Author Topic: WHO v DISH  (Read 2195 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
WHO v DISH
« on: April 18, 2009, 04:46:23 PM »
Quote
I have read some of your posts also and have not seen the administrators take action against you.

Fornitian administrators have beef with me?

Action against me for what?

Am I allowed to recount and testify to the truth ( vis a vis my experience )?

No ?

Yes?


???

Fuck it all.

Let's just forget about all this bullshit and hang out with the who.
« Last Edit: April 18, 2009, 04:57:25 PM by dishdutyfugitive »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2009, 04:56:26 PM »
Quote from: "dishdutyfugitive"
I have read some of your posts also and have not seen the administrators take action against you.
Quote

You mean Fornitian administrators persecute me?

Action against me for what?

telling the truth ( recounting my experience )


and

my experience?

When is the last time you opened the snot valve from your left nostril to the Mel Wassermen carpet fiber because Rey Kreider screamed your head off and you obliged to CEDU quackery instead of pissing your pants or standing up for yourself and ambulating yourself to freedom ?

Now who is the troll? lol
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #2 on: April 18, 2009, 05:04:41 PM »
Quote from: "dishdutyfugitive"
I have read some of your posts also and have not seen the administrators take action against you.
Quote

You mean Fornitian administrators persecute me?

Action against me for what?

telling the truth ( recounting my experience )


and

my experience?

When is the last time you opened the snot valve from your left nostril to the Mel Wassermen carpet fiber because Rey Kreider screamed your head off and you obliged to CEDU quackery instead of pissing your pants or standing up for yourself and ambulating yourself to freedom ?

Exactly,Dish,  what is there to take action against?  Why does just one side of the issue have to be tolerated?  Why not tolerate both sides of an issue and that way there can be a discussion with differing views.
Why should I be persecuted for recounting my experiences or you for yours?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #3 on: April 18, 2009, 05:10:57 PM »
When is the last time you opened the snot valve from your left nostril to the Mel Wassermen carpet fiber ?

Did Rey and Sharon Kreider scream their head off at you ?

Were they trying to force feed CEDU dcotrine into you ?

Brett and Lisa ?

They know how to yell.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #4 on: April 18, 2009, 05:30:50 PM »
double post
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #5 on: April 18, 2009, 05:39:41 PM »
Exactly,Dish, what is there to take action against?

Plates of Chicken Shwarma.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #6 on: April 18, 2009, 06:01:49 PM »
Why not tolerate both sides of an issue ?

Congratulations on your full impact philabusterazation.


That's the point -

We lived and experienced  the "2 1/2 year remedy 24/7.

We've tolerated your side of the issue.

We've tried to

"move on"

 for the past 20 years using your broken moral compass.

It's broke my friend.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline TheWho

  • Posts: 7256
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #7 on: April 18, 2009, 06:44:15 PM »
Quote from: "dishdutyfugitive"
Why not tolerate both sides of an issue ?

Congratulations on your full impact philabusterazation.


That's the point -

We lived and experienced  the "2 1/2 year remedy 24/7.

We've tolerated your side of the issue.

We've tried to

"move on"

 for the past 20 years using your broken moral compass.

It's broke my friend.

You are not making any sense.  Get some sleep.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #8 on: April 19, 2009, 12:52:04 AM »
Yes, you're right - sleeping it off will remedy my present bout.


When I wake up - I hope to be normal. Please Aspen, fix me circuitry.
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline dishdutyfugitive

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 1105
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
    • http://www.foxmovies.com/fightclub/
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #9 on: April 19, 2009, 01:17:23 AM »
Exactly,Dish, what is there to take action against?

1 day, when all this bullshit is over and done with perhaps we can cross paths near Masada. Sand, sand and more sand. No witnesses

(all this banter is the world's worst hand job ever - am I really broadcasting this?)

Perhaps the quintessential antagonist v protagonist encounter will finally ensue. Perhaps judas will let you lend you 30 silver coins to finance your endevaour?

Why does just one side of the issue have to be tolerated? Why not tolerate both sides of an issue and that way there can be a discussion with differing views.

A discussion requires cooperation. Cooperation you lack. You, my friend are bought and paid for. Signed, sealed and delivered - I can't wait to find myself immersed in your next fumigatory pleasantry.

Why should I be persecuted for recounting my experiences or you for yours?
Paycheck every other Friday - right?
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »

Offline forgotmypassword

  • Posts: 3
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WHO v DISH
« Reply #10 on: April 24, 2009, 07:58:32 PM »
Quote from: "dishdutyfugitive"
Exactly,Dish, what is there to take action against?

1 day, when all this bullshit is over and done with perhaps we can cross paths near Masada. Sand, sand and more sand. No witnesses

(all this banter is the world's worst hand job ever - am I really broadcasting this?)

Perhaps the quintessential antagonist v protagonist encounter will finally ensue. Perhaps judas will let you lend you 30 silver coins to finance your endevaour?

Why does just one side of the issue have to be tolerated? Why not tolerate both sides of an issue and that way there can be a discussion with differing views.

A discussion requires cooperation. Cooperation you lack. You, my friend are bought and paid for. Signed, sealed and delivered - I can't wait to find myself immersed in your next fumigatory pleasantry.

Why should I be persecuted for recounting my experiences or you for yours?
Paycheck every other Friday - right?

I only hope he's paid. Can you imagine how 100% certified insane he is if he verbally abused abuse survivors on this site 8 hours a  day for (at least) 3 years for free?

 :eek:
« Last Edit: December 31, 1969, 07:00:00 PM by Guest »