Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > The Ridge Creek School / Hidden Lake Academy
HLA Facebook Groups
Troll Control:
you are, by far, the most dishonest poster on fornits. let's just leave it at that.
anyway, lacey, who went to hla, says you are absolutely wrong about how they work with sex abuse victims. i believe her over you. also, if you read the ors reports you linked to hla got gigged for not providing plans for treating sex abuse victims and i believe them over you as well.
very poor showing, who. the facts aren't on your side, as usual, so you just make it up as you go along.
TheWho:
--- Quote --- you are, by far, the most dishonest poster on fornits. let's just leave it at that.
--- End quote ---
You must be new. Stick around awhile. I provide the facts the best I can. If you see a discrepancy feel free to point it out.
--- Quote ---anyway, lacey, who went to hla, says you are absolutely wrong about how they work with sex abuse victims. i believe her over you. also, if you read the ors reports you linked to hla got gigged for not providing plans for treating sex abuse victims and i believe them over you as well.
--- End quote ---
I have no idea how HLA deals with sex victims. As far as the ORS report I think what you are referring to is this.
R 0852 290-2-5-.08(6)(d)1. Staffing.
..” Based on record review and staff interview, the agency failed to provide documentation of a completed staff orientation in two of four files.”
Now are you being honest?
They couldn’t provide proof in 2 of 4 files. If they left off a student date of birth they would be written up for that too. But it doesn’t mean the child was never born…it just wasn’t documented and the inspectors know this also. I there was no training at all, no documents and no procedure they would probably loose their license. But this wasn’t the case.
Troll Control:
boy, for the one providing the links, you haven't read them very carefully! go back and read again. it has nothing to do with this. they were cited for not having service plans for sex abuse victims. bad job here, who. and dishonest.
did you notice that you just posted a 50% failure rate on that item? not good at all. pulled four files, failed on two. not good at all. and that's just this one item. most of the others are worse.
TheWho:
--- Quote from: "Guest" ---boy, for the one providing the links, you haven't read them very carefully! go back and read again. it has nothing to do with this. they were cited for not having service plans for sex abuse victims. bad job here, who. and dishonest.
did you notice that you just posted a 50% failure rate on that item? not good at all. pulled four files, failed on two. not good at all. and that's just this one item. most of the others are worse.
--- End quote ---
Exactly, they do have service plans (because they were documented in 2 of the 4 files they pulled) as you pointed out. They failed to document them thats all. If they failed to document a childs birth date it wouldnt mean that child was never born. It means it wasnt written down.
If you see something different than what I do then post it out here and include the section number as I did. It would be good to take a closer look at it.
Troll Control:
no.....failed to document doesn't mean they have it and didn't document it. it means it isn't documented, which means it may not exist at all. you need a logic course!
what about the items where they failed to provide staff training? big black eye there. "this is jim. he has a g.e.d. jim will lead therapy group today." fucking wonderful!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version