Treatment Abuse, Behavior Modification, Thought Reform > News Items

blog of a program parent

<< < (67/69) > >>

Anonymous:
For a long period of American history, slavery was legal.

People will eventually begin to realize parents paying for thugs to intimidate their kids should be illegal, and it will be made so.

Maybe some grad student in 2246 will be researching the 'history of parental financed incarceration based thought reform in the late 20th and early 21st centuries' , and come across fornits web forum on the wayback machine of the future.

im willing to bet they will be just as confuzzled by the likes of dianne carter and thewho as any sane person of today would be.

laws might change, but morality does not.

Anonymous:

--- Quote from: "Guest" ---For a long period of American history, slavery was legal.

People will eventually begin to realize parents paying for thugs to intimidate their kids should be illegal, and it will be made so.

Maybe some grad student in 2246 will be researching the 'history of parental financed incarceration based thought reform in the late 20th and early 21st centuries' , and come across fornits web forum on the wayback machine of the future.

im willing to bet they will be just as confuzzled by the likes of dianne carter and thewho as any sane person of today would be.

laws might change, but morality does not.
--- End quote ---

Since people are so confused about Due process here's a link
5http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4GGLL_enUS305US305&q=isac

And it does apply to people under 18, its just not enforced regularly. Every once in a while it is. For example, the officer who found out Pathway was holding humans against their will ordered them to release all who wanted to leave, and those who wanted to go, left.

The same thing happened in the raids on WWASP facilites overseas.

TheWho:
So basically every child is incarcerated against their will.  If a reporter walked up to a daycare center and asked a little boy if he would rather be here or home with his family and the child says "I want to be home with my mom and dad".  Should they shut the place down and arrest everyone?  Should the reporter open the gate and let the children run free?
At what ages should these children be allowed to decide for themselves that they dont need to be held behind a fenced in area with no privacy?  age 6...9...10...14....18?

Anne Bonney:

--- Quote from: "Guest" ---So basically every child is incarcerated against their will.  If a reporter walked up to a daycare center and asked a little boy if he would rather be here or home with his family and the child says "I want to be home with my mom and dad".  Should they shut the place down and arrest everyone?  Should the reporter open the gate and let the children run free?
At what ages should these children be allowed to decide for themselves that they dont need to be held behind a fenced in area with no privacy?  age 6...9...10...14....18?
--- End quote ---


Fuck you.

FemanonFatal2.0:

--- Quote from: "Guest" ---So basically every child is incarcerated against their will.  If a reporter walked up to a daycare center and asked a little boy if he would rather be here or home with his family and the child says "I want to be home with my mom and dad".  Should they shut the place down and arrest everyone?  Should the reporter open the gate and let the children run free?
At what ages should these children be allowed to decide for themselves that they dont need to be held behind a fenced in area with no privacy?  age 6...9...10...14....18?
--- End quote ---

Oh yea because the program and daycare are just SOOOO much alike...

lol. honestly give it up, I tend to think giving this troll title of the infamous wooter is a title he doesn't deserve. His analogies are getting more and more ridiculous, either the wooters going senile or this copycat has got a ways to go before he could ever fill the shoes of thewho. :twofinger:

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version