Oh but John, you're still missing the linking up is done. Further (and I do appreciate you allowing me to tear yet another one of your arguments apart) you're wrong on every point.
Here, allow me to educate you once again:
I already knew he was not going to get it done or he would have done it the first day if for any other reason just to rub my face in it. But for some reason he doesnt want us to see what he writes when he is not logged in
In actuallity there is nothing to add. I don't guest post, I don't play the same games as you. If your argument was true, then why did I pubilically ask the mods to link up my guest post twice? And why was nothing added at the time? Just because you pretended to be a moderator doesnt make you one John. Answer me on those points John, if you can.
(I never had a problem exposing my guest posts because I have nothing to hide).
Then you shouldnt have a problem doing it again. We all know you won't, you're a coward. It's the exact same reason why you wont bring suit against this site for exposing you as John D. Reuben. If you did, you'd have to open up all your posts for review. Let's not ignore the fact the last two times your postings were linked up, it was only due to the fact that Deborah tricked you.
He has a higher guest post rate than anyone else here. Most of us recognize his guest postings, he doesn’t hide them very well .
But I think this is a win/win for all of us.
Hence why you attempt to attribute every guest posts that tears you down to me. You're still too arrogant to accept that you dont have any supporters on this board, no one believes you, hence why carry on conversations with yourself. You even go so far as to assume every detractor is me because your mind wont allow you to consider the fact that there are others who recognize you for what you are. A child abuse supporter.
But I think this is a win/win for all of us. With me ignoring his trolling he will be forced to either troll someone else (which is doubtful), stop posting or resort to more constructive conversation. I think it would be healthier for Bruce (and us) to engage in conversation and debate which has more helpful content and more informative to the readers instead of destructive and vulgar. But time will tell.
Oh but John, how quickly you forget yet again. After you lost this current argument I once again offered you the chance to have a conversation that was soley focused on facts, and left out all the attacks, superfolus conversations or game playing. My only condition was that you not play your usual games. You being too attached to them declined. It was your choice not mine. You later on were manipulated into a conversation where I focused only on the topic at hand, you though per your usual M.O. tucked tail and ran the moment questions came up you couldnt answer.
I tried to explain this to you yesterday, and I like that you were paying attention enough to at least borrow from my own point. You ignore the questions put to you, and you look like the coward you are. You answer them and you expose yourself and your beliefes as being pro child abuse. Either way you lose.
I'm not going to stop holding you accountable John. You can call it trolling if you like, but remember you have your own definition for trolling which Id be glad to repost. If you can handle having a grown up conversation (I dont think you can) then I'd be happy to oblige you. Otherwise I'm not letting you off the hook John.
