Anonymous · « **Reply #124 on:** June 09, 2009, 04:17:37 PM »

Here's my favorite. The Wiz, lying through his teeth as per usual, avoids directly answering any specific criticisms of AARC.
1. The clients are not assessed by qualified personnel to diagnose the condition AARC claims to treat.
2. AARC appears to diagnose clients as suffering from addiction when they are not.
3. The Wiz and his staff are not qualified to perform the interventions used at AARC.
4. A variety of disorders present in AARC clients go untreated as the staff is incapable of addressing the needs of the clients.
5. The methods used in AARC are harmful.
6. There is no evidence as to the number of clients in AARC who remain abstinent after graduating AARC.
7. The program takes in a vast amount of money that does not correlate with the services provided by AARC.
8. The host home system used in AARC is dangerous, and puts clients at risk of an array of abuses.
Too tough indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA6jKIf5 ... re=related
Doctor and preacher? Well, he's certainly not a doctor.
9. The methods used at AARC do not conform to accepted standards of practise used by mental health professionals to treat mood disorders, and are thus experimental.
10. Clients at AARC are not informed that they are experimental subjects, and do not provide consent to be used as such.
11. The ongoing behaviour modification experiment at AARC is not conducted by practioners belonging to a professional body, thus the staff are not subject to any standard for professional ethics.Guest

TheWho · « **Reply #125 on:** June 09, 2009, 05:35:25 PM »

Quote from: "guest4930285"

How much did they rake in last year?

$562,000 in 2008 was "pledged" and they received 107% of that amount. The increase was mainly due to new marketing stategies targeting local businesses who will and have benifited directly from AARC's success. Our larger benefactors where able to dig a little deeper also to help support the families in need who could not otherwise afford treatment.

Anonymous · « **Reply #126 on:** June 09, 2009, 06:56:48 PM »

Here's my favorite. The Wiz, lying through his teeth as per usual, avoids directly answering any specific criticisms of AARC.
1. The clients are not assessed by qualified personnel to diagnose the condition AARC claims to treat.
2. AARC appears to diagnose clients as suffering from addiction when they are not.
3. The Wiz and his staff are not qualified to perform the interventions used at AARC.
4. A variety of disorders present in AARC clients go untreated as the staff is incapable of addressing the needs of the clients.
5. The methods used in AARC are harmful.
6. There is no evidence as to the number of clients in AARC who remain abstinent after graduating AARC.
7. The program takes in a vast amount of money that does not correlate with the services provided by AARC.
8. The host home system used in AARC is dangerous, and puts clients at risk of an array of abuses.
Too tough indeed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA6jKIf5 ... re=related
Doctor and preacher? Well, he's certainly not a doctor.
9. The methods used at AARC do not conform to accepted standards of practise used by mental health professionals to treat mood disorders, and are thus experimental.
10. Clients at AARC are not informed that they are experimental subjects, and do not provide consent to be used as such.
11. The ongoing behaviour modification experiment at AARC is not conducted by practioners belonging to a professional body, thus the staff are not subject to any standard for professional ethics.

Fornits
Fornits Home for Wayward Web Fora
An open discussion about the troubled parent industry